‘Ugliest building’ in Oxford comes down

‘Ugliest building’ in Oxford comes down

Pro-vice-chancellor Prof William James, left, hands a demolition hammer to former department librarian Brian Taylor as demolition of the Hans Krebs Tower starts

The Hans Krebs Tower

First published in News Oxford Mail: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter covering North Oxford, Jericho and Summertown. Call me on 01865 425498

PEOPLE working there joked that it offered the best views of Oxford – because they were in the only place it could not be seen.

So there were few tears when the demolition of Oxford University’s Hans Krebs Tower started on Monday.

After being the home of the biochemistry department for some 50 years, the seven-storey building is due to make way for a replacement.

But although widely thought an eyesore on the city skyline, pro-vice-chancellor Professor William James said it had played host to some significant scientific discoveries.

He said: “I worked there in the 1980s, like lots of people in the department, and some good science was done there.

“Key work experiments were done there by Sir Paul Nurse as part of his research into cancer genes and cell replication.

“And Edwin Southern, who I think should have won a Nobel Prize, also developed his DNA micro-array technology [which allows scientists to examine genes] in the tower.”

But the building also possessed another rare feature, he said.

“It used a paternoster lift, because the building was very narrow but lots of people needed to get up and down the seven floors.”

Paternoster lifts are a set of lift cubicles which rotate on a pulley system up and down the building. For a seven-floor tower, 14 lifts are used, all constantly moving.

“You could get around very quickly,” Prof James said, “but when it was decided, in about 1990 I think, that they were not safe, they replaced it with an ordinary lift system. You could get about two people in each paternoster lift. It was a bit alarming on first try because you are just jumping into this small moving box.

“Postgraduates and second years used to have great fun when students first came there, by telling them that the boxes were fixed in position and went upside down as they went round the top.

“They would get in one going up on the seventh floor then do a handstand inside so that when it came back down through the seventh floor it looked like they’d been flipped round.”

The department left the tower in 2008 and moved to other laboratories. The new facility to be built on the site will house researchers of physiology, chemistry, biochemistry and clinical neurosciences in new facilities.

Prof James added: “We are pleased that we can replace it with a modern, state-of-the-art building which will allow experts in the biosciences in Oxford to carry out new and exciting research.”

Demolition is expected to continue until November.

  • Do you want alerts delivered straight to your phone via our WhatsApp service? Text NEWS or SPORT or NEWS AND SPORT, depending on which services you want, and your full name to 07767 417704. Save our number into your phone's contacts as Oxford Mail WhatsApp and ensure you have WhatsApp installed.

Send your Letter to the Editor: What do you think? We welcome letters from our readers on a wide variety of subjects and you can send us a letter for publication here

11:20am Monday 28th July 2014

What do you think? We welcome letters from our readers on a wide variety of subjects and you can send us a letter through the blue headline above.


Our top stories

Festival voice: Tom Jones to top bill at Cornbury

Oxford Mail:

12:10am Thursday 5th March 2015

CROONER Sir Tom Jones has been named as the big name headliner for this summer's Cornbury Festival.

Pedestrian seriously injured after collision with car used in petrol theft at Heyford Hill

Oxford Mail: Thames Valley Police logo

2:38pm Wednesday 4th March 2015

A pedestrian was left with "serious injuries" after being involved in a collision with a thief's car, police said.

MP calls for a public inquiry into failures to protect girls

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Wednesday 4th March 2015

CALLS for an independent inquiry into the Bullfinch child abuse scandal and police and social services’ failings were growing last night.

Evidence of gang's organised abuse was ignored for years

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Wednesday 4th March 2015

CHILD protection authorities feared an organised gang of paedophiles was prostituting vulnerable girls four years before Operation Bullfinch was launched – but nothing was done.

This was an honest review, says Hudspeth

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Wednesday 4th March 2015

THE leader of Oxfordshire County Council said “everyone was open and honest” about the failings exposed by the Serious Case Review.

Campaigner calling for heads to roll

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Wednesday 4th March 2015

A CHILD safety campaigner last night accused Joanna Simons and Sara Thornton of lacking integrity for refusing to take personal responsibility for Oxfordshire County Council and Thames Valley Police’s failings.

 

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:28am Fri 22 Aug 14

Myron Blatz says...

So, one down and so many other ugly buildings to GO! Personally, I'd also demolish all those terrible home extensions whoch blight entire streets - usually roof conversions which are totally unsympathetic to he area, but usually add income value to HMO semi-detached homes. It's almost as though City Council Planning doesn't care so much about esthetics, as the additional council tax which may result - and private landlords and those wretched 'housing associations' don't cost City Council money to repair, maintain and be responsible for housing it doesn't own! Notice the article didn't illustrate what was going to replace the old building - which set a planning precedent on the site, so could end up being just another seven-storey eyesore in Oxford!
So, one down and so many other ugly buildings to GO! Personally, I'd also demolish all those terrible home extensions whoch blight entire streets - usually roof conversions which are totally unsympathetic to he area, but usually add income value to HMO semi-detached homes. It's almost as though City Council Planning doesn't care so much about esthetics, as the additional council tax which may result - and private landlords and those wretched 'housing associations' don't cost City Council money to repair, maintain and be responsible for housing it doesn't own! Notice the article didn't illustrate what was going to replace the old building - which set a planning precedent on the site, so could end up being just another seven-storey eyesore in Oxford! Myron Blatz
  • Score: -9

10:48am Fri 22 Aug 14

xenarthra says...

Myron Blatz wrote:
So, one down and so many other ugly buildings to GO! Personally, I'd also demolish all those terrible home extensions whoch blight entire streets - usually roof conversions which are totally unsympathetic to he area, but usually add income value to HMO semi-detached homes. It's almost as though City Council Planning doesn't care so much about esthetics, as the additional council tax which may result - and private landlords and those wretched 'housing associations' don't cost City Council money to repair, maintain and be responsible for housing it doesn't own! Notice the article didn't illustrate what was going to replace the old building - which set a planning precedent on the site, so could end up being just another seven-storey eyesore in Oxford!
Most loft conversions are built under permitted development rights, so their aesthetics are not under the control of the City Council's Planning Department.
[quote][p][bold]Myron Blatz[/bold] wrote: So, one down and so many other ugly buildings to GO! Personally, I'd also demolish all those terrible home extensions whoch blight entire streets - usually roof conversions which are totally unsympathetic to he area, but usually add income value to HMO semi-detached homes. It's almost as though City Council Planning doesn't care so much about esthetics, as the additional council tax which may result - and private landlords and those wretched 'housing associations' don't cost City Council money to repair, maintain and be responsible for housing it doesn't own! Notice the article didn't illustrate what was going to replace the old building - which set a planning precedent on the site, so could end up being just another seven-storey eyesore in Oxford![/p][/quote]Most loft conversions are built under permitted development rights, so their aesthetics are not under the control of the City Council's Planning Department. xenarthra
  • Score: 8

12:26pm Fri 22 Aug 14

Discerning1 says...

I thought the Theoretical Physics building on Banbury Road/Keble Road corner was the ugliest building...
I thought the Theoretical Physics building on Banbury Road/Keble Road corner was the ugliest building... Discerning1
  • Score: 6

1:52pm Fri 22 Aug 14

Paul0 says...

This article doesn't say where the building IS. I assume it's in or near Parks Road -- but why not just tell us?
This article doesn't say where the building IS. I assume it's in or near Parks Road -- but why not just tell us? Paul0
  • Score: 1

5:40pm Fri 22 Aug 14

Captain J says...

Hans Krebs tower is on Hinshelwood Road which is a turning halfway down Parks Road
Hans Krebs tower is on Hinshelwood Road which is a turning halfway down Parks Road Captain J
  • Score: 0

2:29pm Sat 23 Aug 14

Isawyoucoming says...

Captain J wrote:
Hans Krebs tower is on Hinshelwood Road which is a turning halfway down Parks Road
South Parks Rd.
[quote][p][bold]Captain J[/bold] wrote: Hans Krebs tower is on Hinshelwood Road which is a turning halfway down Parks Road[/p][/quote]South Parks Rd. Isawyoucoming
  • Score: -2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree