Opposition to a congestion ‘tax’

Opposition to a congestion ‘tax’

Opposition to a congestion ‘tax’

First published in News

SUGGESTIONS that a congestion charge should be considered for the city have been criticised by senior figures in Oxford City Council.

Oxfordshire County Council has said it could not rule out the measure as a way to fund large new transport schemes proposed in a consultation document on the Local Transport Plan.

But city council leader Bob Price called it “regressive taxation” that would be opposed by Town Hall.

He said: “There would be a negative impact on shopping and companies based in the city. A more effective way of controlling congestion is to make public transport services better and encourage people to cycle or walk.”

John Tanner, Oxford City Council executive board member for Cleaner Greener Oxford and transport, said the measure would price those on lower incomes out of the city.

He said: “A better solution would be, like Nottingham, to charge all employers who have more than 10 parking spaces about £1 a day. That would encourage them not to waste space on parking.”

The Local Transport Plan stage one consultation started on June 20 and will finish on August 1. Visit consultations.oxfordshire.gov.uk/consult.ti/LTP4

Our top stories:

Jayden trial: Jake Blakeley tells jury his killer brother was evil

Oxford Mail: Jake Blakeley, 18, from Didcot

8:00am Saturday 24th January 2015

A TEENAGER accused of helping his brother bury the body of Jayden Parkinson wept in the dock as he was told to look at photos of the two graves.

'I'm glad my evil ex has been jailed for injuring me'

Oxford Mail:

9:00am Saturday 24th January 2015

A WOMAN left with life-changing injuries after her violent boyfriend pulled her car’s handbrake on the A40 said she is glad the “evil” man has been jailed.

Johnny Mullins backing Oxford United's quality

Oxford Mail: Johnny Mullins

9:00am Saturday 24th January 2015

Johnny Mullins says Oxford United’s squad have the quality to get themselves out of trouble even without help from new signings.

Haggis and a wee dram on menu for Burns Night

Oxford Mail:

8:30am Saturday 24th January 2015

FAMILIES and friends across Oxford are coming together to celebrate Sunday’s Burns Night in style.

Delight at decision to replace whole water pipe in Normandy Crescent

Oxford Mail:

8:30am Saturday 24th January 2015

RESIDENTS have welcomed Thames Water’s decision to replace the water pipe running through a flood-blighted street as “a step in the right direction.”

A34 northbound re-opened after lorry crash

Oxford Mail:

8:28am Saturday 24th January 2015

THE A34 northbound between Marcham and Milton re-opened this evening after the road was closed when a lorry crashed into a ditch last night.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:50am Thu 3 Jul 14

Quentin Walker says...

Hopefully, OCC will not realise how much cash can be made by dealing drugs...
Hopefully, OCC will not realise how much cash can be made by dealing drugs... Quentin Walker
  • Score: 0

11:48am Thu 3 Jul 14

Gunslinger says...

"OCC has said it could not rule out the measure as a way to fund large new transport schemes proposed in a consultation document on the Local Transport Plan"

So once again, like parking penalties, authorities are looking at these measures primarily as a revenue source rather than looking at what the actual impact might be.

Authorities cannot be trusted with additional income from fines and fees not to use it to paper over shortfalls in general budgets they should be spending on anyway.

In my opinion this should only be considered in relation to a specific major project (eg light rail scheme), and then only after a referendum - as happened in Manchester a few years ago.
"OCC has said it could not rule out the measure as a way to fund large new transport schemes proposed in a consultation document on the Local Transport Plan" So once again, like parking penalties, authorities are looking at these measures primarily as a revenue source rather than looking at what the actual impact might be. Authorities cannot be trusted with additional income from fines and fees not to use it to paper over shortfalls in general budgets they should be spending on anyway. In my opinion this should only be considered in relation to a specific major project (eg light rail scheme), and then only after a referendum - as happened in Manchester a few years ago. Gunslinger
  • Score: 4

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree