News RSS Feed


Parents fight mast plan

5:36pm Sunday 7th October 2007

comment Comments (8)   Have your say »


A community has joined forces with a primary school to fight plans for a mobile phone mast.

Mobile giant T-Mobile plans to install a 10-metre mast and ground base equipment 100 metres from St Andrew's Primary School in Headington, Oxford.

Neighbours are angry about the location of the mast and want the company to find an alternative site - even though it has won planning permission.

A petition has been launched against the mast and received strong support from parents at the primary school in London Road.

The petition, which has been placed in the school's reception, has already got almost 500 signatures and residents and parents are hoping their voices will be heard.

Peter Rainbird, community governor for the school, said there had been strong parental concern over the issue.

Dr Rainbird, 40, said: "There has not been conclusive proof either way regarding the health aspects of masts and parents are concerned about the issue this represents.

"We do not want to get into a scientific debate with T-Mobile over this, but we would like to sit down and discuss with the company whether they would be willing to find an alternative site."

Oxford City Council initially refused permission on grounds it would clutter the street scene and fell within the boundary of the Old Headington Conservation Area.

Mel Davenport, 35, whose five-year-old son Oliver goes to St Andrew's, said: "This isn't just about children who go to the school, it's about all the children who use Bury Knowle.

"We do not want our children to be playing in the shadow of this phone mast."

Michelle Stephenson, 38, whose daughter Lucie, six, and son Alex, four, go to the school, said: "I don't understand why T-Mobile has to build it so close to a school.

"The Government says there is no evidence that they cause harm, but who knows what we will find in the future.

"Look at our attitude to smoking and how that has changed."

London Road resident Katalin Jambor, who organised the petition, is baffled over why the council's objections were not taken into consideration by the planning inspectorate at appeal.

Mrs Jambor, 76, said: "It makes me feel very angry that this mast could go ahead.

"It will obstruct the pavement and could be very dangerous for pedestrians during the peak hours when this stretch of road is very busy with children going to and from school."

T-Mobile said it was unable to comment.


Your Say YourOxford Mail

Andy, says...
9:12am Mon 8 Oct 07

What a load of NIMBY'S. Most of these people protesting have a mobile phone, but its alright to place the masts anywhere but near me. Throw your mobile phones away then you can protest. Bunch of NIMBY'S

Peter, Oxford says...
9:32am Mon 8 Oct 07

What a load of NIMBY'S. Most of these people protesting have a mobile phone, but its alright to place the masts anywhere but near me. Throw your mobile phones away then you can protest. Bunch of NIMBY'S


Your back garden it is then, Andy.

lisa, oxford says...
10:13am Mon 8 Oct 07

What a load of NIMBY'S. Most of these people protesting have a mobile phone, but its alright to place the masts anywhere but near me. Throw your mobile phones away then you can protest. Bunch of NIMBY's
I couldn't agree more. I bet even all the children at the school whose parents are protesting have mobile phones too! Also I cant see how it can obstruct the pavement. Dont they have street lights in Headington? The mobile phone masts where I live look exactly the same, and you dont notice them unless your really looking.

lisa, oxford says...
10:16am Mon 8 Oct 07

Also I'd quite happily have a mast in my back garden. These phone companies pay a lot of money to people who do-about £5000 a year so I'm told. Bring it on I say.

C, says...
12:13pm Mon 8 Oct 07

lisa wrote:
Also I'd quite happily have a mast in my back garden. These phone companies pay a lot of money to people who do-about £5000 a year so I'm told. Bring it on I say.
Good luck when it's time to sell your house, though.

I'm always a bit surprised at the ire of mobile phone addicts when this comes up; who cares if the signal's slightly worse than it might be? Life goes on.

Mast, Oxford says...
1:09pm Mon 8 Oct 07

C, if your landline or telly signal worked sporadically you'd be justifiably annoyed. Mobile phones are as much a fact of modern life as other communication devices, and yet its users are expected to put up with poor service just to satisfy the prejudices of parents who probably drive their little darlings to school in cars.

I have to stand in the road to get a signal as my phone doesn't work in the house, meaning my neighbours are familiar with many aspects of my personal life. You have to wonder what century we are lliving in.

fred, says...
2:30pm Mon 8 Oct 07

Mast, if your at home use your landline!! its cheaper as well

Mast, Oxford says...
3:04pm Mon 8 Oct 07

Fred, how d'you work that one out? Calls on my mobile are free, while those on my landline are not - neither does my landline store 200 numbers, neither can it send photos!

The mobile phone is a great modern invention and I object to being dictated to, to stop using it, by people without science on their side.

Comments are closed on this article.

UK Debt Help and Advice | IVA help and advice | The truth about IVAs | Stay with Prague Hotels | Visit Spain with Barcelona Hotels

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »