This is not quite the same as an actual park



First published in News

As part of the Northern Gateway consultation, Oxford City Council gave an option of using the city-wide standard of at least 10 per cent of the site area that is developed for housing as public open space.

The alternative was provision for a greater proportion of the residential site to be open space (eg 15 per cent). As you would expect, a clear majority of respondents selected the larger proportion to be open space. How wonderful to have a council that offers more public open space. But on further examination of the Area Action Plan (AAP) it becomes clear why the council did this – and it’s far from wonderful.

The council’s Green Spaces Strategy aspires to all residents being within 750m of a medium sized park. To achieve this on Northern Gateway a medium sized park would need to be included on the site. But the AAP does not include plans for a medium sized park and it uses the additional five per cent of public open space to justify this decision. There is mention of “features associated with medium parks” – not quite the same as an actual park.

Similarly Northern Gateway is supposed to provide alternative recreation provision for dog-walking within the AAP boundary. This is to protect Port Meadow from the effects of the additional residents and their dogs. But the AAP doesn’t do this either. And again the additional 5 per cent of public open space is used to justify this decision.

With a development on the scale of Northern Gateway surely our council can make room for proper public open space in the form of at least one park?

I have great faith in the independent Planning Inspector who will examine the AAP, and I hope that the city council will be called to account on this particular issue.

And just a reminder that the online consultation is open until September 15.

Suzanne McIvor

Talbot Road



  • Do you want alerts delivered straight to your phone via our WhatsApp service? Text NEWS or SPORT or NEWS AND SPORT, depending on which services you want, and your full name to 07767 417704. Save our number into your phone’s contacts as Oxford Mail WhatsApp and ensure you have WhatsApp installed.

Send your Letter to the Editor

11:20am Monday 28th July 2014

What do you think? We welcome letters from our readers on a wide variety of subjects and you can send us a letter through the blue headline above.

Today’s letters

Care from NHS has been just excellent

Oxford Mail: Nurse got me through some difficult times

10:00am Tuesday 25th November 2014

I guess that it is time for those who have benefited from the good work of the NHS to have their say. I have just endured a run of bad health that you only read about other people having.

We need alternatives rather than this idea

Oxford Mail: Nurse got me through some difficult times

10:00am Tuesday 25th November 2014

Local planners and local politicians leave me in despair. Their innovative ideas include bypassing the A34 bypass.

Why not dig a tunnel and go under Botley?

Oxford Mail: Nurse got me through some difficult times

10:00am Tuesday 25th November 2014

I read with interest Andy Ffrench’s front page article on unblocking the A34 (November 24).

A costly source of even more house building

Oxford Mail: Nurse got me through some difficult times

10:00am Tuesday 25th November 2014

Stephen Webb’s letter, ‘The council needs to reconsider its plans’, November 21, promoting the use of brownfield sites shows a wholly naïve misunderstanding of their use in relation to meeting the appalling housing targets being imposed upon the region as a result of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment.


Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree