News RSS Feed


Police praised for firing stun gun at knife-wielding Leys drug addict


POLICE officers who fired a high-voltage stun gun at a knife-wielding drug addict were today praised by a judge.

Firearms officers shot James Layden with a 50,000 volt Taser gun after he threatened to kill another man with a large kitchen knife.

Pc Scott Marshall and Pc Terence Doherty were called to a house in Cherry Close, Greater Leys, after receiving a 999 call on November 12 last year about a weapon being used at the address.

When they went inside the house, they found Layden standing over another man, who was cowering on the sofa.

Layden was shouting death threats and wielding a knife.

They twice warned Layden, 24, they were armed and ordered him to stand still before firing the gun.

But the gun’s needle-tipped barbs, capable of delivering an electric shock to temporarily stun the victim, caught Layden’s jacket instead of his skin and had little effect.

Instead the officers subdued Layden with an incapacitating spray and he dropped the knife.

Layden, of Windale Avenue, Blackbird Leys, was handed a suspended sentence at Oxford Crown Court after admitting affray and possessing crack cocaine and heroin.

Jonathan Stone, prosecuting, said police were called to the scene at about midnight. He said: “They went into the living room and saw a male, the victim in this case, lying on the sofa in the foetal position. Standing above him was the defendant and the officers saw him holding a large knife in his hand.”

Mr Stone said police found Layden had 498mg of heroin and 1.88g of crack cocaine.

Peter Du Feu, defending, said: “He was behaving in a manner which was entirely unacceptable. It was illogical and irrational.

“There is a background of binge-drinking and consumption of drugs leading to irrational behaviour on his part.”

Mr Recorder John Hardy handed Layden a 12-month jail sentence, suspended for two years, an 18-month supervision order and 80 hours of unpaid work.

He said: “The police officers who entered the scene, at which you were found threatening a man with a large kitchen knife, acted in my view very bravely, given what they heard going on.

“They were confronted with a scene which prompted them, in my view entirely rightly, to react by using on you as best they could such incapacitating equipment as they had on them.”

He said the two officers should receive a Chief Superintendent’s commendation for their bravery.

Earlier this month Oxford East MP Andrew Smith criticised Thames Valley Police after the Oxford Mail revealed officers did not tell the public about the incident until it came to light after a Freedom of Information request.

Oxford police commander Supt Andy Murray said it was unfortunate the gun’s use had not been made public.

It was the third time a suspect had been shot with a Taser gun in Oxford.

esimmonds@oxfordmail.co.uk

Comments(17)

Botanic Garden says...
7:58pm Mon 23 Mar 09

Suspended sentence is a joke. Layden should have been sent down for at least 3 years. I would also like to hear Andrew Smith now praising the officers concerned and not criticising!

Spurs and Oxford says...
9:08pm Mon 23 Mar 09

this so nearly could have been a murder investigation and the guy doesn't even get a sentence, joke I hope they dont regret it.

JanetJ says...
9:08pm Mon 23 Mar 09

What exactly does a criminal in Oxford have to do to get sent to prison??

BigAlan says...
9:38pm Mon 23 Mar 09

In affleuent Oxford you actually have to murder someone to get jail, well it seems that way because almost every scrote who comes up before the beak walks out the door, no good fining them as they are potless anyways.

Lammy says...
5:58am Tue 24 Mar 09

Where do they find these judges.They don't live in the real world do they ? I guess the Old Bill must get pretty demoralised at times when you think of what the consequences could have been and the little toe rag walks free.The mind boggles.

sparro says...
8:08am Tue 24 Mar 09

You need to be a speeding motorist to be jailed.

bluenose says...
8:21am Tue 24 Mar 09

Of course he did not go to prison, it was only a perception that residents had that this happened, there is no crime on the estate only the publics perception. Ask the police they will tell you!!!!!

Sid Hunt says...
8:43am Tue 24 Mar 09

What a pity the officers didn't have live firearms.

Wesley_Smith says...
9:11am Tue 24 Mar 09

'498mg of heroin' he should complain to trading standards he's been under sold !

old zimmer says...
11:01am Tue 24 Mar 09

If you want to go to prison in Oxford it is easy. Claim housing benefit, then do a few hours bar work on the side to feed your kids, and hey presto 10 years hard time.

whataloadof says...
9:11am Wed 25 Mar 09

He should have gone to prison. Maybe next time if the police can't get there in time and he kills someone, he will.
Bit off topic but..old zimmer- I have absolutely no sympathy for benefit cheats. It is enough money to live on adequately as long as you're sensible with it. Why should my taxes pay your benefits if you're capable of work.

mickw1 says...
12:02pm Wed 25 Mar 09

whataloadof wrote:
He should have gone to prison. Maybe next time if the police can't get there in time and he kills someone, he will. Bit off topic but..old zimmer- I have absolutely no sympathy for benefit cheats. It is enough money to live on adequately as long as you're sensible with it. Why should my taxes pay your benefits if you're capable of work.
There is a difference between capable of work and finding it, any way your taxes go mainly to keep the likes of Andrew Smith in clover.

whataloadof says...
1:04pm Wed 25 Mar 09

You're right mickw1 there is a difference. I have no issue with people claiming benefits because they can't find work, I said I have no sympathy for benefit cheats. Someone claiming HB but working in a bar on the side for example...!

duwat says...
4:02pm Wed 25 Mar 09

"I have absolutely no sympathy for benefit cheats. It is enough money to live on adequately as long as you're sensible with it. Why should my taxes pay your benefits if you're capable of work."

It's a miserable existence, subsistence living. Wait till it's your turn. Does "ten claimants per vacancy" mean nothing to you? And your taxes are not paying my benefits, mine are: £75,000 in 2006 & 2007, how much did you put in the public purse in that time?

whataloadof says...
9:12am Thu 26 Mar 09

Can I point out that I took issue with zimmer's comment about people claiming benefit and working at the same time. Someone committing this kind of fraud is not only capable of work (& still claiming) but able to find work (& still claiming). Am I making sense now?

duwat says...
7:34pm Thu 26 Mar 09

You were making sense before, but you threw a blanket over a wide range of circumstances, including mine. It's boring, and I want a gallon of beer AND some flower pots. Also, there are plenty of ways in which it is legal to work and claim benefit, and to claim benefit and work, eg, join the TA! Serious fraudsters are a small minority (who deserve hanging), petty fraud is an administrative dodge more than a financial one. Why shouldn't I earn a pint by collecting glasses and firewood, and why bother telling "the Social". The apathy of the second generation in benefit culture is very depressing, but people of low ability have to make a lot of effort to earn more than they get in welfare - and what can you do with those who are just totally unreliable? They return +15% of their benefits in VAT and duty - and it's more expensive to lock them up!

whataloadof says...
9:40am Fri 27 Mar 09

Good point well made my friend!


James Layden arriving at court today James Layden arriving at court today

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses