Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting OXFORD NEWS to 80360 or email us
7:00pm Wednesday 15th February 2012 in News By Damian Fantato
residents who fenced off a grass verge have been told to get off the land by the end of the month.
The people from Marston, Oxford, want to seize ownership of the land outside the old Friar pub to safeguard one of the area’s memorial trees for future generations.
But Oxfordshire County Council came forward and declared it owned the land as it was part of the highway.
Roger Baycock, who runs Allegro Oxford saxophone shop on Marston Road, is one of the group who put up a chain-link barrier around the 15 metre long strip of land.
He said: “We want to protect this land because one of the memorial trees is on it. The council has not been removing debris from the land and I want to know why it has not been maintaining it.”
The land is home to one of the trees planted on Armistice Day, 1950, in memory of the people of Marston who died during the Second World War.
Mr Baycock and other residents had hoped to gain ownership of the triangular section of grass through a process called ‘adverse possession’.
Under the process, if land is fenced off and not claimed then, after a certain period of time, it becomes the property of the people who took control of it. But the county council has revealed the land is classified as highway and so cannot be claimed via this process.
Mr Baycock has been given until Friday, February 24, to remove the fence or the council will do it for him and charge him nearly £200 to do so.
County council spokesman Owen Morton said: “As the highways authority, we have a legal obligation to act when an illegal structure, in this case a fence, has been erected.
“We have asked the residents to remove the fence on several occasions but unfortunately they have not done so. Inevitably this has left us with no choice but to serve official notice.”
Comments(7)
Andrew:Oxford
says...
9:43pm Wed 15 Feb 12
Your_Kidding wrote:Isn't that because OCC own the majority of the highways and adjoining land/pavements, but subcontract elements of the work to OCC?
But Oxfordshire County Council came forward and declared it owned the land as it was part of the highway.
So which is it OCC you either own the highways or you don't. Your quick to jump up and defend a potential Tesco development but very slow to carry out any highway maintenance.
The New Realist
says...
10:20pm Wed 15 Feb 12
caz1111
says...
11:26pm Wed 15 Feb 12
Alfie Nokes
says...
5:40am Thu 16 Feb 12
King Joke
says...
8:36am Thu 16 Feb 12
Alfie Nokes wrote:Alfie, most roads in the County are actually operated by the County. To my knowledge only the A34 and M40 are operated by the HA.
County council spokesman Owen Morton said: “As the highways authority,..." erm wouldn't that be Highways Agency under the Department for Transport, I guess he thinks we know what he actually meant?
cweb
says...
9:59am Thu 16 Feb 12
Find jobs in Oxford, Banbury and Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Make a date in Oxfordshire and find friendship
Search Now »
Find homes in Oxford, Banbury and Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Cars for sale in and around Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Your_Kidding says...
7:47pm Wed 15 Feb 12
So which is it OCC you either own the highways or you don't. Your quick to jump up and defend a potential Tesco development but very slow to carry out any highway maintenance.