News RSS Feed


Trio walk free after vigilante attack

Joe Curran Joe Curran

A JUDGE has admitted taking “an exceptional course” in not sending three vigilante attackers to jail.

Grace Steele, Liam Garvey and Joseph Curran walked free from court despite being convicted of causing grievous bodily harm with intent – a charge which can lead to life imprisonment.

Judge Christopher Compston said the trio lured Thomas West to a Wallingford car park before attacking him with a metal ratchet after their victim had robbed an autistic man in the town.

Last September, the judge deferred sentencing of the three defendants for six months and said he would not jail them if they raised £500 each in compensation.

At Oxford Crown Court on Monday he kept his word.

He said 18-year-old Steele, of Didcot Road, Long Wittenham, had been “the honeypot” in luring Mr West to a car park at the Hithercroft Industrial Estate at 7pm on December 10, 2009.

Curran and Garvey, both 20, then set upon their victim, with the latter striking Mr West across the face with a ratchet and Curran punching and kicking him.

Mr West needed surgery to a fractured eye socket.

Steele and Garvey, of Cherwell Road, Berinsfield, admitted the charge while Curran, of Ford Lane, Drayton St Leonard, was convicted by a jury.

Mr West has six convictions for 20 offences. His attackers had none.

Jennifer Edwards, defending Garvey, said her client “has always said the only reason this activity got under way was to teach him a lesson for Mr West’s bad behaviour, when he beat up somebody who was unable to stand up for himself”.

Joanne Sear, defending Steele, said: “Her actions that day were completely out of character. She did not know precisely what was going to take place and in particular she did not know that weapons were going to be used.”

James Reilly, defending Curran, said: “He does not regard that sort of behaviour as right in any way, nobody does, but all you can say is this is very much out of character.”

Judge Compston initially gave Steele and Garvey 18-month prison sentences, suspended for two years, and Curran a two-year suspended sentence, but had to be reminded that only jail terms of 12 months or less can be suspended.

He then gave each a 12-month sentence, suspended for two years, and ordered Curran and Garvey do 200 hours’ community work and Steele do 100 hours. All three paid £500 compensation each.

Judge Compston said: “There is no question at all as far the guidelines are concerned you should be going to prison, and for quite a long time, I’m absolutely aware of that.

“But equally I make it quite clear I’m going to take an exceptional course. The main reason is the background.”

He said Mr West had committed “a most horrific attack” but told the trio: “You were utterly and completely wrong for taking the law into your own hands.

“To send you to prison you will only come out worse, not better.”

Prosecutor John Upton said an appeal against the sentence was “always possible”, but a Crown Prosecution Service spokesman said last night the case had yet to be looked at.

tairs@oxfordmail.co.uk l What do you think? Write to Letters to the Editor, Oxford Mail, Osney Mead, Oxford, OX2 0EJ, email letters@oxfordmail.co.uk or comment online at oxfordmail.co.uk

Comments(15)

elperrohavuelto says...
10:57am Wed 30 Mar 11

Finally a Judge that sees sense.
I publically congratulate the three for their actions, and would love to see more people take a righteous stand against the scum in our city. Feel proud of your actions, and let no one try and make you feel guilty because it is not you that allows people to abuse our society repeatedly with no real recourse or fear.

Niko Bellic says...
11:05am Wed 30 Mar 11

Can anyone comment on the punishment that Mr West recieved for his crime?
.
I completely agree with the comment above mine. I just hope that the compensation they had to raise will in turn have to be passed on to the autistic victim of the earlier crime.
.
Pat on the back for those 3!

elperrohavuelto says...
11:20am Wed 30 Mar 11

Only when more people start to muster the courage to say enough is enough, you will not treat us the hard working innocent people like this any further without a consequence to your vile actions, will the government wake up to the fact that they are failing to protect their people adequately. A vote of no confidence in our judicial system can only be done by self sentencing those guilty of crimes like attacking an innocent autistic person.

Mark L. says...
11:33am Wed 30 Mar 11

Well done to those guys. Lets hope we read of more cases like this as its the only way that victims can get any justice due to our joke legal system. If they are ever in Faringdon, I will buy them some beers.

GRB says...
1:14pm Wed 30 Mar 11

A good news story for a change. Let's hope the compo goes straight to the autistic chap and bypasses the scumbag who robbed him!

SteveOX4 says...
4:21pm Wed 30 Mar 11

They should have been given conditional discharges. I am autistic and think Mr West deserved what he got, possibly more.

Grumpy Git says...
5:13pm Wed 30 Mar 11

I find myself torn between two opposite emotions here.

The first is that the thug who committed the offence against the autistic man got what he deserved.

The second, two wrongs do not make a right and if we allow people to deal out their own form of justice as a matter of course it will not be long before law and order breaks down completely.

Thomas West is, by the sounds of it, a career criminal and in all probability has a season ticket for his local gaol. Like those before me I have to wonder what punishment he received from the courts.

I think I will remain sitting on the fence on this with perhaps slightly more of my weight leaning towards the first emotion.

Garv says...
6:11pm Wed 30 Mar 11

Niko Bellic wrote:
Can anyone comment on the punishment that Mr West recieved for his crime? . I completely agree with the comment above mine. I just hope that the compensation they had to raise will in turn have to be passed on to the autistic victim of the earlier crime. . Pat on the back for those 3!
He got nothing, Aaron was in intensive care and too scared to make a statement.

Mr.West found it funny bragging to his fellow low lifes!

Mr Peter Mcvay says...
7:30pm Wed 30 Mar 11

Why is it then that Tony Martin got life for exactly what you are encouraging here. And most of you lambasted him for it as well.

Sid Hunt says...
8:33am Thu 31 Mar 11

Mr Peter Mcvay wrote:
Why is it then that Tony Martin got life for exactly what you are encouraging here. And most of you lambasted him for it as well.
I don't think OM was on-line in 1999 for comments. I can not recall anyone speaking against Tony Martin for defending his property and it was public opinion that initiated the process for the reduction of his sentences.

elperrohavuelto says...
8:43am Thu 31 Mar 11

In response to Grumpy Git.
I am very vocal and open within the comments pages in the Oxford Mail about my opinions on ‘vigilantism’ and regularly look to encourage more people to take a stand. I do however agree with you that two wrongs do not necessarily make a ‘right’ and find it very upsetting that people like me, and others feel the need to put their own life’s at risk instead of being able to entrust the judicial system to adequately deal with these lowlifes.
Unfortunately however things are not going to change by simply moaning about them, we never see mass protests in this country over law and order, and what the majority of us see as soft ineffective sentencing, so why should the government sit up and take notice?
Radical change only happens after radical actions. If you want a better fairer sentencing structure which protects the victims rather than the “human rights” of the guilty, if you want to see a return of incentives like national service for those young people who need a bit of straightening out, then a vote of ‘no confidence’ needs to be echoed across the country on this issue by not leaving it to the judges to punish the guilty.

Muckaway says...
8:22pm Fri 1 Apr 11

Good on those guys, if we had harsher sentances, ripped out libraries and all leisure facilities out of prisons we'd be able to cram a lot more scum like West in, for longer. Feeding them bread and water and removing heatingwould cut costs aswell. Harsh yes, but prison is a punishment, not a sanctuary. I bet West is glad he didn't molest the autistic victim...

Stephens.ca says...
9:23pm Fri 1 Apr 11

Can anyone comment on what proof has been given that Mr.West was involved in the crime that his attackers accused him of?(unless they were witness to it?) in which case they would have given evidence and he would be facing a long custodial sentence. Seems strange that he wasn't questioned/charged/a
rrested or listed as connected with the crime. quick to judge springs to mind.

Stephens.ca says...
9:34pm Fri 1 Apr 11

Garv wrote:
Niko Bellic wrote:
Can anyone comment on the punishment that Mr West recieved for his crime? . I completely agree with the comment above mine. I just hope that the compensation they had to raise will in turn have to be passed on to the autistic victim of the earlier crime. . Pat on the back for those 3!
He got nothing, Aaron was in intensive care and too scared to make a statement.

Mr.West found it funny bragging to his fellow low lifes!
How do you know that he was bragging? Do you move in he same circles? !! Garv

Garv says...
11:05am Sat 16 Apr 11

who are you his mum.

I wouldnt of done it unless i was certain.

Local Businesses

Most popular