Should firefighters strike again in their dispute over pensions?

Firefighters from Rewley Road on strike in May

Firefighters from Rewley Road on strike in May

First published in News

To begin with we have a legal right to go on strike, the same as anyone else. We are employees and just because we’re doing a particular job doesn’t preclude us from taking industrial action, writes Steve Allen.

The Fire Brigades Union has been negotiating nationally for three years and has never walked away from the negotiating table.

We’re always willing to talk and find a compromise.

We have supplied various solutions for the Government to consider all the way through this dispute.

 

Oxford Mail:

Our arguments are based on facts supported by evidence, none of which has been counted by the Government.

The pension scheme they devised in 2012 is not fit for purpose.

It doesn’t take into account the occupational demands and stresses put on individuals throughout their working life, such as the accumulative demands the role of a firefighter has on fitness.

As you get older it’s harder to maintain your fitness.

The Government’s own report that it commissioned showed that 66 per cent of firefighters wouldn’t be able to maintain their fitness past the age of 55, and this would drop to eight or nine per cent by the age of 60.

This has two results – it puts fire crews and the public at risk by potentially sending unfit firefighters into dangerous situations to rescue people.

Also, if the fire service decides that it can’t work with these people it can sack them for being incapable.

If this happens, they have no real access to their pension scheme until state pension age.

This is the real reason why we’re taking industrial action. The Government has refused to listen to its own report that it has commissioned, which shows that there’s a real risk of firefighters losing their job when they get past the age of 55.

The Fire Brigades Union does not want to go on strike and deprive the public from fire cover, but what can we do as a union representing the vast majority of firefighters in the country.

 

The public sector will spend £95 billion it doesn’t have this year, equivalent to £1,500 each or around £6,000 for a family of four, writes Rory Meakin.

We’re in no mood for the taxman to empty our pockets even more aggressively, so that means that savings must be found in areas of unnecessary spending to balance the books. One such area is the overly generous pension schemes offered to public sector staff.

The Fire Brigades Union chiefs have called this a “vicious” attack on their members’ financial circumstances, but in fact the proposals do not go far enough.

There is a reason why, despite the complaints, fire brigade staff will carry on paying in the “unacceptable” employee contributions to participate in the scheme – rather than opting out and setting up a private pension instead.

 

Oxford Mail:

It’s because they are extraordinarily generous. Slightly less generous than before, yes. But nonetheless still very generous indeed. For example, a firefighter who earns £29,000 a year will be able to retire at 60 on £19,000 which will be topped up to £26,000 when eligible for the state pension.

Crucially, the pension benefits are uprated with average earnings, which tend to rise faster than prices.

This detail is part of what makes this scheme so valuable to members – and so costly for taxpayers.

Increased longevity and the falling value of annuities, together with less favourable tax treatment, have meant that salary-related pension schemes are no longer available to most workers in the private sector.

The higher costs just aren’t worth it for most of us. So it’s pretty galling to hear about those in the public sector angry that theirs aren’t as generous as they’d like. And the cost of that generosity is by no means small. While firefighters contribute around £100 million from their salaries to their pension scheme, taxpayers are currently forking out over £500 million. That’s unsustainable.

Ultimately, this dispute comes down to cash. The unions want more of it for their members than taxpayers can afford, and the Government is living beyond our means.

Everyone is grateful for the work that fire crews do. They risk their lives to rescue others and make sure we understand how best to protect ourselves from danger.

But the Fire Brigades Union strike is unfair, unsustainable and unrealistic.

They should know a good deal when they see it and call off the strike. Financial realities mean that our children and grandchildren will have higher taxes to pay off debts we rack up today.

  • Our top stories

UPDATE: Man left with serious head injuries after being hit with wooden item during fight in Bicester

Oxford Mail: Thames Valley Police logo

3:17pm Saturday 31st January 2015

THREE men have been arrested after a man was left with "serious injuries," police say.

Landslip near Banbury shuts line to Leamington Spa causing major delays

Oxford Mail: A Chiltern Railways Clubman train

10:29am Sunday 1st February 2015

TRAINS from Oxford to the north of England will be disrupted until at least Tuesday after a landslip on Saturday.

Snow across Oxfordshire - in readers' pictures + forecast

Oxford Mail:

7:43am Saturday 31st January 2015

IT'S been snowing overnight in Oxfordshire and here's some of the pictures our readers have sent in.

Record broken as more than £500,000 raised for Poppy Appeal

Oxford Mail:

9:00am Saturday 31st January 2015

THE POPPY Appeal’s fundraising target has been smashed in the county.

Healthcare worker brought back from Africa to UK for Ebola monitoring via Brize Norton

Oxford Mail: RAF logo

1:20pm Saturday 31st January 2015

A British military healthcare worker has been brought back to England for Ebola monitoring after suffering a needle-stick injury while treating a person in Sierra Leone.

Oxford United striker Danny Hylton says they are ready for Stevenage battle

Oxford Mail:

9:30am Saturday 31st January 2015

Danny Hylton has warned Oxford United will get “eaten alive” at Stevenage today unless they match their hosts’ appetite for a battle.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:27am Wed 9 Jul 14

Quentin Walker says...

I am a great supporter and admirer of the firemen, however, if what Mr Meakin says is true (a firefighter who earns £29,000 a year will be able to retire at 60 on £19,000 which will be topped up to £26,000 when eligible for the state pension), then I think that is a reasonable deal.

I would be interested in hearing the counter argument from the FBU.
I am a great supporter and admirer of the firemen, however, if what Mr Meakin says is true (a firefighter who earns £29,000 a year will be able to retire at 60 on £19,000 which will be topped up to £26,000 when eligible for the state pension), then I think that is a reasonable deal. I would be interested in hearing the counter argument from the FBU. Quentin Walker
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree