News RSS Feed


TV ANTENNA: More disruption as it needs replacing


HOUSEHOLDS could face months of disrupted television signals because Oxfordshire’s main aerial was ‘damaged beyond repair’ in a fire two weeks ago.

Arqiva, the company carrying out the county’s digital switchover, could not say whether it would take days, weeks or months to find and fix a new antenna to the mast at Beckley, near Oxford.

It could also not reassure viewers, some of whom have already been without BBC and ITV channels for months, that a full signal will be restored before England’s first World Cup game against the USA is aired on June 12.

The fire broke out at the mast on Thursday, May 13, leaving up to 410,000 homes without television signals for about eight hours.

Cable and satellite customers are unaffected by the work, but other viewers have already reported months of difficulty receiving BBC and ITV channels because engineers had to use a reserve antenna with a weaker signal as they upgraded the mast in preparation for the digital switchover.

Work was due to be completed in early May, but the fire has caused Arqiva to continue using the reserve antenna.

Last night, the company could not shed any light on when the problems would be resolved.

A spokesman added: “It is now clear that the main TV transmitting antenna on the Beckley mast was damaged beyond repair during the fire on May 13.

“A complete replacement antenna is being procured, and this will be installed and commissioned as soon as possible.

“Meanwhile, TV services from this site will continue to be transmitted from the reserve antenna, as they have been since February this year.

“We apologise for the ongoing inconvenience caused to viewers.”

Heather Morris, of Old Marston, Oxford, who has been experiencing reception problems since February, said the level of information given to viewers was appalling.

She added: “I don’t think much of it at all. They go on and on about how brilliant digital TV will be, and how there’ll be no problems with it. Well, there have been huge problems.”

Tony Augarde, of Carlton Road, Oxford, said he knew of people who had spent more than £300 ordering a new aerial because of confusion about the problem.

He added: “We should have been informed about the possibility of disruption before the work started.

“The information provided has been very inadequate.”


Comments(11)

Adrian1 says...
10:45am Wed 26 May 10

Is it just me who feels digital is worse than analogue? Poor signal in analogue sees a little snow on the screen and a back ground his on the sound, poor signal on digital sees picture freezes, picture break ups into digital blocks with a mind of their own and sound loss. I'm told this is an improvement, I think they meant to say cuts costs that you'll not see returned.

Fat boy says...
12:42pm Wed 26 May 10

The problem is Adrian1, digital is by definition either on or off. If the signal is strong enough it is on and if not it is off, whereas an analogue signal is available to a varying degree at all points between maximum power and off.
I suggest if this continues we all write to TV licencing to tell them we're not going to pay next year because we aren't getting what we've paid for this year.

Ellie the Bruce says...
1:41pm Wed 26 May 10

We haven't really been affected by the mast issue but I don't see why people who pay a premium to Sky for HD etc etc should have to pay their licence fee as well. Let people opt out of paying their licence fee - I really won't miss some of the trite they churn out on the BBC channels anyway.

oval yellow says...
3:26pm Wed 26 May 10

Fair enough people opting out of license fee if they don't watch or listen to any BBC services. But do you know of anyone who never watches BBC1, 2, 3 or 4? Or BBC News? Or BBC HD? Or BBC Alba? Or listen to Radio 1,2,3,4,5 or 6. Or Radio Oxford? Or visits the BBC website?

oval yellow says...
3:30pm Wed 26 May 10

I can't believe the bit in the story about people spending over £300 on a new aerial fitted. You could get a freesat box and dish installed for less than that.

Digby says...
3:39pm Wed 26 May 10

Its time the BBC went over to Subscription rather than licence fee. They no longer have the monopoly which they originally had and there is no justification for a "poll tax" for the ownership of a television. I suggest we all write to the new administration in Downing Street to inform them of our views. With digital technology it is very easy to arrange a subscription system where you pay only for what you want. We would then see how popular the BBC is and then maybe they would improve their output for us rather than have to suffer the dumbing down garbage they produce at exhorbitant expense.

LadyPenelope says...
4:40pm Wed 26 May 10

I've given up with the digi box as the signal is so bad, and gone back to analogue; it may be a bad picture, but at least the main channels work.

boagongrui says...
6:48pm Wed 26 May 10

Digby wrote:
Its time the BBC went over to Subscription rather than licence fee. They no longer have the monopoly which they originally had and there is no justification for a "poll tax" for the ownership of a television. I suggest we all write to the new administration in Downing Street to inform them of our views. With digital technology it is very easy to arrange a subscription system where you pay only for what you want. We would then see how popular the BBC is and then maybe they would improve their output for us rather than have to suffer the dumbing down garbage they produce at exhorbitant expense.
The licence fee is to receive a television signal,
Not to receive BBC

boagongrui says...
7:06pm Wed 26 May 10

MEDIA ALERT
Date: 26 May 2010
Oxford Transmitter Update – Full TV Services Restored by September
􀂃 Main TV transmitting antenna at Beckley mast damaged beyond repair
􀂃 Complete replacement antenna has been ordered
􀂃 Work to replace antenna expected to be complete by the end of September
The main TV transmitting antenna on the Beckley mast was damaged beyond repair during the fire on 13 May. A replacement antenna has been ordered from a supplier and a realistic timeframe for the restoration of full TV services is the end of September. In the meantime, TV services in the area will continue to be transmitted from the reserve antenna, as they have since February.
Peter Heslop, DSO Programme Director at Arqiva: “We are really sorry for the inconvenience caused to some viewers in the Oxford area following the fire at the Beckley mast. We understand how frustrating this must be for viewers. Arqiva manages over a thousand TV and radio transmission sites and incidents like this are extremely rare. Since the fire we have worked very hard to investigate what happened and work out how to restore full services as quickly as possible.”
“We need to install and commission a replacement main antenna for the Beckley mast. The antenna is a very specialist piece of equipment that is built-to-order by our suppliers. It’s also a complex operation to mount the antenna at the top of the mast that is dependent on a numbers of factors outside of our control, including the weather. The end of September is a realistic timeframe for restoring full services but we will do everything we can to bring that date forward.”
- ends -
For more information, please contact:
Simon Rothwell/Nicky Blunt
Harvard Public Relations
Tel: +44 (0) 207 861 2800
email: arqiva@harvard.co.uk

Digby says...
7:10pm Wed 26 May 10

Quote » | Report this post »
boagongrui, Blackbird Leys says...
6:48pm Wed 26 May 10

Digby wrote:
Its time the BBC went over to Subscription rather than licence fee. They no longer have the monopoly which they originally had and there is no justification for a "poll tax" for the ownership of a television. I suggest we all write to the new administration in Downing Street to inform them of our views. With digital technology it is very easy to arrange a subscription system where you pay only for what you want. We would then see how popular the BBC is and then maybe they would improve their output for us rather than have to suffer the dumbing down garbage they produce at exhorbitant expense.


The licence fee is to receive a television signal,
Not to receive BBC


REPLY

Thanks you for your observation,
however the licence fee in fact pays for the BBC and their dubious output. It would seem a bit steep to pay 145 pounds or so just to receive "a signal". I recieve a signal on my mobile phone but i don't have to pay for a licence for it even though it is a radio receiver and transmitter. We used to have dog licences but there was little money in it for the government so they dropped that idea. The licence fee funded BBC has long since been a good idea and the previous government used the BBC to provide it's propaganda.

marston old boy says...
10:40pm Wed 26 May 10

Am I being silly here but who owns the mast?. I also take it that Arqiva must be the only firm that carry out work of this type in the country as it seems that after so many mistakes they are still the company who are working on the mast. In any other business they would have had their marching orders a long time ago and a more compentent firm brought in.


The antenna fire from May 13 The antenna fire from May 13

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses