News RSS Feed


'Eco-town firm are chickens'

11:13am Sunday 13th July 2008

comment Comments (23)   Have your say »


Developers behind plans for a controversial eco-town near Bicester have been challenged to show their faces at a series of roadshows around the county.

A total of 651 people have turned up to look at the plans for the 15,000 home Weston Otmoor eco-town at 10 roadshows so far.

However, residents have complained that Parkridge representatives have not been at most of them to answer questions.

People who attended the Middleton Stoney consultation last Tuesday said they were upset that they were greeted by representatives from a local PR firm who were unable to answer their concerns about the plans.

Rachel Brewin, 26, a self-employed marketing consultant who lives in Bicester Road, Middleton Stoney, said: "I asked to speak to the Parkridge person at our roadshow but was told no-one was there.

"I think it's scandalous that the 'consultation' doesn't actually involve anyone from Parkridge - it makes me feel like it's just a big PR exercise and doesn't actually mean anything.

"Everybody agrees that houses need to be built in England, but I don't agree with the plans and I want to discuss it with someone in charge. I feel I've been denied access to the people who can really answer our questions."

Parkridge director Roger Sporle attended the first roadshow in Weston-on-the Green on June 29 and a transport consultant fielded questions in Wendlebury a day later, but neither has turned up since.

Those attending the roadshows are greeted by green-shirted representatives of Mistral PR, who say they are gathering views independently of the developers.

Miss Brewin said: "It smells of chicken to me that Parkridge haven't got the guts to come forward and meet us. I find it so patronising. Just because the PR people are dressed in green and all the plans are on green boards doesn't make the plans environmentally friendly."

Ambrodsden and Chest- erton councillor Andrew Fulljames, who also attended the Middleton Stoney roadshow last Wednesday, said: "It was a shame no-one from Parkridge was there to speak to us directly but I'm not surprised. I don't think the consultation is anymore than a box-ticking exercise."

Mistral spokesman Lisa Hide said: "Representatives from Parkridge will not be attending any more of the roadshows. They were only ever meant to attend the first two roadshows because Weston-on-the-Green and Wendlebury are the two closest villages to the proposed development.

"It's not the case at all that they've been scared off. We are gathering people's views on the plans independently. Questions asked at the roadshows will be put to Parkridge by us. We want to encourage as many people as possible to come along because we want people's views good or bad."

No-one from Parkridge was available to comment.


Your Say YourOxford Mail

Mr Ison, England says...
12:24pm Sun 13 Jul 08

The use of shills is nothing new but the New MP for Henley should be naming them.

John W. Whitworth, 042-530 says...
2:07pm Sun 13 Jul 08

Far from being chicken they are liars.

I was told by Mistral that Parkridge weren't coming to ANY of the roadshows. When I pointed out I had a lot of questions they came at the last minute.

Mistral are lying about the green belt included in the site. It's 30% not 6%. They're building a tram on it.

The Parkridge transport consultant lied to me at the roadshow. He said the power station on the original plan which has now vanished was a greenhouse.

What a bunch of liars. Sue me if you dare.

Rockabilly Dude, Half Way To Memphis says...
2:34pm Sun 13 Jul 08

Well said John. Have a laugh...email Roger Spole at Parkridge...ask him if the M40, A34, and A43 are important factors in the siting of 'Weston Otmoor'...he'll tell you "no, catagorically not" (that's how he replied to me)...then respond, asking him to then defend the statement on their own website that says they are...see if you get a reply...I'm still waiting for mine! Then try asking him about the government's Land Management Agency report that says that the so-called 'eco-town' will cause massive and irrepairable damage to the enviroment of the area...this in the face of the Parkridge/Prologis claims to the contrary. And close by asking about Wayne Hemmingway's involvement with Parkridge/Prologis, and Flint's 'eco-town challange panel'...Liars? You bet.

Bob, says...
3:54pm Sun 13 Jul 08

The days of the empire are long over.

You have to face the fact that your standard of living has to come down to reflect the crowded island we live on.


You can no longer live in places like Middleton Stoney with your huge mortgages, and fool yourself into thinking that you are superior because you do not have "foreign looking" neighbours.

Welcome to the real world.

Tom, says...
3:58pm Sun 13 Jul 08

The only reason these numptys are objecting to more houses being built (which is badly needed) is that they are worried about the re-sale value of their houses.

Like every other thing in this country it comes down to hard cash.


Mr Ison, England says...
6:39pm Sun 13 Jul 08

Two New Labour shill have commented,can you spot them?

Is it two or simply one,themarketeer employed as controlled opposition.

Controlled opposition is the hallmark of the terrorist,would the MP for Henley weigh in?

There are not tens of thousand living within the villages crying out for a Ghetto.

Sick of Mr' Arseon, says...
6:49pm Sun 13 Jul 08

Mr Ison wrote:
Two New Labour shill have commented,can you spot them? Is it two or simply one,themarketeer employed as controlled opposition. Controlled opposition is the hallmark of the terrorist,would the MP for Henley weigh in? There are not tens of thousand living within the villages crying out for a Ghetto.
my name says enough

Cllr Ken Tiwari (Parish)independent, Oxford says...
7:35pm Sun 13 Jul 08

I wonder if I am wrong to think, this Eco-town
areas come in to Banbury constituency? And not
Henly? The above writer is asking for Henley MP
I remember as I was SODLP/secretary, 20years ago.
quote

Mr Ison, England says...
8:50pm Sun 13 Jul 08

Henley guy assured voters that Tennis guy would have his help.

Looks like a lie,the first of many.

Rockabilly Dude, Half Way To Memphis says...
11:02pm Sun 13 Jul 08

Bob, put away you're Nu-Labour anti-British sentiments for a moment and consider the facts - here's one for you...the developers, Parkridge, are controlled by the American giants Prologis...never heard of them? They are the worlds largest warehousing and distribution company...their European chief - and chair of Parkridge is John Cutts - one of the 300 richest people in the UK. If you were to bother reading the Prologis and Parkside websites, you would see that their entire scheme is simply a front to build a massive warehousing and distribution hub - at the junction of the M40/A34/A43 corridor. you've got the wrong empire in your sights - this entire scheme is simply about US globalisation. As for the moronic Tom, this debate has nothing to do with proerty values - locals homes will rocket in value due to the improved transport links promised - it has everything to do with preventing a new slum being created simply to fead big money's greed.

Mr Ison, England says...
12:32am Mon 14 Jul 08

You can vote for whichever of the swindlers agents takes you fancy.

It isn't much,in fact it isn't anything.

I see the tax payer will be financing local councils buying their homes and renting them back.

Wealth redistibution in action.

What do we get for ever rising taxation?

We get to be impoverished.

What do they get from ever rising taxation?

They get to fill the world with their progeny.

You see the role of taxation has become a means of exterminating the tax payer.

Immigrants are sent in to ensure competive hostility,and generally serve to provide tax payed obfuscators with a knife to twist.

Local resident, Bicester says...
9:53am Mon 14 Jul 08

This 'eco'-sham is such a FARCE! If they don't want people living there to use their cars, why build it next to the M40 and A34?! And how are 35,000 people going to be work in the area - most people who live in the area at the moment are forced to commute to Oxford, Birmingham or London for work. It's one convenient way of gettign a huge housing problem off central government's back. And has no-one else realised that all but one 'eco'-town is Tory heartland? Build cheap housing, get a load of labour voters in....?!

Tom, says...
5:41pm Mon 14 Jul 08

Local resident wrote:
This 'eco'-sham is such a FARCE! If they don't want people living there to use their cars, why build it next to the M40 and A34?! And how are 35,000 people going to be work in the area - most people who live in the area at the moment are forced to commute to Oxford, Birmingham or London for work. It's one convenient way of gettign a huge housing problem off central government's back. And has no-one else realised that all but one 'eco'-town is Tory heartland? Build cheap housing, get a load of labour voters in....?!
sour grapes,hope the new neighbours are nice.

Rockabilly Dude, Half Way To Memphis says...
8:35pm Mon 14 Jul 08

So Tom, you run out of arguements and just resort to cheap jibes. Clearly, just another Nu-Lab class warrior.

Tim, Kidlington says...
9:14pm Mon 14 Jul 08

We do need houses, but let's build them where they're needed. I live in Kidlington and work in Bicester. What will happen to local jobs with 20000 new people in the area? I also see lots of jams on the A34 every day, luckily I go the other way, but what will happen if this town gets built? I am worried about jobs in the area though.

DGrover, Brill says...
10:41pm Mon 14 Jul 08

How much CO2 will be released building 15,000 houses, or even 200,000 houses countrywide?
Surely a more environmentally sympathetic strategy would be to upgrade existing homes to zero-carbon status. On a per-dwelling basis, this would release 80-90% less CO2 compared a new build eco-dwelling, and will also reduce the overall CO2 output in the long term (with recovery in around 5 years).
I don't think arguments above about house prices are relevant either way, especially in these credit crunch times. We must tackle carbon emissions now by fixing existing problems (ie 30 million badly insulated houses!), not by more building and the destruction of carbon sinks!


DGrover, Brill says...
10:47pm Mon 14 Jul 08

The argument that we need more houses is bogus - there are 750,000 empty dwellings in the UK. Why are these not upgraded to zero-carbon status and then filled? And who and where are all the homeless people that need these 200,000 new houses?


Mr Ison, England says...
12:39am Tue 15 Jul 08

Browns housing.

What if the demand was Browns cabinet constituencies took the 200,000 foreign overspill?

Och aye?

Phil Mannerville, Bicester says...
11:12am Tue 15 Jul 08

Dismissing those opposed to this 'eco'town as NIMBYs is simply lazy.

There are other reasons - and far, far more important ones than those related to house value or 'new neighbours'(?!!?) - that people are opposed to it for.

Tom, says...
6:40pm Tue 15 Jul 08

Phil Mannerville wrote:
Dismissing those opposed to this 'eco'town as NIMBYs is simply lazy. There are other reasons - and far, far more important ones than those related to house value or 'new neighbours'(?!!?) - that people are opposed to it for.
are you going to Fuc*ing tell us or what you NIMBY?

Rockabilly Dude, Half Way to Memphis says...
8:33pm Tue 15 Jul 08

Here's a thought Tom - don't be afraid, even though that's it's probably a new thing to you - why don't you do some research of your own! Get some facts from a variety of sources - not just your own preducies - half an hour on Google will do the job. Then, when you've got an opinion, express it. Oh, and by the way, Phil can hardly be a 'nimby' can he? He lives miles away from the scene of the crime...or are you to stupid to even read a road sign or a map?

Phil Mannerville, Bicester says...
4:03pm Wed 16 Jul 08

Well said Rockabilly. Tom, for you and your foul language I, quite frankly, be bothered to tell you the reasons! Someone as clearly ignorant as you probably won't listen / understand anyway.

Crib sheet for those unable to do the homework, WOTG says...
7:38pm Wed 16 Jul 08

1) Its location next to the motorway appears to have been chosen because it suits the warehousing and logistics business of ProLogis, the developer's multinational American parent company, not because it is a good place for housing.

2) Building a new town at this site messes up existing plans to develop Bicester, Kidlington and Didcot, so is not supported by district council, county council, or the regional assembly.

3) Moving those in need of affordable housing from all round the county all in together into high density housing next to a motorway, and then charging them to drive out of the place, is outrageous social engineering and a recipe for riots.

4) Building on the site will destroy a nature reserve and a natural habitat of national importance, and at least 25 % of the area is protected green belt

5) The eco-credentials of the proposal have been criticised by just about every environmental group, and shown to be weak in the extreme, if not entirely bogus.

6) The plans make clear this is only phase one of a scheme that needs to be able to grow. Where will it expand to?

7) OX26, Bicester, is cheaper than the national average for house prices, not under extreme affordability pressure as stated by the government.

8) The developer's plans for free transport for residents have been shown by expert analysis to be, in the kindest words, undeliverable with the money they have planned to spend on it. So the residents may not even have the free ride round the town that has been promised.

9) There has been rather a lot of information put out by the government about the proposal that has turned out to be misleading, to say the least - eg. the green belt will not be built on, the site is brown-field, the final decision will be up to the local planning process - all now shown to be untrue.

10) There are three quarters of a million empty homes in England already. A more ecologically sound strategy would be to restore them and create jobs in those areas, rather than bringing more development and people to the South East of England and building tens of thousands of new homes there.

I'm not a NIMBY. When these things happen on your doorstep it does make you look very closely and try to find out what's really going on. The villagers of Weston will not have half as bad a time as the 30,000 poor souls who are forced to live behind the gates of Weston Otmoor.




Comments are closed on this article.

UK Debt Help and Advice | IVA help and advice | The truth about IVAs | Stay with Prague Hotels | Visit Spain with Barcelona Hotels

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »