News RSS Feed


Inquiry off to stormy start

8:05am Tuesday 3rd April 2007

comment Comments (16)   Have your say »


Campaigners made angry outbursts yesterday as they began their final attempt to save a Radley lake from becoming a power station's dumping ground.

More than 80 people were at the first hearing of a four-day inquiry over whether to give village green status to two lakes at Thrupp and Bullfield lakes.

RWE npower has permission to dump spent fuel ash from its power station at Didcot into Thrupp Lake - but campaign group Save Radley Lakes says it should be blocked because the area is a beauty spot and recreation area.

RWE npower and two other landowners dispute that it has been used by many people over the past two decades - and that drew heckling from some campaigners at yesterday's inquiry at Radley College.

In his opening statement, RWE barrister Charles Mynors said there had been no recreational use of the lakes other than for angling by permission and occasional swimming, boating, canoeing, water and jet skiing by the previous owners.

Mr Mynors said: "I think over the years people's memories may have been coloured as to what activities actually took place on the lake."

His statement triggered cries of "rubbish", "nonsense" and "ridiculous" from SRL members.

Jo Cartmell, the Save Radley Lakes secretary, lodged the Village Green application with Oxfordshire County Council under the Commons Registration Act 1965.

In his opening statement on behalf of Mrs Cartmell, barrister Philip Petchey said: "The nature interest of the lakes site and its beauty are relevant.

"It is because of these things that people go there. If they go there it is to do things that will make the lakes registrable as a town or village green."

Mrs Cartmell said she and many people had used Thrupp and Bullfield lakes for a range of lawful sports and past times for more than 20 years.

She said: "It is a unique wildlife site whose future as a community resource deserves to be designated as a Town or Village Green."

Inquiry inspector Vivian Chapman said his function was to hear evidence and prepare a report setting out his findings and recommendation to Oxfordshire County Council, rather than making a decision himself.

Originally RWE npower wanted to use both lakes but dropped Bullfield, the smaller lake, from its planning application to the county council.

Campaigners want both lakes given village green status.


Your Say YourOxford Mail

jim, didcot says...
9:37am Tue 3 Apr 07

At last the truth comes out, that Radley Lakes have never been used to the level required for Town Green Status. The last time I went there it was full of burnt out cars and rubbish. I guess only 80 people turning up shows the true level of support in this area for the campaign.

sarah, oxford says...
9:38am Tue 3 Apr 07

Jim, I Agree with you. I guess the heckling by some people there shows how desperate they are and deep down that nPower are right.

nick abbott, didcot says...
10:29am Tue 3 Apr 07

What about the people of didcot?if the power station started sending the 300 ash lorries a week through the back gate and joined the A34 at oxford via Abingdon and Radley perhaps all the nimbys would change there mind.

Neil, Oxford says...
11:49am Tue 3 Apr 07

80 people is a big turnout for an inquiry like this. Most people work andcan't attend such things.

E, oxford says...
11:51am Tue 3 Apr 07

I learnt to sail on that lake 20 years ago with my grandad who has long since passed away. i think its a shame to see it go. all it needs is management and conservation, if it was a town green then there might actually be some money available from various sources to adapt it sympathetically and encourage people to visit once again

Bob Cowley, Botley says...
11:57am Tue 3 Apr 07

Come on now "Jim" and "Sarah", you're not fooling anybody with your fake messages.
The fact that you have to resort to such tactics as faking "debate" on a newspaper website just shows that you know you have no valid legal arguments to present at the official hearing.

Tony, Witney says...
12:47pm Tue 3 Apr 07

There are hundreds of acres of unmatured gravel pits - some still being dug - on the A40 between Oxford and Eynsham. Why destroy an established thing of beauty like Thrupp Lake (which I used to fish over 30 years ago) when there are other options available.
Also, if RWE can recycle 70% of their ash then surely they can recycle close to 100% with a little imagination?

Physicist, says...
3:30pm Tue 3 Apr 07

There are no burned out cars on the area for the town green, only on the part of the site that Npower pretend they have restored or are restored, or will restore one day if and when they get round to it.

Physicist, says...
3:44pm Tue 3 Apr 07

quote nick abbott, didcot on 10:29am today

What about the people of didcot?if the power station started sending the 300 ash lorries a week through the back gate and joined the A34 at oxford via Abingdon and Radley perhaps all the nimbys would change there mind.
What about the people of didcot?if the power station started sending the 300 ash lorries a week through the back gate and joined the A34 at oxford via Abingdon and Radley perhaps all the nimbys would change there mind.

Nick, let's have a look at these lorry stories - maybe myths, legends or fables would be a better description!
RWE npower plan to fill Thrupp Lake over a period of about 8 years, until 2015. Now they only have space in Thrupp for about half a million tonnes of ash so that's about63000 tonnes per year, or 1250 tonnes per week. That works out at about 50 lorries per week.
So which public relations manipulators worked out the other figure?

But before you say that 50 lorries a week is too much, please bear in mind that the last time someone counted the number of lorries per day going in and out of Didcot Power Station it was 60 each day. Adding 50 per week (or say 8 or 9 each day)to that would be noticeable but not huge.

Steve, Abingdon says...
4:44pm Tue 3 Apr 07

Its nice to see that someone fished the lakes 30 years ago and sailed on them 20 years ago. Last time I walked down to take some pictures (before the injunction) I found just two anglers looking miserable as sin so that made three of us. Ok I don't want them to go but village green? are you having a laugh?

nick, didcot says...
5:29pm Tue 3 Apr 07

sorry physicist its you dealing in theories and hypothetical tonnages
the power station currently run 30-35 lorries a day to a motorway project plus 20-30 tankers a day to block makers i know cause thay go past my door,now if it comes to cutting down on haulage(and all you green activists are keen on that)or filling radley pits(cause no matter what you decide to call them thats what they are)ill do my bit for the enviroment and cut down on the c02 emissions that are going past my front door.

Lakesaver, says...
5:34pm Tue 3 Apr 07

So a couple of NPower employees have amused themselves with their pointless comments. What do you morons expect at a Public Enquiry? 500 banner waving Radley inhabitants? - We did that for a public march. Most of the people are at work during the day. There are people there who have given up their annual holidays to listen to the witness evidence. That is dedication. Easy to sit in judgement on a matter about which you know nothing. Harder still to present evidence and deliver it for cross examination.

M Jones, says...
6:07pm Tue 3 Apr 07

Of course, if the ash were to be put into the existing landfill at Sutton Courtenay, where there is spare capacity, then it could go via pipeline so no extra lorries at all.
As for the alleged lack of support for the Save Radley Lakes campaign- lol you lot are clutching at straws! If npower could get over 500 people out to demonstrate in support or over a thousand to sign a petition on the No. 10 website, then we might take you more seriously. Save Radley Lakes has done all this and more. Don't underestimate the level of public opposition to this philistine scheme.

Physicist, says...
9:25pm Tue 3 Apr 07

Hello Nick from Npower. If you want to do your bit for the environment then check your facts please. If Npower recycled their ash instead of dumping it they’d save 250,000 tonnes of CO2 annually. So when they dump it at Radley that’s a lot of CO2 they could have saved. In fact if they sent their ash by rail to RWE HQ in Essen, where they know how to recycle, (instead of making excuses about why they can’t) then returned it by rail to sell as cement, bricks, tiles etc, there would be a huge saving in CO2 production. Even if they trucked it to Essen and back there’d still be a huge saving.

Of course if RWE npower wanted to save still more CO2, they’d buy a proper ash recycling plant – but that would dent their profits and dumping is so cheap.


Matt, London says...
10:13pm Mon 9 Apr 07

Yes, there are alternatives to dumping and npower know it.
http://www.ameren.com/AboutUs/ADC_Charah.asp

colin, Abingdon (Radley Road) says...
12:04pm Thu 12 Apr 07

Where does 'lorry loads' of ash come into it?. In the past they transported Ash using trains. A small 'branchline' led to older lakes (filled in with Powder Ash).

The new version is mixed into a sort of porridge/slop and pumped into the area using pipes/pumping stations. (don't know if that is from Didcot PS or a relay station within the grounds of Radley Lakes/"Pits".


Comments are closed on this article.

UK Debt Help and Advice | IVA help and advice | The truth about IVAs | Stay with Prague Hotels | Visit Spain with Barcelona Hotels

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »