Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email »
8:23am Thursday 15th March 2007
The Government survived a major Labour backbench revolt last night to secure the backing of the House of Commons for its plan to replace Britain's Trident nuclear deterrent.
The Government won the main motion by 409 votes to 161 - a majority of 248. Earlier, an amendment tabled by rebel Labour MPs to delay Trident renewal was defeated.
FOR THE MOTION: Oxon Tories David Cameron, Tony Baldry, Ed Vaizey and Boris Johnson
AGAINST THE MOTION: Andrew smith (Lab), Evan Harris (Lib Dem)
The rebels claimed more than 90 Labour MPs voted for delay, with others abstaining, making it the biggest revolt since the Iraq War.
One of the Labour rebels, Oxford East MP Andrew Smith, said he had "always loathed" nuclear weapons.
He said the estimated £20bn cost of the project would be better spent tackling climate change, improving schools and hospitals and ensuring conventional troops were better equipped.
With David Cameron's Tories voting for Trident replacement, the Government was never in danger of defeat.
However, the scale of the rebellion is another blow for the authority of Tony Blair as his premiership enters its final months.
Earlier in the day, two more ministerial aides - Stephen Pound, the parliamentary private secretary (PPS) to Labour Party chairman Hazel Blears, and Chris Ruane, the PPS to Northern Ireland Secretary Peter Hain - resigned in protest.
Mr Blair defended the decision to retain Trident and said it was essential a decision to begin work on the design of a new submarine fleet was taken now.
"I think that is essential for our security in an uncertain world," he told MPs at Prime Minister's Questions.
"We can't put this decision off. We have to take it now."
In an olive branch to opponents, Mr Blair said future Parliaments would be able to revisit the issue as the orders for the submarines would be placed in the next decade.
Witney MP Mr Cameron also emphasised his party's support for maintaining Trident.
"Replacing Britain's independent nuclear deterrent is in the national interest," he said.
"In a dangerous and uncertain world, unilateral nuclear disarmament has never been and will never be the right answer."
Evan Harris, Liberal Democrat MP for Oxford West, said a premature decision to renew Trident would be "wholly counter-productive" to the major global effort required to prevent nuclear proliferation and the possession of nuclear weapons by states like Iran.
M, Oxford says...
11:58am Thu 15 Mar 07
Neil, Oxford says...
5:15pm Thu 15 Mar 07
m, Oxford says...
11:53am Fri 16 Mar 07
samuel gorman, United States says...
7:36pm Thu 22 Mar 07
John wrote:The idea of the USA invading such a strong ally in fifteen years is ridiculous. Disagreements on US actions in the Middle East do not provide enough incentive to put these states in a situation from which a war could arise. Likewise, the position of the USA as a whole on even the current war against a state deemed "threatening" is less than favorable. As such, a war with the UK seems even more unlikely with the global community among democractic nations as interwoven as it is today, a relationship moer likely to increase or maintain rather than deteriorate completely. Even if the USA refuses to pursue alternate fuel sources, the aquisition of technology from more forward thinking nations is monumentally more feasible. Furthermore, although oil prices are constantly climbing, a relistic estimate for an oil shortage so severe as to cause a world-wide break-down of civilization as we know it is considerably further away than fifteen years.
Andrew needs to think about the threat of a military invasion of the UK from the USA in ten to fifteen years time, when oil will be in even shorter supply than it is now - so I agree with David Cameron on this one.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Make a date in Oxfordshire now!
Search Now »
Find homes for sale in Oxford, Headington, Abingdon & Banbury
Search Now »
Cars for sale in Oxfordshire
Search Now »
John, Oxford says...
10:20pm Wed 14 Mar 07