News RSS Feed


Traders celebrate as Headington car park housing plan scrapped

Damion Farah in the car park Damion Farah in the car park

BUSINESSES in Headington are celebrating news the Old High Street car park has been saved from development.

The car park has been removed from a list of sites put forward for future housing or student accommodation schemes.

Businesses and residents had been furious about the plans, saying they would have driven businesses to the wall because of the loss of car parking.

Councillors have now confirmed the idea has been axed.

Oxford City Council’s deputy leader, Ed Turner, said: “We will not be allocating Headington car park as a development site.

“There is a whole bundle of reasons around the nature of the site and the fact it would not be practical. It would be a very difficult site to develop.

“But we also received strong representations about it from the local community.”

Stella Welford, of Friends of Old Headington, said the scheme had always been a “mad idea”.

She said: “I am delighted. We were extremely worried, not only because of its impact on the conservation area, but also the effect it would have had on businesses.

“It would have meant the closure of the smaller shops, like Brambles, Headington Homewares and Oxford Design.

Headington Action chairman Patrick Coulter said: “There was a lot of concern among the business community that the future of Headington as a local shopping centre would suffer if we had not been left with reasonable car parking.

“Although it is not a big car park, out-of-town shops are struggling to keep going in the current economic climate, and they need all the help they can get. The timing was just wrong.”

Elaine Bellenger, of the Monaco fashion shop, said: “It is brilliant news. It would have had a huge impact on us and I am really pleased this has been dropped.”

The city council had faced strong opposition to the proposal, with thousands of people signing a petition against listing the site for future development.

Plans to build student flats on St Clement’s car park in East Oxford were rejected by councillors in September.

Mr Turner said: “In a place like Oxford, which has a quite tightly constrained urban area, there are very few easily available development sites left.

“You cannot just give up every time you have an objection, because there is a real need for housing in Oxford.

“At the same time, we do not want to damage the economy or existing green spaces.”

Lib Dem councillor David Rundle said: “There has been a petition with over 3,000 signatures and all the arguments were against it because it would have destroyed the district centre.

“The only people who did not see that were Labour. I wish they could have seen it earlier.”

Damion Farah, of Jacobs and Field delicatessen in Old High Street, said of the decision: “It is excellent news.

“Building on the car park would have mainly affected Waitrose, as people need their vehicle to carry their shopping away.

“If Waitrose had moved away, it would have been detrimental to everyone.”

Comments(7)

Andrew:Oxford says...
7:26pm Thu 24 Nov 11

Has JLP bought the car park yet?

At least if you shop in Wallingford, Waitrose refund the parking fee.

CLLR KEN TIWARI says...
9:06pm Thu 24 Nov 11

I suppose, the only people may- celebrate this-news , not building home any-more in this areas, must have home of there-own, i suppose ?
How miserable som people are ??????

M.Bhagwandin says...
2:52am Fri 25 Nov 11

In the end the collective voice of the residents and businesses of Headington was heard. Congratulations to you all for having the courage and perseverance to stand up and oppose this nonsensical proposal. Although I have to wonder if there wasn't going to be an election in a few months, whether Labour would listened to the voice of the residents.

While I understand the need for social housing, we have to face the fact that some areas cannot continue to grow exponentially without compromising the distinctive character of those places. In the case of Headington, this single proposal could have caused the closure of many already struggling businesses in Headington and damaged the community.

M.Bhagwandin says...
2:52am Fri 25 Nov 11

In the end the collective voice of the residents and businesses of Headington was heard. Congratulations to you all for having the courage and perseverance to stand up and oppose this nonsensical proposal. Although I have to wonder if there wasn't going to be an election in a few months, whether Labour would listened to the voice of the residents.

While I understand the need for social housing, we have to face the fact that some areas cannot continue to grow exponentially without compromising the distinctive character of those places. In the case of Headington, this single proposal could have caused the closure of many already struggling businesses in Headington and damaged the community.

Oxonian says...
9:49am Fri 25 Nov 11

Why does the Council waste everyone's time and money on proposing daft plans like this and the St Clement's housing scheme without fully investigating their wisdom first?

Sid Hunt says...
10:33am Fri 25 Nov 11

Oxonian wrote:
Why does the Council waste everyone's time and money on proposing daft plans like this and the St Clement's housing scheme without fully investigating their wisdom first?
There is a post from a councillor above, perhaps he could explain why councils act in this manner. Although it would appear from his comment that indiscriminate building is only opposed by selfish, miserable people.

King Joke says...
1:12pm Fri 25 Nov 11

Oh well, green belt it is then!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree