To spend or not to spend is the question for councils

Oxford Mail: To spend or not to spend  is the question for councils To spend or not to spend is the question for councils

TAXPAYERS’ money of course has to be spent very wisely. And authorities should be doing all they can to ensure it goes a long way.

That’s why it’s right for Councillor Bob Johnston to be warning that an opportunity to save millions on the much-needed £123m Western Conveyance channel could be missed.

Network Rail has been asked to pay for a culvert to go under the line in South Oxford at the same time it is raising the tracks for its electrification scheme.

Discussions are still ongoing but it doesn’t sound like there is much hope and that Environment Agency and councils may have to stump up the cash.

On the other end of the scale is the city council’s apparent lack of spending money.

As our story today reveals, not much more than £15,000 has been spent two years after the city council announced its cycle scheme.

Rather than them not wanting to spend it, it sounds like it’s a case of the city and county councils not joining up properly. The city had some of the cash. The county is the highways authority and so would need to approve most of the schemes.

But how difficult can it be?

The money is there and with thousands of cyclists travelling through the city every day it should be spent sooner rather than later to make the roads safer. Let’s hope Councillor John Tanner sticks to his word and makes sure more is done to get the ball rolling.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:14am Mon 14 Jul 14

Oxonian says...

For some reason, we are not allowed to comment on the original story about "cycling improvements", so I'll add my two-pennyworth here.

They are called cycling improvements, but a cycle lane in Little Clarendon Street was never a good idea, as it allows cyclists to ride in the wrong direction on a narrow one-way street, against the flow of other traffic.

And the "improvements" at the Plain roundabout have been questioned by cyclists as not being improvements, and i agree with their reservations.

Once again, our traffic "planners" are making a mess of things.
For some reason, we are not allowed to comment on the original story about "cycling improvements", so I'll add my two-pennyworth here. They are called cycling improvements, but a cycle lane in Little Clarendon Street was never a good idea, as it allows cyclists to ride in the wrong direction on a narrow one-way street, against the flow of other traffic. And the "improvements" at the Plain roundabout have been questioned by cyclists as not being improvements, and i agree with their reservations. Once again, our traffic "planners" are making a mess of things. Oxonian
  • Score: 0
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree