News RSS Feed


Relief as 'B52 Two' cleared

5:42pm Wednesday 23rd May 2007

comment Comments (2)   Have your say »


Peace campaigners who broke into an airbase intending to sabotage US Air Force B-52 bombers have spoken of their relief after avoiding a prison sentence.

Toby Olditch, 38, and Philip Pritchard, 36, denied conspiring to cause criminal damage, as they were trying to prevent 'war crimes'.

They admitted using bolt cutters to cut through a perimeter fence at RAF Fairford, in Gloucestershire, on March 18, 2003, the day before the Iraq war began.

They were cleared by a jury at Bristol Crown Court on Tuesday, after the judge advised that the jury did not have to decide the legality of the decision to go to war.

Builder Mr Olditch, pictured left, from Percy Street, East Oxford, said afterwards: "We have been waiting four years for this day. It demonstrates that the law really can come down to reasonableness."

Mr Pritchard, a carpenter from Campbell Road, East Oxford, said: "It's a great relief and a huge vote of confidence for anti-war protesters.

"The worst-case scenario for us would have been prison - but nothing compares to the horror that has been inflicted on innocent Iraqis."

The decision to acquit the two men, known as the B-52 Two, whose defence was that they were acting to prevent a crime, was welcomed by supporters.

Craig Simmons, leader of Oxford's Green group, said their decision to take "peaceful, direct action" was a response to frustration that all previous international pressure to prevent an 'illegal' war had come to nothing.

He added: "Greens everywhere are jumping for joy at this unanimous verdict.

"Toby and Phil are national heroes - they have stood up against a Government hell-bent on death and destruction and won."

The two men intended to damage the planes by clogging their engines, as well as sabotaging the runway, the jury heard.

This week's hearing was a retrial, after the first trial resulted in a hung jury.


Your Say YourOxford Mail

TC, Oxford says...
8:18am Fri 25 May 07

Am I right to think that the leader of the Green party is in fact praising these men for what amounts to vigilantism?

The definition of which is "One who takes or advocates the taking of law enforcement into one's own hands."

Because the international pressure did not stop the war, was it ok for these men to take matters into their own hands and possibly endanger the lives of the servicemen who give them the freedom to mount their international pressure in the first place?

Regardless if the Green party supports or protests the war, why does Mr Simmons think they have the right to use any means possible to stop it?

Natasha, says...
11:05am Fri 25 May 07

Think you'll find they were careful to stay on site and ensure no servicemen got into the craft or tried to fly it.

Comments are closed on this article.

UK Debt Help and Advice | IVA help and advice | The truth about IVAs | Stay with Prague Hotels | Visit Spain with Barcelona Hotels

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »