Confusing tale of two signs calls for a speedy solution

Newsagent Kulwant Singh in front of the signs in Whitehouse Road

Newsagent Kulwant Singh in front of the signs in Whitehouse Road

First published in News

DRIVERS should be paying attention to the roads when watching their speed limit.

They certainly don’t need distractions like these signs spotted yesterday at the junction of Whitehouse and Abingdon roads, Oxford.

It appeared one of two speed limit signs had been flipped – leading motorists confused as to whether the limit was 20mph or 30mph.

Kulwant Singh, owner of nearby newsagent The Local Top Up Store, said: “Customers have been coming into the shop to ask me what is going on. It is really very stupid. I hope the council is not responsible for this. We pay them all this money and they can’t even put signs up properly.”

Oxfordshire County Council spokesman Martin Crabtree said the authority would report the incident but that it was a road maintained by Oxford City Council.

City council spokeswoman Chris Lee said: “We will investigate the signage issue and rectify the matter today.”

Top News
Do you want alerts delivered straight to your phone via our WhatsApp service? Text NEWS or SPORT or NEWS AND SPORT, depending on which services you want, and your full name to 07767 417704. Save our number into your phone's contacts as Oxford Mail WhatsApp and ensure you have WhatsApp installed.

Send your Letter to the Editor

11:20am Monday 28th July 2014

What do you think? We welcome letters from our readers on a wide variety of subjects and you can send us a letter through the blue headline above.


Our top stories

Funnyman Fry serves up a bit of self-awareness

Oxford Mail:

9:30am Friday 31st October 2014

NATIONAL treasure Stephen Fry met fans in the Bodleian Library for a “hackathon”.

‘Lonely hearts club scam cost me £631’

Oxford Mail:

8:40am Friday 31st October 2014

A MAN left with a £631 phone bill after a relationship with a woman he met on a dating website is warning others to be wary.

Urban dancers prove they can move to the groove

Oxford Mail:

8:30am Friday 31st October 2014

DANCE group Body Politic took Oxford’s Pegasus Theatre by storm as it rolled into town as part of its UK tour.

Mum of drugs death teenager in plea to MPs for law review

Oxford Mail:

8:30am Friday 31st October 2014

A MOTHER who lost her 15-year-old daughter after she took Ecstasy urged MPs to review drug laws yesterday.

£10m community cash for West Way upgrade

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Friday 31st October 2014

DEVELOPERS behind the planned Botley regeneration have revealed they will fund £10m towards community benefits if the controversial scheme goes ahead.

Height row flats' tree screening plan blasted

Oxford Mail:

7:00am Friday 31st October 2014

UNIVERSITY bosses have put forward plans to screen a student flats development by Port Meadow with trees but ruled out reducing its height.

Comments (12)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:45am Thu 31 Jul 14

London_Ox says...

"It is really very stupid. I hope the council is not responsible for this"

Of course it's the Council, who else would it be?! Would somebody produce and put up such signs at their own expense and off their own back..

Now that would be really very stupid.. lol
"It is really very stupid. I hope the council is not responsible for this" Of course it's the Council, who else would it be?! Would somebody produce and put up such signs at their own expense and off their own back.. Now that would be really very stupid.. lol London_Ox
  • Score: -6

9:13am Thu 31 Jul 14

Localad says...

London_Ox wrote:
"It is really very stupid. I hope the council is not responsible for this"

Of course it's the Council, who else would it be?! Would somebody produce and put up such signs at their own expense and off their own back..

Now that would be really very stupid.. lol
Or, as the article suggests, someone has turned one sign through 180 degrees, one can hardly blame the Council for that
[quote][p][bold]London_Ox[/bold] wrote: "It is really very stupid. I hope the council is not responsible for this" Of course it's the Council, who else would it be?! Would somebody produce and put up such signs at their own expense and off their own back.. Now that would be really very stupid.. lol[/p][/quote]Or, as the article suggests, someone has turned one sign through 180 degrees, one can hardly blame the Council for that Localad
  • Score: 14

10:14am Thu 31 Jul 14

HomerSimpsonDoh says...

They should have made sure the signs could not be turned round, so yes the councils fault.
They should have made sure the signs could not be turned round, so yes the councils fault. HomerSimpsonDoh
  • Score: -11

10:36am Thu 31 Jul 14

Neonlights says...

HomerSimpsonDoh wrote:
They should have made sure the signs could not be turned round, so yes the councils fault.
If the 20 mph limit was returned to a 30 mph limit then it wouldn't matter which was around it was turned.
[quote][p][bold]HomerSimpsonDoh[/bold] wrote: They should have made sure the signs could not be turned round, so yes the councils fault.[/p][/quote]If the 20 mph limit was returned to a 30 mph limit then it wouldn't matter which was around it was turned. Neonlights
  • Score: -4

11:32am Thu 31 Jul 14

BigAlBiker says...

20mph is a joke, modern vehicles are well equipped to be safe at these speeds, 30mph is normal for our roads.
20mph is a joke, modern vehicles are well equipped to be safe at these speeds, 30mph is normal for our roads. BigAlBiker
  • Score: -2

11:52am Thu 31 Jul 14

WestQuarterJ says...

I'm open to being told I'm wrong, but isn't it pretty obvious that the 30 limit is for the big main road running in and out of Oxford, and the 20 limit is for the little residential side road? I'm not clear how you would get up to 30 on Whitehouse Road anyway.
I'm open to being told I'm wrong, but isn't it pretty obvious that the 30 limit is for the big main road running in and out of Oxford, and the 20 limit is for the little residential side road? I'm not clear how you would get up to 30 on Whitehouse Road anyway. WestQuarterJ
  • Score: 3

11:53am Thu 31 Jul 14

WestQuarterJ says...

HomerSimpsonDoh wrote:
They should have made sure the signs could not be turned round, so yes the councils fault.
Calling Harry Potter... we need an immovable object.
[quote][p][bold]HomerSimpsonDoh[/bold] wrote: They should have made sure the signs could not be turned round, so yes the councils fault.[/p][/quote]Calling Harry Potter... we need an immovable object. WestQuarterJ
  • Score: 3

12:20pm Thu 31 Jul 14

King Joke says...

WestQuarterJ wrote:
HomerSimpsonDoh wrote:
They should have made sure the signs could not be turned round, so yes the councils fault.
Calling Harry Potter... we need an immovable object.
Where there's a will there's a way. IF someone really wants to move, alter or deface a sign they will do it. By your logic Homer, grafitti us the council's fault too.
[quote][p][bold]WestQuarterJ[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]HomerSimpsonDoh[/bold] wrote: They should have made sure the signs could not be turned round, so yes the councils fault.[/p][/quote]Calling Harry Potter... we need an immovable object.[/p][/quote]Where there's a will there's a way. IF someone really wants to move, alter or deface a sign they will do it. By your logic Homer, grafitti us the council's fault too. King Joke
  • Score: 3

1:08pm Thu 31 Jul 14

Floflo says...

BigAlBiker wrote:
20mph is a joke, modern vehicles are well equipped to be safe at these speeds, 30mph is normal for our roads.
Vehicles are well equipped to be safe and I do feel very safe when I drive around town. Hit a pedestrian at 20 or 30 you are likely to come away without any bruises. However you need to think of people you share our streets with.

However if a human is hit at a car travelling 20 mph they have an 80% chance of survival. If you are hit by a car travelling at 30 mph you are most likely to be killed.
[quote][p][bold]BigAlBiker[/bold] wrote: 20mph is a joke, modern vehicles are well equipped to be safe at these speeds, 30mph is normal for our roads.[/p][/quote]Vehicles are well equipped to be safe and I do feel very safe when I drive around town. Hit a pedestrian at 20 or 30 you are likely to come away without any bruises. However you need to think of people you share our streets with. However if a human is hit at a car travelling 20 mph they have an 80% chance of survival. If you are hit by a car travelling at 30 mph you are most likely to be killed. Floflo
  • Score: -5

5:14pm Thu 31 Jul 14

TommyC says...

There is now such an overcomplication of speed limits that it's sometimes difficult to know what the speed limit is.

We used to have a perfectly sensible system. 30 mph in residential areas and city centres, 40 mph in semi-urban areas, and national speed limit (60 mph for single carriageways and 70 mph for dual carriageways and motorways) everywhere else. Now as well as the 20 mph limits there's a plague of 50 mph limits on wide A roads. The speed limit can change several times within the space of half a mile or less.
There is now such an overcomplication of speed limits that it's sometimes difficult to know what the speed limit is. We used to have a perfectly sensible system. 30 mph in residential areas and city centres, 40 mph in semi-urban areas, and national speed limit (60 mph for single carriageways and 70 mph for dual carriageways and motorways) everywhere else. Now as well as the 20 mph limits there's a plague of 50 mph limits on wide A roads. The speed limit can change several times within the space of half a mile or less. TommyC
  • Score: 6

1:06am Fri 1 Aug 14

T Chandler says...

Why do we need two signs anyway? You only need one it's just a waste of money.
Why do we need two signs anyway? You only need one it's just a waste of money. T Chandler
  • Score: 0

10:11am Fri 1 Aug 14

WestQuarterJ says...

T Chandler wrote:
Why do we need two signs anyway? You only need one it's just a waste of money.
When the speed limit changes, you need one on each side of the road so people can see the change whichever direction they're coming from...
[quote][p][bold]T Chandler[/bold] wrote: Why do we need two signs anyway? You only need one it's just a waste of money.[/p][/quote]When the speed limit changes, you need one on each side of the road so people can see the change whichever direction they're coming from... WestQuarterJ
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree