News RSS Feed


Authors call for U-turn over library closures

Philip Pullman Philip Pullman

TWO of Oxford’s leading authors have described county council plans to end funding for 20 libraries as “shameful” and claim the move will impoverish communities.

Award-winning children’s author Philip Pullman and Inspector Morse creator Colin Dexter attacked proposals to save £2m over four years by scaling back the library service.

Unless volunteers step in to run the 20 libraries, they will close next year under the Conservative-run council’s budget plans.

Mr Pullman, who lives just outside Oxford, said the cuts were a “political decision”, which had been avoided by other councils.

He said: “Closing 20 out of 43 libraries is an absolutely shameful number, and it is not inevitable.

“A saving of £2m seems like peanuts in the county council’s budget, but it will do enormous damage, which cannot easily be repaired. It will markedly degrade the experience of life for many people in Oxfordshire.”

The His Dark Materials author said more mobile libraries and an online catalogue offering e-books offered “nothing like the same experience” as visiting a library.

He added: “For many people, the library is not just a source of books, it’s a place where they can be free to do other activities.

Related links

“A lot of children do their homework there. In Summertown, a lot of older people go to sit in the pretty little garden with a book and enjoy the sunshine. That will be taken away quite gratuitously.”

Mr Dexter, who lives in Summertown, said: “Libraries are one of the greatest boons and benefits any community can offer its citizens, and these proposals are ridiculously short-sighted. Books open doors, whether you are young, middle-aged or old. Reading is probably the most precious gift most of us have in life.

“This will impoverish people’s lives.”

Community groups can bid for part of a £200,000 fund to keep their area’s library branch open.

County council leader Keith Mitchell said: “Philip Pullman and Colin Dexter regard the £2m saving as not much, but I am afraid it is still a cut that has to be found.

“If we were to exempt the library service, the cuts would have to be added to those already planned for adult social care, youth services or highways maintenance.

“Where there is a strong local desire to maintain a community library funded by the community or volunteers, we would want to work with that local community to support their efforts, and we would hope that Mr Pullman and Mr Dexter would lend their weight to such Big Society aspirations.”

The budget will be presented by the council’s cabinet on January 25, before a final vote by the full council in February.

Earlier this week, Mr Pullman was among writers who forced the Government to scrap plans to axe funding for Bookstart, which gives free books to young children.

THE 20 libraries facing the loss of county council funding are: In Oxford: Blackbird Leys, Botley, Headington, Littlemore, Old Marston and Summertown.

Around the county: Adderbury, Bampton, Benson, Berinsfield, Charlbury, Chinnor, Deddington, Grove, Kennington, Neithrop (Banbury), North Leigh, Sonning Common, Stonesfield and Woodcote.

Comments(11)

Milkbutnosugarplease says...
11:59am Thu 30 Dec 10

Can we cut that useless, self-applauding county council magazine in which Councillor Mitchell spews platitudes at public expense? And a few layers of management in his glorious fiefdom? The pensions for all of these non-jobs will bankrupt our city long after libraries have been converted to fast food or coffee chain usage.

Has anyone thought of a council tax strike?

Darkforbid says...
8:05pm Thu 30 Dec 10

-This will impoverish people’s
lives.-

Are you sure it's not not the great many authors and publishers who could not survive without goverment bulk buying power that will feel impoverished?

Or maybe you should give your books away as free downloads...

Kropotkin says...
8:47pm Thu 30 Dec 10

In the October issue of the glossy magazine they claimed to be leading the way in cuts by a huge efficiency reducing the number of people processing invoices from 300 to 5. The Council has had to subsequently admit to me (I did an FOI request) that that claim was misleading. In fact a new IT system costing 220K with 27k annual costs plus about 137K staff costs for the 5 people to run it has replaced a system where people used to do their own invoice processing. The Council claims efficiency savings from less casual workers and various other 'paper savings'.

A good example of the Council then continuing to spend on expensive high-end prestigious IT systems whose principal purpose appears to be to make their lives easier.

Indeed how much would it cost council officers to have continued to do their own invoice processing, even work a little harder, and save nearly 400k in year one on this costly IT system? There's a fifth of the 2 million which Keith Mitchell is struggling to find straight off and I don't even work there.

Keith Mitchell humorously suggests the authors chip in themselves but we don't see much sign of that amongst council officers who continue to spend public money on themselves and misleading the public about it.

I would guess that Oxfordshire is like Councils up and down the land and with even a tiny bit of internal belt-tightening all these savings could be made without a single cut in front-line services.

Peterr Mcvey says...
9:15pm Thu 30 Dec 10

Strange how The Pullman never misses a chance to get his pic in the paper at the drop of a hat, but never actually gives any of his millions to save all of the things he so obviously doesn't care about.

Darkforbid says...
9:30pm Thu 30 Dec 10

-Strange how The Pullman never misses a chance to get his pic in the paper at the drop of a hat, but never actually gives any of his millions to save all of the things he so obviously doesn't care about.-

You sad man... Which library are you volunteering at BTW.

Peterr Mcvey says...
9:35pm Thu 30 Dec 10

Darkforbid wrote:
-Strange how The Pullman never misses a chance to get his pic in the paper at the drop of a hat, but never actually gives any of his millions to save all of the things he so obviously doesn't care about.-

You sad man... Which library are you volunteering at BTW.
I am not. But my point is that the bloke sticks his nose into everything without ever giving the financial help that would save whatever cause gets his fizzog on the front page. I.E. Jericho boat yard, it would have cost him only a few book sales to save that, but nothing forthcoming only the usual blustering.

Man on the Green says...
10:05pm Thu 30 Dec 10

Like others, I also feel that the benefits of the self-serving and (improperly 'politicised') Oxon News are marginal at best, and the amount to be saved by scrapping this pretty pointless publication would cover the shortfall in the Libraries budget.

Libraries are not the preserve of the rich - rather they are used mainly by those who cannot otherwise easily access information, buy books, consult reference works, or get on the Internet. 

This decision will have a significantly adverse effect on the most vulnerable and deprived sections of our communities. 

I too would urge the Council to reconsider. 

jenner says...
5:34am Fri 31 Dec 10

Oh don't worry everybody !!The self applauding Council Magazine will now have a human supplement !!A new position in the Council currently being advertised at £97,180 a year a "Head of Strategy and Communications" to promote Mr Mitchell's inept tenure no doubt.

Porphyro says...
10:57pm Sun 2 Jan 11

Perhaps that nice Peterr Mcvey will tell us all how he knows Philip Pullman "never gives" anything to support causes he believes in. He won't be able to, it goes without saying; Mcvey's pork pies are well known for their foul taste and poisonous recipes.

newcy says...
12:37pm Tue 4 Jan 11

Four of the Oxford libraries that are set to close are in areas of high poverty -amongst the working, the workless, and the benefits claimants. Areas with a high number of children who have little or no access to literature or printed information at home -add the closure of these libraries to the antipathy of local authorities and the general education system, and it seems as though the political powers are all determined to fail children whose parents have limited literacy and/or are on low incomes. This addd to the limited promotopn of the Bookstart programme for young children in Oxford - other areas continue to provide the free books to kids, but Oxford expects parents to beg and pleads for years before their children benefit from the programme. Less of a concern for some children perhaps, but for those who already have limited access to books this is just another insult.

newcy says...
12:39pm Tue 4 Jan 11

Bad keyboard day here -my literacy and grammar skills are not really as bad as my typing would suggest!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree