News RSS Feed


City faces a legal battle over Green Belt housing


PLANS to build 4,000 new homes in Oxford’s Green Belt are to be challenged in the High Court by South Oxfordshire District Council (SODC) and the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England (CPRE).

The district council served papers on John Denham, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, yesterday and the CPRE’s Oxfordshire branch is expected to do likewise in an independent case today.

It is six weeks since the Government’s South East Plan was published, in which the Secretary of State approved changes to the Green Belt next to Grenoble Road, in Greater Leys, to accommodate a new housing development.

SODC leader Ann Ducker said last night: “We have always said it is not sustainable to build housing to the south of Grenoble Road in south Oxfordshire and that this housing is not needed.”

'It is not sustainable to build housing to the south of Grenoble Road in south Oxfordshire and this housing is not neede'

Ann Ducker

The council has been given legal advice that it has grounds to challenge the decision.

District council cabinet member for planning Angie Paterson said: “Oxford City Council, backed by the Government, wants to expand the city into south Oxfordshire without justification.

“The city should use under-developed land within its own boundaries to build housing instead of trying to commandeer a large area of Green Belt that provides the unique setting for Oxford and contains some beautiful south Oxfordshire villages.”

A spokesman for SODC said it would spend up to £50,000 on the court action from an existing legal budget.

Dr Helena Whall, of CPRE Oxfordshire, said of the housing plan: “Not only would important areas of Oxford’s Green Belt be lost forever, but the development could also harm the Leys, already a deprived area, by removing open spaces on its doorstep, and increasing the transport and highway difficulties the Leys faces.

“Apart from that, it would threaten villages such as The Baldons to the south and Garsington and Horspath to the east, as well as placing further strain on the fragile infrastructure of the city itself.

“The 4,000 house extension would be as large as the town of Thame — and all on Green Belt land.”

Dr Whall said CPRE Oxfordshire would be willing to spend up to £30,000 on legal action and was delighted SODC was fighting a similar case.

Ed Turner, the city council's executive member for housing, said: “I think it is pretty obscene that South Oxfordshire District Council is spending taxpayers’ money trying to stop people in need of housing getting help and preventing local people from getting a foot on the housing ladder.

“The housing shortage causes enormous amounts of suffering and this is exactly the wrong sort of thing to be doing.”

City council leader Bob Price said: "It is very disappointing that SODC is proposing to use taxpayers' money to challenge this ruling on very weak grounds and to delay the important planning work that needs to be undertaken to ensure that the development meets our aspirations for a balanced and sustainable new community."

Oxford East MP Andrew Smith branded the court action an attempt to “strangle the social and economic potential of the city”.

He added: “If this move were to succeed, it would not only deprive people of homes, but stack up still more pressure for building on the remaining green areas within the city, along with more flat conversions and houses in multiple occupation.”

Oxfordshire County Council leader Keith Mitchell said the authority “shared and supported” South Oxfordshire’s concerns over the Grenolble Road plans.

Comments(7)

Andrew:Oxford says...
9:34am Tue 16 Jun 09

If it was possible to travel quickly and economically by public transport throughout Oxfordshire, then fewer people would have the desire to live in Oxford itself.

A light rail scheme running from Witney to Abingdon-Didcot-Want
age wouldn't be beyond the capability of Oxfordshire CC. Likewise a similar facility running from Oxford out to Thame. Both using old railway routes and new build diversions where the former trackbed is longer suitable.


neilg says...
9:51am Tue 16 Jun 09

Green belt -

Can I remind Ed Turner and Bob Price it is SODC money being used and not Oxford City money and I for one as a SODC tax payer am quite happy they are spending it on this legal action !

DanOxford says...
11:16am Tue 16 Jun 09

I won't labour the point as I've made it many, many times before, but we need to look at the underlying causes of the 'need' to build more housing.

Firstly, we need a population policy- a limit on how many people live in the UK.

Secondly, we need to tackle the causes of the increase in population.

Some of this is due to people living longer, some due to more single person households, but most is due to immigration.

More people have entered the UK than left every year since 1983 and the imbalance has dramatically increased in the years under Nulabour with their deliberate policy of flooding the UK with immigrants to give a false impression of increased wealth (more people- more overall earnings but they always fail to take into account that this increase has to be divided by more poeple and that billions are sent abroad by migrants), importing votes and undermining British (especially English)national identity so that they can subsume us into the EU.

Gven that so many people voted Green in Oxford in the recent elections, I wonder if they will now oppose the destruction of the greenbelt and will address immigration as the leading cause of UK population growth, or if the issue is fudged as the wishy washy nonsense on the Green Party's website shows:

MG100 The Green Party's longÏterm global vision is of an international economic order where the relationship between regions is non-exploitative, each region is as self-reliant and economically self- sufficient as practicable and the quality of life (social, political, environmental, cultural and economic) is such that there is less urge to migrate. Logically, in order to move away from the current level of immigration controls, we must create a fairer world.

http://policy.greenp
arty.org.uk/mfss/mfs
smg.html


To me, only Communism would achieve this aim, as only Communism aims for no difference between incomes and therefore no need to migrate.

Given that some areas of the planet are more hospitable and resource- rich than others, I cannot see a situation where Britain is not a target for migration from less desirable areas.

I suspect that the Greens will do nothing on this issue other than stroke their chins behind the usual Communist/ agraraian society based pipe dreams where everyone is equal.

Communism didn't work then and it won't work now.

DanOxford says...
11:59am Tue 16 Jun 09

'Oxford East MP Andrew Smith branded the court action an attempt to “strangle the social and economic potential of the city”.

He added: “If this move were to succeed, it would not only deprive people of homes, but stack up still more pressure for building on the remaining green areas within the city, along with more flat conversions and houses in multiple occupation.”

Yet again Andrew Smith wrings his hands over HMO's, yet fails to address WHY there is such a chronic housing shortage in Oxford.

Students account for a third of the population in Oxford, more and more areas (East Oxford, Headington, New Headington...) are turning over to scruffy student areas and the Brookes expansion will further increase the pressure.

Think of most recent brownfield sites within the city and you wil see that student, not affordable housing for local people, as been put up, usually at a very high density causing more over crowding and car parking shortages.

Nulabour's expansion of students and open door immigration policy have deprived local people of housing, not people trying to protect England as a green and pleasant land.

Brookes should be completely relocated to a campus location, where students could be far more efficiently accomodated in purpose built single room blocks with shared facilities rather than in family homes within the city, and immigration should be strictly limited.

erik256 says...
2:29pm Tue 16 Jun 09

for once, DanOxford is talking 100% sense my only hope is the other readers of this site see where he is coming from

brianbbleys says...
2:32pm Tue 16 Jun 09

the city council made a balls up with the planning of the 'greater leys' estate, we waited years for shop/s, promised pub failed to get built, the bus service is crap the roads too narrow if they don't listen to the people the same mistakes will be made again. Watlington rd is chaos during the rush hour and the road that goes passed sandford to the bypass is chocker block.
if I were a tenant near nightingale/grenoble
srd I would be whatching closely the plans to move the sewer works closer to greater leys as well

online_reader says...
9:29pm Tue 16 Jun 09

erik256 wrote:
for once, DanOxford is talking 100% sense my only hope is the other readers of this site see where he is coming from
I'd be more likely to read what he had to say if he could learn to be concise. His posts are often as long as the articles they're commenting on.


SODC leader Ann Ducker and cabinet member for planning Angie Paterson with the legal papers SODC leader Ann Ducker and cabinet member for planning Angie Paterson with the legal papers

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses