News RSS Feed


Dog control order may breach pets' rights, claim charity

A CLAMPDOWN on dog behaviour in Oxford could breach pets’ rights, a leading charity has warned.

The Blue Cross said moves by Oxford City Council to introduce ‘dog control orders’ could breach the Animal Welfare Act. But the council said this puts the onus on owners, not the authority.

The measures would include increasing fines for dog mess from £50 to £80 and banning dogs from play areas in parks.

The orders could limit the number of dogs one person can walk in public and give council officers the power to demand dogs be put on a lead.

But the charity, which is based in Burford, has hit out at the proposals.

Adoption centre business manager Nikki Smith said: “While we welcome measures to discourage anti-social behaviour by dogs and their owners, it is important not to discourage the pleasures of dog ownership and its positive impact on people and society.

“The Animal Welfare Act states that animals should have the freedom to display natural behaviours and dogs need the time and space to run and play off the lead.

“Those who do not can sometimes suffer worse behavioural problems or difficulty controlling their weight.

“It is also important to remember that dog owners who regularly exercise their pets in green spaces have a positive effect on public safety in parks, making them less lonely and deserted.”

And she warned the orders could reduce dog ownership.

Instead, the council should look at providing more incentives to dog owners to behave responsibly, such as more dog bins in parks and free “poo bags”, she said. But John Tanner, the city councillor responsible for the orders, said the legal responsibility for the welfare of pets rests with owners and not the council.

He said the plans are not “anti dog”, adding: “What we want to do is crackdown on the irresponsible owners that give all dog owners a bad name.

“Our parks are for everyone to enjoy, including dog owners, but it is not a good idea to have dogs running around in play areas or digging up flower beds.”

The authority provided dog bins but it is owners’ responsibility to buy bags for disposal, Mr Tanner said.

The new powers are part of the council’s Cleaner, Greener Campaign that has already taken a tough stance on litter in the city.

The orders would be made under the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act.

The consultation on the plans ends on February 10. Visit oxford.gov.uk or call 01865 252057.

Comments(11)

camden says...
8:35am Tue 11 Jan 11

I am amazed with myself as I actually agree with the council are saying. Dog owners (and i am a owner of two) have total responsibility for the behaviour of their dogs and cleaning up and disposal of the waste the dog produces. If the owner wishes to leave the dog of the lead and let them run take them somewhere suitable like Wittenham clumps. Shotover. The Ridgeway or Chrismas common.

Niko Bellic says...
9:37am Tue 11 Jan 11

If a dog is under control then it can be off the lead anywhere. Just look at the behaviour of most of the tramp's dogs in Oxford. Some dogs, cannot do this, my dog, for instance, could not be off lead by a road because being the big oaf he is, he is likely to be distracted an chase a bird or want to play with another dog. Plus, despite being as soft as a cushion and completely unintimidating, he is a big dog, and 40kg of big dog at that and because of his size I dont want him knocking over a child, old lady, or scaring someone with a dog phobia. Elsewhere, like in a park (and no i'm not going to shotover or wittenham clumps, thats ridiculous) or by the fields near my home, he is off lead and well behaved. Some dogs, of all breeds, however, are not suitable to be off lead anywhere, those with dog aggression, human aggression, need to be on lead wherever they are as they are unsafe to others. That does not breach animal rights, and even if it did, it would be worth doing so to protect the human rights of the general public

Joe Cooke says...
10:01am Tue 11 Jan 11

Why do they allow people to have dogs off the lead especially in Oxford city centre?

Wallingford2 says...
1:03pm Tue 11 Jan 11

Dog owners pay their taxes just like everyone else......so they should have the same rights to use public spaces. How about we ban children from the ridegway, the clumps and shotover hill?
Big fines for people who dont clear up is fair enough, but everything else they're proposing is utter rubbish.

riman09 says...
2:36pm Tue 11 Jan 11

This charity is an indebtedness to voluntary organisations. How on earth can anyone attempt to stifle Human Rights with 'animal rights'?
Surely it ought to be obvious that one cannot trample people's rights due to allowing 'dog rights'?
Am I missing something?

riman09 says...
2:37pm Tue 11 Jan 11

This charity is an indebtedness to voluntary organisations. How on earth can anyone attempt to stifle Human Rights with 'animal rights'?
Surely it ought to be obvious that one cannot trample people's rights due to allowing 'dog rights'?
Am I missing something?

locodogz says...
2:49pm Tue 11 Jan 11

@ Wallingford2

"Dog owners pay their taxes just like everyone else......so they should have the same rights to use public spaces. How about we ban children from the ridegway, the clumps and shotover hill?"

What???? Yeah Motorbike & 4x4 owners pay taxes too - let them 'rip it up' as well.

I think the clue may lie in the fact that very few children run up to and bark at strangers or c**p all over the place? Dunno - just a thought?

Wallingford2 says...
3:42pm Tue 11 Jan 11

locodogz, I would rather be in an area full of dogs than kids any day of the week. Wasn't like this when i was a kid....there were dogs running all over the place, and nobody batted an eyelid.

brianbbleys says...
3:50pm Tue 11 Jan 11

it's a pity the dog warden doesn't frequent Overmead Green, a resident from Knights rd with "Yorkies" lets them s*** all over the grass and doesn't even attempt to clean it up

the wizard says...
7:21pm Tue 11 Jan 11

Years back after spending all Sunday afternoon tending our front garden and putting it into good order, a frequent dog walker came past the front of our property, as usual, lead in hand, dog following some 50 yards behind. I continued putting the tools away and on return said dog had just deposited a ripe pile of dog-do on our lawn. I shouted on the owner, and he told me it "wouldn't hurt". I shovelled up the dog-do, followed dog and owner to their home and applied said mess with a trowel the the front door of the property. said dog owner and dog never walked this way again. As Corp. Jones used to say "they don't like it up'em....sir.

fronfoot says...
11:53am Fri 14 Jan 11

love dogs - don't love all dog owners. Have lost count of the times that a large dog has come bounding over to my small children - so far always playfully and yet always scaring the cr@p out of my kids.

And yet when I charge towards the owners they always seem offended!

Nobody should be cruel to animals - but anybody that quotes 'animal rights' is a tosser. They're animals end of and if you can't control them, don't have them.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree