News RSS Feed


'Million new homes would be hell'

7:00am Thursday 14th August 2008

comment Comments (10)   Have your say »


A think tank's idea for one million new homes in Oxford was yesterday dubbed "a vision of hell".

Policy Exchange, which has close links to the Conservative Party, unveiled the idea as it argued Oxford, Cambridge and London should take a million homes each because it was not worth regenerating northern cities.

It is estimated their plan would swell Oxford's population to about 2.5 million, the equivalent of the metropolitan area of the West Midlands.

On current housing densities, an area matching that would see 'Oxford' sprawl across the county east to west from the M40 to past Witney and north and south from Bicester to Abingdon.

Oxfordshire County Council leader Keith Mitchell yesterday called the report "madness" and questioned what effects such migration would have on local infrastructure.

Mr Mitchell, who is also chairman of the South East England Regional Assembly, said: "If this were to happen, people in Oxford would react with complete horror. This report has no merits at all. It would mean concreting over Oxford.

"We would become another borough of London and that isn't what makes Oxfordshire an attractive place to live and work. It's just madness.

"It would bring complete gridlock. The spaces where building can take place in Oxford are limited and the transport network by road and rail is at capacity at the moment. We need some growth, but it needs to be planned and managed properly."

The report argued that house-building restrictions in the South East should be lifted to lower house prices and stop people on low incomes being trapped in less prosperous parts of the country.

It also claimed an expanded Oxford would be richer than anywhere else in Britain, outside London.

But Oxford City Council's deputy leader Ed Turner, board member for strategic development, said: "This report is completely barking. We have an enormous need for housing in Oxford, but this is complete nonsense. It is never going to happen."

The plans were also blasted by Norman Machin, the joint-chairman of the Weston Front campaign group fighting plans for a 15,000-home eco-town close to Bicester.

He said: "This would be a vision of hell. Where on earth do they think they will put all these homes?"

Tory leader and Witney MP David Cameron said: "The authors of this report have themselves admitted it is barmy. It isn't, it is insane."

The think tank has worked on the scheme for a year and co-author Tim Leunig, who spent several years in the city as a student, said he meant for his recommendations to be taken seriously - although he admitted "some people will claim that these proposals are unworkable, unreason- able and perhaps plain barmy".

He said: "The Government has run out of money and regeneration funding is unlikely to go up in future. Many cities in the North are going to struggle."

Noting the negative response of some in the city so far, he joked: "You can never tell what the reaction will be, but I wasnt expecting people to be rushing to put up statues of me.

OVER the next 20 years the South East Development Plan has called for 662,500 homes to be built across the region, with 55,200 homes set aside for Oxfordshire. Of that, Oxford city has been told to provide 8,000 new homes with an additional 4,000 homes south of Oxford recently earmarked on land south of Grenoble Road.

There has been a long history of disputes between the city, district and county councils over plans for more houses in the county and the desire to expand Oxford beyond its current boundaries. The city's Labour administration has backed plans for the 15,000-home settlement Weston Otmoor "eco town", while the county council has officially voiced its concerns.



Your Say YourOxford Mail

Watcher, Oxford says...
9:59am Thu 14 Aug 08

Here we have it again - Keith Mitchell pretending to be incensed by the prospect of more housing. As Chairman of SEERA and one of the authors of the SE Plan, who was it who called for the 662,500 houses in Oxfordshire?

What about the people in Dicot, Bicester, Wantage and Grove Mr. Mitchell? Is their housing barmy??

ricky, oxford says...
10:06am Thu 14 Aug 08

the guy who proposed ,northaners move here ? obviously knows nothing of the place. joker ! may have scotts in his blood?oxford cant cope with the people here now.

Anna Lawrence, Oxford says...
10:39am Thu 14 Aug 08

Instead of constantly building on farming land and flood plains, why not use it for the purpose it was intended? If farming isn't profitable any more, then I suggest the farmers break up their fields into allotments and rent them out. The more people who can feed themselves, the less we have to rely on imports - and Oxfordshire stays green.

ricky, oxford says...
10:48am Thu 14 Aug 08

Anna Lawrence wrote:
Instead of constantly building on farming land and flood plains, why not use it for the purpose it was intended? If farming isn't profitable any more, then I suggest the farmers break up their fields into allotments and rent them out. The more people who can feed themselves, the less we have to rely on imports - and Oxfordshire stays green.
even afgans are growing farm produce insted off heroin ,about time our farms cashed in.no more houses we are a valley first to go under .hit the water belt to much already?keep us green .

Alwyn, Didcot says...
1:26pm Thu 14 Aug 08

Being stupid where are the roads, water and other utility supplies coming from?

Mr Ison, Detecting Crime says...
4:10pm Thu 14 Aug 08

http://www.transpare
ncy.org/news_room/fa
q/corruption_faq

Enoch Powell, says...
4:18pm Thu 14 Aug 08

Told you so.

Robert, bbl says...
7:10pm Thu 14 Aug 08

Enoch Powell wrote:
Told you so.
LOL

DanOxford, says...
7:42pm Thu 14 Aug 08

Oh come on- a million new homes on the greenbelt is a small price to pay to give so many people from abroad a 'better life'.

Record immigration is fuelling the biggest rise in the population for almost 50 years, official figures show.

ONS report on national population projections
Sir Andrew Green: We must cut back numbers now
Your view: How can Britain cope with the population surge?
Ten years from now, there will be 65 million people in the UK - an increase of five million - and by 2031, the population will be over 70 million, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said.


Within a generation, immigration will add the equivalent of a city the size of London to the population.

This is the fastest growth rate since the post-war baby boom - and is far more rapid than the Government forecast just three years ago.

One campaign group accused the Government of conducting a ''vast unplanned experiment’’ with the country’s well-being.

Statisticians said at least 70 per cent of the population rise over the next 20 years will be attributable directly to immigration.

The rest will be babies born to British mothers - many of whom are second-generation immigrants.

The Government has recently revised its long-term forecasts for annual net immigration upwards by one third to 190,000.



http://www.telegraph
.co.uk/news/uknews/1
567068/Record-immigr
ation-sees-UK-popula
tion-soar.html


..of course you could believe the government and blame it on your granny for being inconsiderate enough to be living longer and wanting to live in her own home; or on more people being single (the ones I know live 4- 6 to a house in Oxford) or that we need to lose our green space to build 'affordable' housing for local people.

There are the figures from the Government itself- you decide.




Mr Ison, England says...
8:05pm Thu 14 Aug 08

You gonna get raped.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »