Should firefighters strike again in their dispute over pensions?

Firefighters from Rewley Road on strike in May

Firefighters from Rewley Road on strike in May

First published in

To begin with we have a legal right to go on strike, the same as anyone else. We are employees and just because we’re doing a particular job doesn’t preclude us from taking industrial action, writes Steve Allen.

The Fire Brigades Union has been negotiating nationally for three years and has never walked away from the negotiating table.

We’re always willing to talk and find a compromise.

We have supplied various solutions for the Government to consider all the way through this dispute.

 

Oxford Mail:

Our arguments are based on facts supported by evidence, none of which has been counted by the Government.

The pension scheme they devised in 2012 is not fit for purpose.

It doesn’t take into account the occupational demands and stresses put on individuals throughout their working life, such as the accumulative demands the role of a firefighter has on fitness.

As you get older it’s harder to maintain your fitness.

The Government’s own report that it commissioned showed that 66 per cent of firefighters wouldn’t be able to maintain their fitness past the age of 55, and this would drop to eight or nine per cent by the age of 60.

This has two results – it puts fire crews and the public at risk by potentially sending unfit firefighters into dangerous situations to rescue people.

Also, if the fire service decides that it can’t work with these people it can sack them for being incapable.

If this happens, they have no real access to their pension scheme until state pension age.

This is the real reason why we’re taking industrial action. The Government has refused to listen to its own report that it has commissioned, which shows that there’s a real risk of firefighters losing their job when they get past the age of 55.

The Fire Brigades Union does not want to go on strike and deprive the public from fire cover, but what can we do as a union representing the vast majority of firefighters in the country.

 

The public sector will spend £95 billion it doesn’t have this year, equivalent to £1,500 each or around £6,000 for a family of four, writes Rory Meakin.

We’re in no mood for the taxman to empty our pockets even more aggressively, so that means that savings must be found in areas of unnecessary spending to balance the books. One such area is the overly generous pension schemes offered to public sector staff.

The Fire Brigades Union chiefs have called this a “vicious” attack on their members’ financial circumstances, but in fact the proposals do not go far enough.

There is a reason why, despite the complaints, fire brigade staff will carry on paying in the “unacceptable” employee contributions to participate in the scheme – rather than opting out and setting up a private pension instead.

 

Oxford Mail:

It’s because they are extraordinarily generous. Slightly less generous than before, yes. But nonetheless still very generous indeed. For example, a firefighter who earns £29,000 a year will be able to retire at 60 on £19,000 which will be topped up to £26,000 when eligible for the state pension.

Crucially, the pension benefits are uprated with average earnings, which tend to rise faster than prices.

This detail is part of what makes this scheme so valuable to members – and so costly for taxpayers.

Increased longevity and the falling value of annuities, together with less favourable tax treatment, have meant that salary-related pension schemes are no longer available to most workers in the private sector.

The higher costs just aren’t worth it for most of us. So it’s pretty galling to hear about those in the public sector angry that theirs aren’t as generous as they’d like. And the cost of that generosity is by no means small. While firefighters contribute around £100 million from their salaries to their pension scheme, taxpayers are currently forking out over £500 million. That’s unsustainable.

Ultimately, this dispute comes down to cash. The unions want more of it for their members than taxpayers can afford, and the Government is living beyond our means.

Everyone is grateful for the work that fire crews do. They risk their lives to rescue others and make sure we understand how best to protect ourselves from danger.

But the Fire Brigades Union strike is unfair, unsustainable and unrealistic.

They should know a good deal when they see it and call off the strike. Financial realities mean that our children and grandchildren will have higher taxes to pay off debts we rack up today.

  • Our top stories

Price calls for a radical rethink after a huge hike in payments to councillors

Oxford Mail:

6:00am Tuesday 2nd June 2015

ALLOWANCES for councillors should be overhauled to attract more people into politics, the leader of Oxford City Council has said.

Salter Steamer’s make a grand return to Abingdon Island

Oxford Mail:

6:00am Tuesday 2nd June 2015

OXFORD’S famous Salter’s Steamers have returned to Abingdon and opened their first permanent base in the town since 1989.

‘Create an A40 bus lane now, then bring in the tram trains’

Oxford Mail:

5:00pm Monday 1st June 2015

TRAM-TRAINS that can run on rail and roads could be a long-term solution to the Oxford to Witney transport link, campaigners have claimed.

Fight to stop Narnia author’s former pub turning into flats

Oxford Mail:

5:00pm Monday 1st June 2015

A PUB that used to be CS Lewis’ local has closed after more than 75 years.

Monty is named snappiest dresser at dog show

Oxford Mail:

5:00pm Monday 1st June 2015

OXFORD’S favourite dog show with a difference was back in town as part of the city’s Pride festival.

Oxfordshire to be hit by 50mph winds as Met Office issues severe weather warning

Oxford Mail: Wild winds headed towards Cornwall

11:05am Monday 1st June 2015

WINDS of up to 50mph could hit the county this afternoon.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:27am Wed 9 Jul 14

Quentin Walker says...

I am a great supporter and admirer of the firemen, however, if what Mr Meakin says is true (a firefighter who earns £29,000 a year will be able to retire at 60 on £19,000 which will be topped up to £26,000 when eligible for the state pension), then I think that is a reasonable deal.

I would be interested in hearing the counter argument from the FBU.
I am a great supporter and admirer of the firemen, however, if what Mr Meakin says is true (a firefighter who earns £29,000 a year will be able to retire at 60 on £19,000 which will be topped up to £26,000 when eligible for the state pension), then I think that is a reasonable deal. I would be interested in hearing the counter argument from the FBU. Quentin Walker
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree