News RSS Feed


County could get nuclear station

12:23pm Thursday 24th May 2007

comment Comments (17)   Have your say »


Fears of a nuclear power station being built in Oxfordshire were mounting today as the Didcot area emerged as a likely site.

Harwell was included as a "key opportunity for nuclear development" in a report as the Government begins planning for a new generation of nuclear power stations.

Didcot, as an existing power station, could also be considered as a potential site for a nuclear power station, according to a Government paper.

advertisement The report, commissioned from a leading energy analyst, sets out why sites in Oxfordshire should be looked at among favoured locations in the South of England.

The report urges the Government to focus on existing civil nuclear licensed sites, such as Harwell.

The atomic research site at Harwell is viewed as one of the best available locations.

But alarm in Oxfordshire will be intensified by news that nearby Didcot Power Station is also mentioned as a possible site - meaning that the county has two potential sites for a nuclear power station.

For the consultants say that conventional power station sites should also be carefully considered.

The report, by Jackson Consulting, was commissioned by the Department of Trade and Industry.

Consultants say that a new power station would require vast cooling towers "as used by conventional coal and gas fired generating stations such as Didcot in Oxfordshire".

It suggests that building a nuclear power station on such a site would avoid many problems and some of the public protests that would likely arise elsewhere in the country.

The report says: "Cooling towers are very large structures which substantially damage the local amenity value from visual intrusion, causing significant difficulties with local public acceptance, as well as adding to the cost of construction and reducing the station's power output three to five per cent."

According to the Jackson report, ease of connection to the national grid is the main factor in determining a site's suitability.

Ed Vaizey, the Conservative MP for Wantage and Didcot, said he had received no advanced warning of the report.

He said: "It does not surprise me that Didcot and Harwell have been put in the frame for the next generation of nuclear power stations.

"My constituency already supplies a third of the power for the South East and drives the South East's economy. The Government also wants us to supply half of London's water.

"But this is a research exercise. It is a million miles from being a firm proposal. But obviously we must be prepared for any proposal in the future."

The report was submitted to the DTI last year.

But efforts by Greenpeace to use the freedom of information rules to make it public were repeatedly blocked.

The study was finally disclosed as the Government published its latest energy white paper.

Greenpeace director John Saven said: "The list of preferred sites for new build in this report is a matter of national interest, not just something for civil servants to see. It is scandalous the Government was going to keep it under wraps."

Craig Simmons, leader of the Green Party on Oxfordshire County Council, said: "This suggests that Oxfordshire is the most likely inland site for a nuclear power station.

"Having a nuclear power station on Oxford's door steps highlights many issues of safety. It is an inappropriate site."

Neville Harris, county councillor for Didcot South, said: "There must be a huge and proper debate.

"And the outcome of this debate must not be prejudged. I know a lot of people will want to talk about renewable energy.

"Politicians at all levels must not abdicate their responsibility by seeking to privatise important environmental decisions."

Local people were appalled and surprised by the news that they could have a nuclear power station on their doorstep.

Tessa Avenell, of Harwell, said: "I am pretty shocked about this. I didn't know anything about it, so I am very surprised.

"I would consider moving if they built a nuclear power station near here."

Joyce Norton, of Barrow Park, Harwell, said: "I have been here for seven years and I really like it. I wouldn't be at all happy if they built something like that here."

Oxford Friends of the Earth spokesman, Andrew Wood, said: "It's largely speculation at the moment, if there would be a nuclear power station at Harwell, or indeed elsewhere in Oxfordshire.

"The Government is missing a golden opportunity to make the UK a world leader in developing a safe, clean and low-carbon future.

"Building new nuclear plants would be a costly, dangerous and ineffective way to cut UK carbon emissions.

"It would also divert valuable resources from sustainable solutions for tackling climate change.

"The Government should set out ambitious policies on energy efficiency, renewable power, carbon capture and cleaner systems of transport.

"Unfortunately, ministers have been taken in by the nuclear lobby yet again."

The DTI said the report's conclusions were those of the consultants and it was too early to consider the siting of any potential new stations.

Of the UK's 19 existing civil nuclear power station sites, only nine are considered feasible for new reactors, and only four are immediately available.

The report adds that new stations are unlikely to be feasible in Wales and Scotland because of devolution.

Industry Secretary Alistair Darling said it would be a profound mistake to rule out nuclear energy at a time of dwindling North Sea oil and gas supplies and pressure to tackle green house gas emissions.


Your Say YourOxford Mail

C, says...
12:56pm Thu 24 May 07

Ah, a guaranteed way of bringing all the usual NIMBYs out of the woodwork. Am I the only person who doesn't mind a nuclear power station in my neighbourhood, or have I been taken in by the noisy minority who claim they speak for everyone?

And please, no patronising comments about why I "shouldn't" be happy about the idea--I can make up my own mind, thank you very much.

Neil, Oxford says...
1:50pm Thu 24 May 07

I oppose nuclear powere stations being built in Oxfordshire or anywhere else.

There is a strong environemntal case against them and an even stronger financial one.

Not being a NIMBY, however, I strongly support the development of more wind turbines in the County, the relaxation of planning restrictions on micro-generation and would be open-minded about a power from waste plant being developed at Didcot.

All these things are less environmentally damaging and more cost-effective than going nuclear.

Alan Crowder, Oxford says...
2:06pm Thu 24 May 07

C, I agree with you, if Nuclear power is the way to go and we can forget solar and wind then bring it on, Didcot is big enough to handle it and the jobs would be safe. I have no doubt it would be safe. My vote is a big YES.

barry, oxford says...
2:21pm Thu 24 May 07

"Building new nuclear plants would be a costly, dangerous and ineffective way to cut UK carbon emissions.

Why is a nuclear power station an ineffective way to cut carbon emissions? Surely as opposed to a coal fired power station it produces less carbon emissions. Meaning carbon emissions have been cut. Not that I really believe in man-made climate change anyway

Kathryn, Oxford says...
2:45pm Thu 24 May 07

Are they really safe next to a residential area? I saw that Mark Thomas programme where he took a geiger counter along the railway by Sellafield. It was terrifying. I have no specific objection to nuclear power, it's the motivation and professionalism of the people running it that worries me.

Sideshow Bob, Abingdon says...
3:16pm Thu 24 May 07

I don't mind either, although I guess house prices in the area might suffer. Don't nuclear power stations require a LOT of water, which is why they tend to be on the coast. Aha -I see, there are plans for a reservoir near Didcot! Just a coincidence?

Rebecca, Oxford says...
3:24pm Thu 24 May 07

There is background radiation all around us - you get it in the rocks, soil and even from your TV and computer, and every time you fly you get an increased radiation dose from cosmic rays. Background radiation counts are perfectly normal. I didn't see the Mark Thomas program, but did he show you the geiger counter readings in an area well away from Sellafield as well, as a comparison?

People who work in nuclear power stations are very conscious of problems with radiation - they work inside the building at a much high risk then people outside, they are not going to risk getting over-exposed. Among many other precautions they take, they wear special badges that detect how much radiation is in the atmosphere where they work so they can make sure that it remains within safe levels.

Another interesting fact for those worried about nuclear waste is that if the electricity used by one person throughout their lifetime was generated by nuclear fuel, the amount of highly radioactive waste produced, once processed, would be small enough to fit in the palm of your hand.

I'm not saying nuclear energy is marvellous and will solve all our problems (I personally feel, other, renewable energy should be our answer, not more nuclear power stations). All I'm saying is that many people have entirely the wrong view of nuclear energy and have a gut reaction against it, whereas if they knew the facts they may feel entirely different about it.

Phil Gale, Oxford says...
3:30pm Thu 24 May 07

I've heard it said that coal powered power stations emit more radioactive material than nuclear powered ones -- because of all the radioisotopes locked into the coal. On that basis, converting Didcot to nuclear could be the best thing for south Oxfordshire.

Neil, Oxford says...
3:39pm Thu 24 May 07

Another interesting fact for those worried about nuclear waste is that if the electricity used by one person throughout their lifetime was generated by nuclear fuel, the amount of highly radioactive waste produced, once processed, would be small enough to fit in the palm of your hand.

So, overall, that is a pretty big pile of highly radioactive waste for the population as a whole.

No wonder it is so expensive to deal with the stuff.

Rebecca, oxford says...
3:55pm Thu 24 May 07

Ah but Neil, nuclear power only provides about 11% of the World's energy, not 100%, so a lot less waste is produced per person than the amount I mentioned.

It is a problem, don't get me wrong, but it is not as vast a problem as people tend to believe. The majority of nuclear waste produced is less radioactive than some rocks in Cornwall!

David, Abingdon says...
9:35am Fri 25 May 07

Hello. Having read the energy white paper, it has a line in it that says "Coal fired power stations, such as at Didcot, could be converted to nuclear". Then later there is a list of potential sites, and Didcot is not on it. For some reason the Oxford Times has made headline news out of the fact that Didcot was being used as an example of a coal fired power station. There is not a plan to turn Didcot nuclear, and the energy paper does not say that there is.

Francis, Oxon says...
1:06pm Fri 25 May 07

David wrote:
Hello. Having read the energy white paper, it has a line in it that says \\\\\\\"Coal fired power stations, such as at Didcot, could be converted to nuclear\\\\\\\". Then later there is a list of potential sites, and Didcot is not on it. For some reason the Oxford Times has made headline news out of the fact that Didcot was being used as an example of a coal fired power station. There is not a plan to turn Didcot nuclear, and the energy paper does not say that there is.
I'd say the wording is a little ambiguous, but well spotted David! - it needs clarification. Nukes aren't normally built so close to residential areas.

Let's face it, the Mail doesn't have much to write about in Oxon - they have to do what they can with what they can....

jc, wallingford says...
1:24pm Fri 25 May 07

Neil wrote:
I oppose nuclear powere stations being built in Oxfordshire or anywhere else. There is a strong environemntal case against them and an even stronger financial one. Not being a NIMBY, however, I strongly support the development of more wind turbines in the County, the relaxation of planning restrictions on micro-generation and would be open-minded about a power from waste plant being developed at Didcot. All these things are less environmentally damaging and more cost-effective than going nuclear.
But Micro Wind turbines do not work! Due to the inadequate wind speed at the required heights around domestic houses and built up areas. This is proven in an independant report. For wind farms to meet the amount of electricity ONE power station generates you would have to carpet the whole of SOuth Oxfordshire in Wind turbines the height of which is at Green Park nr Reading. Would you want that? I certainly would not. I would prefer one Power station tucked away somewhere.

sam, didcot says...
1:27pm Fri 25 May 07

jc wrote:
Neil wrote: I oppose nuclear powere stations being built in Oxfordshire or anywhere else. There is a strong environemntal case against them and an even stronger financial one. Not being a NIMBY, however, I strongly support the development of more wind turbines in the County, the relaxation of planning restrictions on micro-generation and would be open-minded about a power from waste plant being developed at Didcot. All these things are less environmentally damaging and more cost-effective than going nuclear.
But Micro Wind turbines do not work! Due to the inadequate wind speed at the required heights around domestic houses and built up areas. This is proven in an independant report. For wind farms to meet the amount of electricity ONE power station generates you would have to carpet the whole of SOuth Oxfordshire in Wind turbines the height of which is at Green Park nr Reading. Would you want that? I certainly would not. I would prefer one Power station tucked away somewhere.
What about the damage and pollution produced from burning waste? that is not environmentally friendly? But as said anyways a Nuclear plant would not be built in Didcot, Because there is no large source of water nearby. The proposed Resivour at Drayton is for drinking water. If the power station used this then it would not be allowed to be used for drinking water.

Anon, Didcot says...
1:32pm Fri 25 May 07

Rebecca

The problem is people miss the bigger picture. Multiply that one ball of highly radioactive material you mentioned by 6 billion (current Global population). Now tell me you honestly belive that "it is not as vast a problem as people tend to believe." 6 billion balls of highly radioactive material!!!! Sheesh.

sam, didcot says...
4:35pm Fri 25 May 07

Anon wrote:
Rebecca The problem is people miss the bigger picture. Multiply that one ball of highly radioactive material you mentioned by 6 billion (current Global population). Now tell me you honestly belive that "it is not as vast a problem as people tend to believe." 6 billion balls of highly radioactive material!!!! Sheesh.
But we are not talking about the bigger picture here, we are talking about the UK energy requirements. The same thing happens with "Green issues" people rant and rave about the fact we need to cut back to save on c02 emissions but the UK barely emits 0.2% of The emissions of the worse 2 countries, China and the USA. Big difference we will make to GLOBAL warming..

V, Oxford says...
10:09am Mon 28 May 07

I have very mixed feelings about nuclear power. Believe it or not, it is remarkably safe, with regulations for nuclear stations being far more stringent than those for standard power stations. And accidents regarding nuclear power have been far less serious than those for other industries - Bhopal for example suffered 3,000 deaths from the initial incident with a further 15,000 deaths linked to the incident. Chernobyl experienced around 30 initial deaths and a further 4000 from radiation exposure. However, I believe that we need to first find a way of permanently dealing with our current nuclear waste legacy before we can even contemplate producing more. Long term storage just isnt good enough, particularly with current public perception of nuclear risk.

Comments are closed on this article.

UK Debt Help and Advice | IVA help and advice | The truth about IVAs | Stay with Prague Hotels | Visit Spain with Barcelona Hotels

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »