News RSS Feed


Authority 'on back foot' over cancer treatment

5:33am Tuesday 19th August 2008

comment Comments (7)   Have your say »


A campaign group last night claimed the Government's drug licensing body was on the back foot over its decision not to fund a life-extending cancer drug on the NHS.

Kidney cancer patients in Oxfordshire are fighting to overturn the National Institute for Clinical Excellence's (Nice) draft guidelines ruling the drug Sunitinib too expensive.

The group - called Justice for Kidney Cancer Patients - is also lobbying Oxfordshire Primary Care Trust to prescribe the drug until Nice publishes its final decision in January.

Group spokesman and cancer sufferer Clive Stone, 60, said he believed Nice was feeling the heat after kidney cancer charities and patients across the country branded its guidelines a disgrace.

Mr Stone also dismissed comments made by Nice chairman Sir Michael Rawlins on Sunday that the high price of new drugs was to blame for its decision to ban the drug.

Mr Stone, from Freeland, near Witney, said: "Nice is on the back foot - it's starting to blame the drug companies. We feel we are winning."

PCTs have a legal obligation to provide treatments approved by Nice. But individual trusts decide whether to prescribe a particular drug while Nice makes its decision - often taking years.

Nice's chief executive Andrew Dillon told the BBC's Panorama last night the country's 152 PCTs should be consistent when deciding whether to make funds available for a drug during that interim period.

But Mr Stone said Mr Dillon's comments were irrelevant in light of Nice's draft guidelines on Sunitinib.

He said: "Health Secretary Alan Johnson said he wanted to end the postcode lottery' - Nice's recommendations end the postcode lottery at a stroke."

Twenty patients in the county have been denied Sunitinib because of Oxfordshire PCT's policy of only prescribing the drug in exceptional circumstances.

It is said to have one of the toughest policies in the country - only one patient, Stephen Dallison, 34, from Oxford, has successfully appealed against its decision not to fund the drug.

Mr Stone said: "We are one of the most highly taxed countries in the world, but we have one of the worst cancer survival rates. It's topsy-turvy."

Justice for Kidney Cancer Patients, which has organised a meeting with Tory leader and Witney MP David Cameron next week, wants people to continue to write to Oxfordshire PCT, the county's six MPs and Nice, opposing the guidelines.

The campaign group is also planning a trip to London to deliver members' letters to Nice by hand.

Nice declined to comment.

Campaigners have until Friday, August 29, to comment on Nice's draft guidance rejecting the drugs Avastin (Bevacizumab), Nexavar (Sorafenib), Torisel (Temsirolimus) and Sutent (Sunitinib), published earlier in the month.

To save navigating Nice's website, the Oxford Mail has tracked down the exact web address for readers to post comments. Click the link below.

Alternatively, cancer patients and campaigners can email Nice chief executive Andrew Dillon directly. His email address is andrew.dillon@nice.org.uk



Your Say YourOxford Mail

izzy, wirral says...
7:49am Tue 19 Aug 08

You have a responsible job to do and we the people have to trust your decisions, but how can we when money is given for research to find new effective drugs, only to find when a new drug does come on the market that the average person cannot access it.

People are dying and need hope. Give it to them. Remember but for the Grace of God goes anyone of us.

James, Cheltenham says...
8:54am Tue 19 Aug 08

Gice NICE a break, if they are eventually forced to offer the drug on the NHS, they will have even less money to play with... Meaning that a better cure for something else will have to be left a few extra years before it then comes available.

If every lobby group got it's way, there wouldn't be an N.I.C.E. and taxes would sky-rocket.

lJ, Yorkshire says...
10:04am Tue 19 Aug 08

It was the same with the bank charges ....everyone said go and sue your bank for the charges you paid when you were overdrawn and now, as a result we all have higher bank charges to pay for it!
There has to be sensible judgements made where finance is concerned, you cannot be guided by the heart. There is no bottomless pit of money, if one group get an expensive drug then there will be less money available for all the others. I have cancer so I do have more than an inkling of what this is about.

David Gerard, London says...
10:58am Tue 19 Aug 08

If only the NHS could get rid of these expensive and annoying patients, it could run perfectly smoothly! http://notnews.today
.com/2008/08/18/drug
-firms-deny-pricing-
for-profit/

Mr Ison, England says...
11:27am Tue 19 Aug 08

If only it were AIDS and not Cancer,they must have spent billions on those drugs.

Anon, England says...
11:43am Tue 19 Aug 08

What on earth are we doing raising money for Cancer charities to develop these drugs if we can't have access to them?!

Snake, Oxfordshire says...
1:01pm Tue 19 Aug 08

You can have access to these drugs, but only if you're rich. Who would have thought a Labour government and the founder of an NHS for ALL would oversee this kind of situation?

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »