Opposition to a congestion ‘tax’

Opposition to a congestion ‘tax’

Opposition to a congestion ‘tax’

First published in News

SUGGESTIONS that a congestion charge should be considered for the city have been criticised by senior figures in Oxford City Council.

Oxfordshire County Council has said it could not rule out the measure as a way to fund large new transport schemes proposed in a consultation document on the Local Transport Plan.

But city council leader Bob Price called it “regressive taxation” that would be opposed by Town Hall.

He said: “There would be a negative impact on shopping and companies based in the city. A more effective way of controlling congestion is to make public transport services better and encourage people to cycle or walk.”

John Tanner, Oxford City Council executive board member for Cleaner Greener Oxford and transport, said the measure would price those on lower incomes out of the city.

He said: “A better solution would be, like Nottingham, to charge all employers who have more than 10 parking spaces about £1 a day. That would encourage them not to waste space on parking.”

The Local Transport Plan stage one consultation started on June 20 and will finish on August 1. Visit consultations.oxfordshire.gov.uk/consult.ti/LTP4

Our top stories:

Black Friday: Shopping traffic causing chaos around Bicester as police warn to avoid area

Oxford Mail:

1:59pm Friday 28th November 2014

POLICE have urged people to avoid the Bicester area due to heavy traffic into Bicester Village on Black Friday.

John Campbell desperate to seize second chance with Oxford United

Oxford Mail:

9:10am Friday 28th November 2014

JOHN Campbell expects it will be a struggle to sleep tonight as he deals with excitement levels beyond anything he experienced playing in two Wembley finals.

Grant: City bids for share of £144m cycling money

Oxford Mail:

9:00am Friday 28th November 2014

OXFORD’S share of a newly-announced £114m grant could be spent on a fully connected city cycle network or teaching cycling in schools, campaigners have said.

Drugs conspiracy case jury considers verdict

Oxford Mail: Scales of Justice

8:30am Friday 28th November 2014

The jury in the case of a pub boss and building company director accused of being involved in a drugs conspiracy has retired to consider its verdict.

Queen of crime who ‘thrilled and inspired a generation’

Oxford Mail:

8:30am Friday 28th November 2014

PD James was yesterday hailed by fellow Oxford literary legend Colin Dexter as ‘one of the most stylish and distinguished modern crime writers’.

Update: Driver taken to hospital after two lorries crash on A34

Oxford Mail: A34 traffic alert

7:38am Friday 28th November 2014

TRAFFIC is "very slow" on the A34 after one lane was closed following a crash between two lorries.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:50am Thu 3 Jul 14

Quentin Walker says...

Hopefully, OCC will not realise how much cash can be made by dealing drugs...
Hopefully, OCC will not realise how much cash can be made by dealing drugs... Quentin Walker
  • Score: 0

11:48am Thu 3 Jul 14

Gunslinger says...

"OCC has said it could not rule out the measure as a way to fund large new transport schemes proposed in a consultation document on the Local Transport Plan"

So once again, like parking penalties, authorities are looking at these measures primarily as a revenue source rather than looking at what the actual impact might be.

Authorities cannot be trusted with additional income from fines and fees not to use it to paper over shortfalls in general budgets they should be spending on anyway.

In my opinion this should only be considered in relation to a specific major project (eg light rail scheme), and then only after a referendum - as happened in Manchester a few years ago.
"OCC has said it could not rule out the measure as a way to fund large new transport schemes proposed in a consultation document on the Local Transport Plan" So once again, like parking penalties, authorities are looking at these measures primarily as a revenue source rather than looking at what the actual impact might be. Authorities cannot be trusted with additional income from fines and fees not to use it to paper over shortfalls in general budgets they should be spending on anyway. In my opinion this should only be considered in relation to a specific major project (eg light rail scheme), and then only after a referendum - as happened in Manchester a few years ago. Gunslinger
  • Score: 4

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree