Grumbles over rumbles from demolition job

Grumbles over rumbles from demolition job

Grumbles over rumbles from demolition job

First published in News
Last updated

NOISE and rumblings from the redevelopment of an Oxford college are “far beyond what is tolerable”, residents have said.

They have reported vibrations in their homes from the demolition of the south and west sides of Ruskin College, in Walton Street.

The plan – for 90 new study rooms for Exeter College students in a quadrangle – was approved by Oxford City Council in April.

Worcester Place resident Christopher Johnson said work was “in excessive levels of noise and vibration far beyond what is tolerable in a narrow residential street”.

Walton Street’s Carole Moore described the situation as “unbelievably wretched”. The academic said the situation made it difficult to work from home during the day.

Construction firm Mace said it had not expected to find deep-piled foundations under the brick-built 1980s block.

A spokesman said: “Any major demolition and construction project will require the use of heavy equipment and Walton Street is no exception.”

The first phase of demolition has been completed but a more intensive phase is expected to continue until the end of this autumn.

The firm added that equipment had been carefully selected and damping measures such as screening and noise monitoring were being carried out.

A city council spokesman said: “Officers last week looked into complaints from several residents about noise and vibration from the site.

“We were advised that the contractors were investigating alternative measures to remove (parts of) the foundations to reduce the impact of this activity.”

  • Do you want alerts delivered straight to your phone via our WhatsApp service? Text NEWS or SPORT or NEWS AND SPORT, depending on which services you want, and your full name to 07767 417704. Save our number into your phone's contacts as Oxford Mail WhatsApp and ensure you have WhatsApp installed.

    Send your Letter to the Editor

    11:20am Monday 28th July 2014

    What do you think? We welcome letters from our readers on a wide variety of subjects and you can send us a letter through the blue headline above.

Our top stories

Pothole payouts in Oxfordshire double

Oxford Mail:

9:00am Wednesday 28th January 2015

THE amount of compensation claimed by Oxfordshire drivers for pothole damage more than doubled in two years.

Last Didcot Power Station towers to be demolished next year

Oxford Mail:

12:00pm Wednesday 28th January 2015

THE three remaining cooling towers at the former Didcot A power station will be demolished in 2016, according to energy company RWE npower.

Man left with cut across face after being attacked in Banbury

Oxford Mail: Thames Valley Police logo

11:51am Wednesday 28th January 2015

A MAN is in hospital after he was cut across the face by a stranger, police said.

Great grandfather travels in style right until the end

Oxford Mail:

8:30am Wednesday 28th January 2015

A HORSE and carriage funeral procession made its way through the streets of Oxford yesterday as a great grandfather made his final journey.

Senior councillors back plan to debate new 'super council'

Oxford Mail: New Oxfordshire county council logo

7:10am Wednesday 28th January 2015

SENIOR councillors of Oxfordshire’s biggest authority have supported calls for a debate on creating one ‘super authority’ for the county.

Oxfordshire ambulance services accused of "playing god" and "putting lives at risk" in new drug trial

Oxford Mail:

9:00am Tuesday 27th January 2015

CARDIAC arrest patients could be given a salt solution instead of adrenaline as part of a new medical trial in Oxfordshire.

Comments

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree