News RSS Feed


Surveillance 'breached human rights'

6:27pm Thursday 1st May 2008

comment Comments (2)   Have your say »


The High Court yesterday heard that the Metropolitan Police's policy of routinely photographing anti-arms fair activists was a breach of human rights, in a case brought by an Oxford man.

Campaign Against Arms Trade member Andrew Wood was photographed while attending the annual meeting of publisher and arms fair organiser Reed Elsevier, at the Millennium Hotel, in Grosvenor Square, London, in April 2005, after buying a share in the company.

Before yesterday's hearing, Mr Wood said: "I hope this legal action will safeguard our rights to privacy, freedom of assembly and other rights enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and in English law."

Martin Westgate, appearing for Mr Wood, told the court: "He asked one question. His behaviour was completely unexceptional, although there was a small disturbance and two other people were ejected."

But he was openly followed by police who took his photograph.

The police said the decision to take his picture was made after Mr Wood was seen speaking to one of the people who had been ejected.

Mr Westgate said: "It may well be that a group of police officers may consider this was behaving in an entirely amicable, non-intimidatory way, but that is not the way it appears on the receiving end.

"It would be unrealistic to assume that someone in Mr Wood's position would not regard this conduct as being unsettling."

Mr Wood's lawyers are seeking a ruling that this type of surveillance violates human rights.

The Met argue the policy was a legitimate way of preventing crime.

The hearing continues.


Your Say YourOxford Mail

Adrian Appley., Bromley, Kent says...
10:49pm Mon 5 May 08

We animal rights activists are being filmed and photographed CONTINUOUSLY whilst at various demo's around the country so are our rights also being denied us ? I need to know.

Phil Senior, says...
7:58pm Tue 6 May 08

"Gathering intelligence" is the usual explanation which police give when confronted by anyone who objects to being rudely and inordinately filmed. On the one occasion when I photographed a police officer behaving rather badly towards an innocuous member of the public doing nothing at all I was faced with indignation and a threat to seize my camera! Perhaps we should all do likewise - they'd soon have to rethink their silly manners and customs.

Comments are closed on this article.

UK Debt Help and Advice | IVA help and advice | The truth about IVAs | Stay with Prague Hotels | Visit Spain with Barcelona Hotels

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »