Well there's a suprise.

location cowley road
TIME soon as it gets dark
Job Painton out on sale
£20 a job police gets 50% off
its not hard to find her is it

khan wrote:
location cowley road TIME soon as it gets dark Job Painton out on sale £20 a job police gets 50% off its not hard to find her is it

Maybe it is the same gang of young Pakistani men that are on bail for kidnap in Oxford?

khan wrote:
location cowley road TIME soon as it gets dark Job Painton out on sale £20 a job police gets 50% off its not hard to find her is it

It was only a tenner last timne I partook of services rendered.

ALL IN!

Must visit the Churchill soon.

Probably be found face down in the Oxford Canal, another job for Inspector Lewis, good job he's got a 3rd series.

More proof that ASBO's are useless! Perhaps if authorities had jailed her for prostitution, which the last time I checked is against the law, she wouldn't be out plying her trade. All the ASBO did is move her to another street and made her another neighborhood's problem.

Maybe the police should set a humane trap for her, using some crack as bait. Better still, leave a trail of cocaine that leads directly to the police station to help lure her in.

This is a human being you are writing about.
No wonder humanity is becoming so depraved.
Show some compassion less one day you may all fall on harder times

Delancey wrote:
More proof that ASBO's are useless! Perhaps if authorities had jailed her for prostitution, which the last time I checked is against the law, she wouldn't be out plying her trade. All the ASBO did is move her to another street and made her another neighborhood's problem.

...and what about the men who go to her? aren't they the problem REALLY? let us think about it.. you want to get rid of prostitution, right? well, my thinking is, if men stopped using these girls then they would be out of business right? Surely you're no that stupid.. are you? Men are the problem here.

I have to say I agree with Mark. If you take away the business then these girls wouldn't be doing this. I wonder why men do go to girls who clearly have problems with drugs. Aren't they the ones we should be putting into question? Maybe it's the men that should be getting the ASBO's...

Dave wrote:
Maybe the police should set a humane trap for her, using some crack as bait. Better still, leave a trail of cocaine that leads directly to the police station to help lure her in.

Makes a change from her using her crack as bait!

Delancey wrote:
More proof that ASBO's are useless! Perhaps if authorities had jailed her for prostitution, which the last time I checked is against the law, she wouldn't be out plying her trade. All the ASBO did is move her to another street and made her another neighborhood's problem.

Prostitution is legal. Soliciting isn't. Important legal distinction.

I think her problem was that she realised she was about to get banged up, but without being paid for it, she had better offers elsewhere.

Any day now i expect the cannibalism of the homeless to make these hallowed pages.

The Catholics traditionally turn up in numbers where cannibalism is occuring and occording to this very publication they have been gaining ingress of late.

Maybe not as bad as Pre Columus Mexico or just possibly the Philipines though.

i think you bunch of masoginists should put your own houses in order before you judge amy. i am sure she has caused plenty of suffering for neighbours of the properties she has used, but come on, she is a vulnerable drug-addicted female who has fallen so low that she has used the only thing she has (her body) to get what she NEEDS (drugs). if i had my way there would be warrants issued for all of you idiots who are implying you have used amy's services for abusing a young vulnerable female.

claire wrote:
i think you bunch of masoginists should put your own houses in order before you judge amy. i am sure she has caused plenty of suffering for neighbours of the properties she has used, but come on, she is a vulnerable drug-addicted female who has fallen so low that she has used the only thing she has (her body) to get what she NEEDS (drugs). if i had my way there would be warrants issued for all of you idiots who are implying you have used amy's services for abusing a young vulnerable female.

Don't use words you can't spell.

The government knows the answer to these problems, why not give a mandatory 3 month rehab sentence in a secure location for anyone caught taking class A drugs? If they end up back on it, make it 6 months next time & so on. Somewhere that they are FORCED to go cold turkey, it's quite simple & 3 months later the users would be the most grateful of all, no criminal record needs to be created to give them a better chance after recovery, the same thing should be done to any women caught on the streets selling themselves, I think this government knows ways to sort out all of these social problems but why would they if there is no short term financial benefit to them? Our government benefits financially from the sale of drugs, no matter what anyone says, otherwise how would drugs get into the country in the first place? Its easily solved if you put the right measures in place. The said 3 month rehab programme, life sentences for class A traffickers & dealers, let's get whores like this off the streets once & for all & start cleaning the streets of Britain!

claire wrote:
i think you bunch of masoginists should put your own houses in order before you judge amy. i am sure she has caused plenty of suffering for neighbours of the properties she has used, but come on, she is a vulnerable drug-addicted female who has fallen so low that she has used the only thing she has (her body) to get what she NEEDS (drugs). if i had my way there would be warrants issued for all of you idiots who are implying you have used amy's services for abusing a young vulnerable female.

I'm sure that without drugs she would be all sweetness and light.

I imagine she had some personal tragedy that made her turn to Smack etc.

But it is still largely her own responsibility that she ended up like that.

Junkies are forever telling us that their habits are harmless and they are in control and resent being pitied for engaging in their little recreational activity.

So they should be judged according to those standards and not pitied or cried over. Its what they want.

M wrote:
The government knows the answer to these problems, why not give a mandatory 3 month rehab sentence in a secure location for anyone caught taking class A drugs? If they end up back on it, make it 6 months next time & so on. Somewhere that they are FORCED to go cold turkey, it's quite simple & 3 months later the users would be the most grateful of all, no criminal record needs to be created to give them a better chance after recovery, the same thing should be done to any women caught on the streets selling themselves, I think this government knows ways to sort out all of these social problems but why would they if there is no short term financial benefit to them? Our government benefits financially from the sale of drugs, no matter what anyone says, otherwise how would drugs get into the country in the first place? Its easily solved if you put the right measures in place. The said 3 month rehab programme, life sentences for class A traffickers & dealers, let's get whores like this off the streets once & for all & start cleaning the streets of Britain!

But that would put all those highly trained bourgeois drugs councillours out of business. That's why, apart from supporting criminal gangs financially, the usual arguments used by councillours are "harm reductive".

Face it people make nice cosy livings out of this **** being dealt, we can't have them out of work can we.

claire wrote:
i think you bunch of masoginists should put your own houses in order before you judge amy. i am sure she has caused plenty of suffering for neighbours of the properties she has used, but come on, she is a vulnerable drug-addicted female who has fallen so low that she has used the only thing she has (her body) to get what she NEEDS (drugs). if i had my way there would be warrants issued for all of you idiots who are implying you have used amy's services for abusing a young vulnerable female.

I won't use words i can't spell if you find something better to do than sitting around criticising (correct spelling? do i care?)people who have bothered to comment on something they feel passionate about.

What's truly staggering is that men will pay money to have sex with - that .

You couldn't pay me enough...

Alan Page wrote:

claire wrote: i think you bunch of masoginists should put your own houses in order before you judge amy. i am sure she has caused plenty of suffering for neighbours of the properties she has used, but come on, she is a vulnerable drug-addicted female who has fallen so low that she has used the only thing she has (her body) to get what she NEEDS (drugs). if i had my way there would be warrants issued for all of you idiots who are implying you have used amy\\\'s services for abusing a young vulnerable female.

I\\\'m sure that without drugs she would be all sweetness and light. I imagine she had some personal tragedy that made her turn to Smack etc. But it is still largely her own responsibility that she ended up like that. Junkies are forever telling us that their habits are harmless and they are in control and resent being pitied for engaging in their little recreational activity. So they should be judged according to those standards and not pitied or cried over. Its what they want.

i am not pitying amy, and i'm not sure where you are getting your facts about what junkies are 'forever telling us'/what they want.

claire wrote:

claire wrote:
i think you bunch of masoginists should put your own houses in order before you judge amy. i am sure she has caused plenty of suffering for neighbours of the properties she has used, but come on, she is a vulnerable drug-addicted female who has fallen so low that she has used the only thing she has (her body) to get what she NEEDS (drugs). if i had my way there would be warrants issued for all of you idiots who are implying you have used amy's services for abusing a young vulnerable female.

I won't use words i can't spell if you find something better to do than sitting around criticising (correct spelling? do i care?)people who have bothered to comment on something they feel passionate about.

Only trying to help, but then, if you don't care...

Tom she is not pakistani white english

to all tho's who have juged amy look at your self i no her and her family she is a sweet person. only god can judge this girl not u posh snods who dont no wot its like livin in da ends live in her shoes for a day and see how hard life really is with no money no posh cars and a big house u people have NO idea wot its like on the sreet.

ever body has something to say about her the only person she is hurting is her self .she needs help.you never no it could be your kids or good mate that ends up going down that road then what would you say .. some pimp could be making her do this .. lets hope she is safe you just dont no

Isn't it sickening that these men are making nasty, cheap comments about a young woman going through a dreadful time. Do none of you have daughters? This woman has been humiliated by this newspaper and the editor should be addressing the fact that while he prints her picture he is publishing advertisements daily for women plying the same trade under a different name.
Who keeps this industry going? MEN. Yet it is men who are talking about this woman as if she is not a human being. Her life is worth just as much as any of yours. Her family are bound to be experiencing the fear and shame, pain and degradation that she is. But while you're calling her names and having your little jokes at her expense, ask yourself 'Who commits rape, domestic violence, 'honour killings'?' The same type of man as those who pay vulnerable girls for sex.

Women have been voting for nearly 100 years.

It's the single white male who is lowest priority for help these days.

Looks like he has been joined by the single white woman.

Don't it make yer proud.

street gal wrote:
to all tho\'s who have juged amy look at your self i no her and her family she is a sweet person. only god can judge this girl not u posh snods who dont no wot its like livin in da ends live in her shoes for a day and see how hard life really is with no money no posh cars and a big house u people have NO idea wot its like on the sreet.

The wonders of an education under Labour

christine wrote:
Isn't it sickening that these men are making nasty, cheap comments about a young woman going through a dreadful time. Do none of you have daughters? This woman has been humiliated by this newspaper and the editor should be addressing the fact that while he prints her picture he is publishing advertisements daily for women plying the same trade under a different name. Who keeps this industry going? MEN. Yet it is men who are talking about this woman as if she is not a human being. Her life is worth just as much as any of yours. Her family are bound to be experiencing the fear and shame, pain and degradation that she is. But while you're calling her names and having your little jokes at her expense, ask yourself 'Who commits rape, domestic violence, 'honour killings'?' The same type of man as those who pay vulnerable girls for sex.

Whilst I agree with some of your comments I would challenge your closing chapters - Rape by definition men , although you only have to read the headlines in this paper to see another poor sod's name dragged through the mud with no evidence , domestic Violence works both ways , men suffer from this as well as women , Honour killings - well thats your Muslims , Most of the drugs in this country are imported - thats your foreigners, your govenment and the weak minds of the people who use fault.Why is soliciting illegal , it is an exchange of service for payment. Perhaps if the prossies were all arested all those men who cant get sex unless pay for it would turn into mad rapists - who knows . Why is street prostitution Iliegal but Escorts are not ?

The scottish labour government have totally ruined this country and they haven't finished yet. This country always goes down the sshhitter under labour and people still vote them in, you get what you deserve.

Tom wrote:

khan wrote: location cowley road TIME soon as it gets dark Job Painton out on sale £20 a job police gets 50% off its not hard to find her is it

Maybe it is the same gang of young Pakistani men that are on bail for kidnap in Oxford?

tom the nazi tw*t
what the f*ck has that got to do with anything.
you stupid basta*d

claire wrote:

Alan Page wrote:

claire wrote: i think you bunch of masoginists should put your own houses in order before you judge amy. i am sure she has caused plenty of suffering for neighbours of the properties she has used, but come on, she is a vulnerable drug-addicted female who has fallen so low that she has used the only thing she has (her body) to get what she NEEDS (drugs). if i had my way there would be warrants issued for all of you idiots who are implying you have used amy\\\'s services for abusing a young vulnerable female.

I\\\'m sure that without drugs she would be all sweetness and light. I imagine she had some personal tragedy that made her turn to Smack etc. But it is still largely her own responsibility that she ended up like that. Junkies are forever telling us that their habits are harmless and they are in control and resent being pitied for engaging in their little recreational activity. So they should be judged according to those standards and not pitied or cried over. Its what they want.

i am not pitying amy, and i'm not sure where you are getting your facts about what junkies are 'forever telling us'/what they want.

Conversations with militant bourgeois libertarian junkies.
"It's my body and I have the absolute right to do what I want with it and face the consequences myself etc etc".

John wrote:

christine wrote: Isn't it sickening that these men are making nasty, cheap comments about a young woman going through a dreadful time. Do none of you have daughters? This woman has been humiliated by this newspaper and the editor should be addressing the fact that while he prints her picture he is publishing advertisements daily for women plying the same trade under a different name. Who keeps this industry going? MEN. Yet it is men who are talking about this woman as if she is not a human being. Her life is worth just as much as any of yours. Her family are bound to be experiencing the fear and shame, pain and degradation that she is. But while you're calling her names and having your little jokes at her expense, ask yourself 'Who commits rape, domestic violence, 'honour killings'?' The same type of man as those who pay vulnerable girls for sex.

Whilst I agree with some of your comments I would challenge your closing chapters - Rape by definition men , although you only have to read the headlines in this paper to see another poor sod's name dragged through the mud with no evidence , domestic Violence works both ways , men suffer from this as well as women , Honour killings - well thats your Muslims , Most of the drugs in this country are imported - thats your foreigners, your govenment and the weak minds of the people who use fault.Why is soliciting illegal , it is an exchange of service for payment. Perhaps if the prossies were all arested all those men who cant get sex unless pay for it would turn into mad rapists - who knows . Why is street prostitution Iliegal but Escorts are not ?

Yep, sex is simply a commodity, women are objects who's only aim is to defame men.
Clearly another right wing bnp supporter.
Soliciting is illegal because it is antisocial wheras an escort agency isn't.

Alan Page wrote:

John wrote:

christine wrote: Isn't it sickening that these men are making nasty, cheap comments about a young woman going through a dreadful time. Do none of you have daughters? This woman has been humiliated by this newspaper and the editor should be addressing the fact that while he prints her picture he is publishing advertisements daily for women plying the same trade under a different name. Who keeps this industry going? MEN. Yet it is men who are talking about this woman as if she is not a human being. Her life is worth just as much as any of yours. Her family are bound to be experiencing the fear and shame, pain and degradation that she is. But while you're calling her names and having your little jokes at her expense, ask yourself 'Who commits rape, domestic violence, 'honour killings'?' The same type of man as those who pay vulnerable girls for sex.

Whilst I agree with some of your comments I would challenge your closing chapters - Rape by definition men , although you only have to read the headlines in this paper to see another poor sod's name dragged through the mud with no evidence , domestic Violence works both ways , men suffer from this as well as women , Honour killings - well thats your Muslims , Most of the drugs in this country are imported - thats your foreigners, your govenment and the weak minds of the people who use fault.Why is soliciting illegal , it is an exchange of service for payment. Perhaps if the prossies were all arested all those men who cant get sex unless pay for it would turn into mad rapists - who knows . Why is street prostitution Iliegal but Escorts are not ?

Yep, sex is simply a commodity, women are objects who's only aim is to defame men.
Clearly another right wing bnp supporter.
Soliciting is illegal because it is antisocial wheras an escort agency isn't.

Alan, old boy, I doubt all right-wingers are BNP supporters.

Here he goes again, Alan Page and his 'bourgeois'
come on Alan, don't you know any other words you gimp?

David wrote:

Alan Page wrote:

John wrote:

christine wrote: Isn't it sickening that these men are making nasty, cheap comments about a young woman going through a dreadful time. Do none of you have daughters? This woman has been humiliated by this newspaper and the editor should be addressing the fact that while he prints her picture he is publishing advertisements daily for women plying the same trade under a different name. Who keeps this industry going? MEN. Yet it is men who are talking about this woman as if she is not a human being. Her life is worth just as much as any of yours. Her family are bound to be experiencing the fear and shame, pain and degradation that she is. But while you're calling her names and having your little jokes at her expense, ask yourself 'Who commits rape, domestic violence, 'honour killings'?' The same type of man as those who pay vulnerable girls for sex.

Whilst I agree with some of your comments I would challenge your closing chapters - Rape by definition men , although you only have to read the headlines in this paper to see another poor sod's name dragged through the mud with no evidence , domestic Violence works both ways , men suffer from this as well as women , Honour killings - well thats your Muslims , Most of the drugs in this country are imported - thats your foreigners, your govenment and the weak minds of the people who use fault.Why is soliciting illegal , it is an exchange of service for payment. Perhaps if the prossies were all arested all those men who cant get sex unless pay for it would turn into mad rapists - who knows . Why is street prostitution Iliegal but Escorts are not ?

Yep, sex is simply a commodity, women are objects who's only aim is to defame men. Clearly another right wing bnp supporter. Soliciting is illegal because it is antisocial wheras an escort agency isn't.

Alan, old boy, I doubt all right-wingers are BNP supporters.

No but the BNP are all rightwingers so the distinction is valid.

jamie wrote:
Here he goes again, Alan Page and his 'bourgeois' come on Alan, don't you know any other words you gimp?

Lady Ottoline Morell country!!! By jove, I've come over all Lytton Strachey.
Probably lost on Jamie, but what the hell.

Alan Page wrote:

claire wrote:

Alan Page wrote:

claire wrote: i think you bunch of masoginists should put your own houses in order before you judge amy. i am sure she has caused plenty of suffering for neighbours of the properties she has used, but come on, she is a vulnerable drug-addicted female who has fallen so low that she has used the only thing she has (her body) to get what she NEEDS (drugs). if i had my way there would be warrants issued for all of you idiots who are implying you have used amy\\\\\\\'s services for abusing a young vulnerable female.

I\\\\\\\'m sure that without drugs she would be all sweetness and light. I imagine she had some personal tragedy that made her turn to Smack etc. But it is still largely her own responsibility that she ended up like that. Junkies are forever telling us that their habits are harmless and they are in control and resent being pitied for engaging in their little recreational activity. So they should be judged according to those standards and not pitied or cried over. Its what they want.

i am not pitying amy, and i\'m not sure where you are getting your facts about what junkies are \'forever telling us\'/what they want.

Conversations with militant bourgeois libertarian junkies. \"It\'s my body and I have the absolute right to do what I want with it and face the consequences myself etc etc\".

Militant? Bourgeois? Libertarian? Get a grip mate, these are not the type of people we are talking about! We are talking about a young woman in the grips of a serious, mentally debilitating addiction which it will take her many many years to recover from. In fact it will probably be years before she even gets to the point of entering recovery. I really wonder about some people's motivation in writing comments on stories such as this when you are (despite being very wordy and probably highly educated) ill-informed on the subject.

claire wrote:

Alan Page wrote:

claire wrote:

Alan Page wrote:

claire wrote: i think you bunch of masoginists should put your own houses in order before you judge amy. i am sure she has caused plenty of suffering for neighbours of the properties she has used, but come on, she is a vulnerable drug-addicted female who has fallen so low that she has used the only thing she has (her body) to get what she NEEDS (drugs). if i had my way there would be warrants issued for all of you idiots who are implying you have used amy\\\\\\\'s services for abusing a young vulnerable female.

I\\\\\\\'m sure that without drugs she would be all sweetness and light. I imagine she had some personal tragedy that made her turn to Smack etc. But it is still largely her own responsibility that she ended up like that. Junkies are forever telling us that their habits are harmless and they are in control and resent being pitied for engaging in their little recreational activity. So they should be judged according to those standards and not pitied or cried over. Its what they want.

i am not pitying amy, and i\'m not sure where you are getting your facts about what junkies are \'forever telling us\'/what they want.

Conversations with militant bourgeois libertarian junkies. \"It\'s my body and I have the absolute right to do what I want with it and face the consequences myself etc etc\".

Militant? Bourgeois? Libertarian? Get a grip mate, these are not the type of people we are talking about! We are talking about a young woman in the grips of a serious, mentally debilitating addiction which it will take her many many years to recover from. In fact it will probably be years before she even gets to the point of entering recovery. I really wonder about some people's motivation in writing comments on stories such as this when you are (despite being very wordy and probably highly educated) ill-informed on the subject.

And your point is?

These substances are prohibited because they tend to **** people over.

Arrogant pillocks believe they have the god given right to blow these things out of their arses in the name of personal freedom.

This is the result.

If you play with matches you get your fingers burnt.

Most junkies I have had contact with see nothing wrong with their condition and regard all criticism as gestapo like fascism. "You probablynthink I'm crawling around the floor lol but I do smack regularly and I can hold a top job, smokings far more dangerous etc etc."

Yes it may take her many years to recover but nobody asked her to play around with the crap in the first place.

street gal wrote:
to all tho's who have juged amy look at your self i no her and her family she is a sweet person. only god can judge this girl not u posh snods who dont no wot its like livin in da ends live in her shoes for a day and see how hard life really is with no money no posh cars and a big house u people have NO idea wot its like on the sreet.

The wonders of an education under Gordon Brown

Alan, my point is this. Historically there have always been heroin/opium users from the middle classes ('hippycrites') who do indeed waffle on about choices, owning their own body etc. But that is not what we are talking about! Have you ever met someone like Amy Paintin? I doubt you have, because of your lack of understanding of the different issues she faces to these militant/libertarian
/blah blah blah individuals you refer to. Society should support people like Amy, because she is never going to change her life alone. When you are in the grips of an addiction to heroin and/or crack cocaine, you don't sit around pondering lifes big questions, coming up with theories about your rights over your own body! It's all a lot darker and much more depressing than that. I wish you could make the distinction between two very different kinds of people. Lumping all drug users into a 'one size fits all' category is dangerous and doesn't help anyone.

Every soul deserves sympathy, and society needs to help the disadvantaged, and the vulnerable. We need dug addiction programmes that are humane and that have been demonstrated scientifically and empirically to work with a high success rate.
Hopefully such things exist, or maybe one day they will be developed. In the meantime it's a matter of damage control, and simply trying to stop the harm that's already been done, from spilling out across the community and affecting and damaging other families and neighborhoods. Action needs to be compassionate but effective. ASBOs are one way of working with people to try to firmly reduce the damage done to the community, which would only in turn produce more problem families, more troubled individuals, and new generations of damaged people.