Walk draws line on travel option

Transport group committee member Nigel Rose, front, and walkers ready to set out along the old railway from South Leigh

Transport group committee member Nigel Rose, front, and walkers ready to set out along the old railway from South Leigh Buy this photo

First published in News
Last updated

CAMPAIGNERS for better transport links for West Oxfordshire walked along part of the former Witney railway branch line to highlight their campaign.

The Witney Oxford Transport Group arranged the walk on Saturday along a mile of the former railway trackbed, near South Leigh.

The group has held talks with Oxfordshire County Council, asking it to look at sustainable ways of improving links between the district and Oxford, rather than focusing on changes to the A40 road.

They also want the council to update a report it commissioned in 2001 into the feasibility and possible costs of reopening the railway.   

Maurizio Fantato, a member of the group’s committee, who lives in Bampton, said: “We’re trying to create awareness for having a public transport alternative, because the problems are putting a stranglehold on the economy of the district.

“We don’t believe that dualling the A40 will be a solution, because there will always be bottlenecks on it. It would also cost twice as much. We’re pushing for a consultation by the council that would look at the alternatives.

“It needs to be a proper assessment, that takes into account the number and demographics of the houses to be built in the area.”

The group says possible options could include using parts of the former railway route between Witney and Oxford for trams or a guided busway system.

Mr Fantato added: “The point is trying to find a few thousand pounds that are required for the report to be updated.”

Our top stories:

Special report: The city where it can be 19 times your salary for a home

Oxford Mail:

9:00am Monday 22nd December 2014

THERE is no longer anywhere cheap to live in Oxford, leaving average earners priced out of the market house prices up to 19 times the media salary, new figures show.

UPDATE: A40 reopens lorry carrying egg boxes catches fire near Witney + more pictures

Oxford Mail:

11:10am Monday 22nd December 2014

A LORRY containing egg boxes has caught fire on the A40 near Witney.   

A4130 blocked after car goes into ditch

Oxford Mail: a4130 alert

1:19pm Monday 22nd December 2014

THE A4130 is partially blocked in both directions by a car crash between Didcot and Brightwell-cum-Sotwell.

Oxford chosen to host new NHS genetics research centre to improve care

Oxford Mail:

12:10pm Monday 22nd December 2014

PEOPLE in Oxfordshire with cancer and rare diseases could get advanced diagnosis and treatment under a new genetics project.

What brilliant picture is in our Oxford Mail Advent Calendar today?

Oxford Mail:

6:00am Tuesday 9th December 2014

December is Advent Calendar time and we have a special new interactive graphic for you each and every day until Christmas Eve. I've chosen the best 24 pictures of 2014 and I'll be unveiling one a day - so what is behind's today's door?

Guess which of the great and good sent these Christmas cards

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Monday 22nd December 2014

YOU know you’re starting to go places when you get Christmas cards from Oxfordshire's great and the good. Here's David Cameron's offering but can you guess who is responsible for the other five hidden in our interactive graphic and then read why they chose them

Much-loved narrowboat taken out of commission

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Monday 22nd December 2014

A NARROWBOAT that has delighted elderly and disabled people with canal trips for more than two decades has sailed her last.

Campaigner welcomes move to approve new kidney cancer drug

Oxford Mail: Photograph of the Author

7:00am Monday 22nd December 2014

CANCER campaigner Clive Stone has praised health bosses he once fought against for passing a kidney cancer drug, but pledged to fight for other sufferers.

Boris gets a reminder to return book to Oxford college's library

Oxford Mail:

6:30am Monday 22nd December 2014

MAYOR of London Boris Johnson had a confession to make when he visited Oxford to sign copies of his latest book.

Upgrade locks, say police, after spate of burglaries

Oxford Mail: Thames Valley Police logo

6:30am Monday 22nd December 2014

BURGLARIES that have all used the same technique to break door locks have prompted a warning by police for residents to improve their home security.

Firefighters battle loft blaze in Witney

Oxford Mail: Fire engine Oxfordshire

10:01am Sunday 21st December 2014

FIREFIGHTERS were able to stop a roof fire spreading and destroying the rest of the house last night.

Skye Hall's family: Our first Christmas without our brave son

Oxford Mail:

9:00am Saturday 20th December 2014

LOOM bands are taking over the house of Skye Hall’s family as they prepare to spend their first Christmas without the brave youngster who died in August.

Hudspeth backs councillors in demand to be told man's pay in allowances row

Oxford Mail: Ian Hudspeth

8:30am Saturday 20th December 2014

OXFORDSHIRE County Council leader Ian Hudspeth has backed councillors Rodney Rose and Kevin Bulmer who asked a voter to reveal his wages when he challenged them over a 19 per cent hike in their allowance.

Two arrested for GBH after man injured in fight

Oxford Mail:

5:24pm Saturday 20th December 2014

Two teenagers from Witney were arrested last night after a man suffered a broken arm.

Comments (10)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:05am Wed 18 Jun 14

DEnright says...

Thanks to the organisers for a fun walk through the undergrowth! It is clear that the old rail line offers more options for reducing congestion on the A40. We need to get action on this as soon as possible, and I hope the County honour their promise to fund an update of the feasibility study.
Thanks to the organisers for a fun walk through the undergrowth! It is clear that the old rail line offers more options for reducing congestion on the A40. We need to get action on this as soon as possible, and I hope the County honour their promise to fund an update of the feasibility study. DEnright
  • Score: 2

12:07pm Wed 18 Jun 14

Andrew:Oxford says...

DEnright wrote:
Thanks to the organisers for a fun walk through the undergrowth! It is clear that the old rail line offers more options for reducing congestion on the A40. We need to get action on this as soon as possible, and I hope the County honour their promise to fund an update of the feasibility study.
It doesn't take a genius to work out that a line (of whichever variety) that ran from Carerton/Witney to Oxford would be very well used .

Just take a look at Alloa for example. This re-opened route to a single station in a town of 18,000 people is used by around 400,000 passengers a year.

Witney is larger and it would have stops at Carterton and Eynsham too and the obvious option of a large park & ride of the A40. So you are starting with a potential usage of around 800,000 passenger journeys a year into Oxford or beyond.

Perhaps if the people of Oxfordshire really want public transport infrastructure improvements - they will have to start voting SNP...
[quote][p][bold]DEnright[/bold] wrote: Thanks to the organisers for a fun walk through the undergrowth! It is clear that the old rail line offers more options for reducing congestion on the A40. We need to get action on this as soon as possible, and I hope the County honour their promise to fund an update of the feasibility study.[/p][/quote]It doesn't take a genius to work out that a line (of whichever variety) that ran from Carerton/Witney to Oxford would be very well used . Just take a look at Alloa for example. This re-opened route to a single station in a town of 18,000 people is used by around 400,000 passengers a year. Witney is larger and it would have stops at Carterton and Eynsham too and the obvious option of a large park & ride of the A40. So you are starting with a potential usage of around 800,000 passenger journeys a year into Oxford or beyond. Perhaps if the people of Oxfordshire really want public transport infrastructure improvements - they will have to start voting SNP... Andrew:Oxford
  • Score: 0

12:45pm Wed 18 Jun 14

icba1957 says...

Committee member Maurizio Fantato, who lives in Bampton, said: “We don’t believe that dualling the A40 will be a solution because there will always be bottlenecks on it. It would also cost twice as much."

Twice as much as what???

Fact is, the line has been built on at several locations, so simply re-opening it is not an option. Any other scheme would cost a fortune, and the county council certainly doesn't have the money to fund it!

That they only walked a mile of the line speaks volumes in itself.
Committee member Maurizio Fantato, who lives in Bampton, said: “We don’t believe that dualling the A40 will be a solution because there will always be bottlenecks on it. It would also cost twice as much." Twice as much as what??? Fact is, the line has been built on at several locations, so simply re-opening it is not an option. Any other scheme would cost a fortune, and the county council certainly doesn't have the money to fund it! That they only walked a mile of the line speaks volumes in itself. icba1957
  • Score: -1

1:25pm Wed 18 Jun 14

King Joke says...

Andrew:Oxford wrote:
DEnright wrote:
Thanks to the organisers for a fun walk through the undergrowth! It is clear that the old rail line offers more options for reducing congestion on the A40. We need to get action on this as soon as possible, and I hope the County honour their promise to fund an update of the feasibility study.
It doesn't take a genius to work out that a line (of whichever variety) that ran from Carerton/Witney to Oxford would be very well used .

Just take a look at Alloa for example. This re-opened route to a single station in a town of 18,000 people is used by around 400,000 passengers a year.

Witney is larger and it would have stops at Carterton and Eynsham too and the obvious option of a large park & ride of the A40. So you are starting with a potential usage of around 800,000 passenger journeys a year into Oxford or beyond.

Perhaps if the people of Oxfordshire really want public transport infrastructure improvements - they will have to start voting SNP...
You are having a bubble bath aren't you? Many of the improvements up there were commenced before the current SNP adminstration came in. The SNP have actually put north of a billion into a new Forth Road Bridge which will do nothing for PT. Then they are forcing through the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route and dualling the A9, both of which will generate much more high-speed car traffic and undermine the excellent inter-urban bus network. Not everywhere in Scotland will ever be on the rail network owing to the topography so Citylink/Megabus fulfil a vital rail feeder role. THe SNP are a motorists' party first and foremost and I wouldn't trust them to continue developing either the rail or bus networks once current improvments are complete.
[quote][p][bold]Andrew:Oxford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DEnright[/bold] wrote: Thanks to the organisers for a fun walk through the undergrowth! It is clear that the old rail line offers more options for reducing congestion on the A40. We need to get action on this as soon as possible, and I hope the County honour their promise to fund an update of the feasibility study.[/p][/quote]It doesn't take a genius to work out that a line (of whichever variety) that ran from Carerton/Witney to Oxford would be very well used . Just take a look at Alloa for example. This re-opened route to a single station in a town of 18,000 people is used by around 400,000 passengers a year. Witney is larger and it would have stops at Carterton and Eynsham too and the obvious option of a large park & ride of the A40. So you are starting with a potential usage of around 800,000 passenger journeys a year into Oxford or beyond. Perhaps if the people of Oxfordshire really want public transport infrastructure improvements - they will have to start voting SNP...[/p][/quote]You are having a bubble bath aren't you? Many of the improvements up there were commenced before the current SNP adminstration came in. The SNP have actually put north of a billion into a new Forth Road Bridge which will do nothing for PT. Then they are forcing through the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route and dualling the A9, both of which will generate much more high-speed car traffic and undermine the excellent inter-urban bus network. Not everywhere in Scotland will ever be on the rail network owing to the topography so Citylink/Megabus fulfil a vital rail feeder role. THe SNP are a motorists' party first and foremost and I wouldn't trust them to continue developing either the rail or bus networks once current improvments are complete. King Joke
  • Score: 0

1:29pm Wed 18 Jun 14

King Joke says...

icba1957 wrote:
Committee member Maurizio Fantato, who lives in Bampton, said: “We don’t believe that dualling the A40 will be a solution because there will always be bottlenecks on it. It would also cost twice as much."

Twice as much as what???

Fact is, the line has been built on at several locations, so simply re-opening it is not an option. Any other scheme would cost a fortune, and the county council certainly doesn't have the money to fund it!

That they only walked a mile of the line speaks volumes in itself.
Development over the formation, not least at Witney Station, is not a problem if you use a tram-train solution which can just divert to street running where necessary.
[quote][p][bold]icba1957[/bold] wrote: Committee member Maurizio Fantato, who lives in Bampton, said: “We don’t believe that dualling the A40 will be a solution because there will always be bottlenecks on it. It would also cost twice as much." Twice as much as what??? Fact is, the line has been built on at several locations, so simply re-opening it is not an option. Any other scheme would cost a fortune, and the county council certainly doesn't have the money to fund it! That they only walked a mile of the line speaks volumes in itself.[/p][/quote]Development over the formation, not least at Witney Station, is not a problem if you use a tram-train solution which can just divert to street running where necessary. King Joke
  • Score: 2

9:46pm Wed 18 Jun 14

Andrew:Oxford says...

icba1957 wrote:
Committee member Maurizio Fantato, who lives in Bampton, said: “We don’t believe that dualling the A40 will be a solution because there will always be bottlenecks on it. It would also cost twice as much."

Twice as much as what???

Fact is, the line has been built on at several locations, so simply re-opening it is not an option. Any other scheme would cost a fortune, and the county council certainly doesn't have the money to fund it!

That they only walked a mile of the line speaks volumes in itself.
It is a popular misconception amongst rail enthusiasts that a re-opened line has to follow the exact path of the dismantled legacy line.

Whilst there is a certain convenience in using elements of a legacy route, it is not a legal requirement.
[quote][p][bold]icba1957[/bold] wrote: Committee member Maurizio Fantato, who lives in Bampton, said: “We don’t believe that dualling the A40 will be a solution because there will always be bottlenecks on it. It would also cost twice as much." Twice as much as what??? Fact is, the line has been built on at several locations, so simply re-opening it is not an option. Any other scheme would cost a fortune, and the county council certainly doesn't have the money to fund it! That they only walked a mile of the line speaks volumes in itself.[/p][/quote]It is a popular misconception amongst rail enthusiasts that a re-opened line has to follow the exact path of the dismantled legacy line. Whilst there is a certain convenience in using elements of a legacy route, it is not a legal requirement. Andrew:Oxford
  • Score: 1

9:55pm Wed 18 Jun 14

Andrew:Oxford says...

King Joke wrote:
Andrew:Oxford wrote:
DEnright wrote:
Thanks to the organisers for a fun walk through the undergrowth! It is clear that the old rail line offers more options for reducing congestion on the A40. We need to get action on this as soon as possible, and I hope the County honour their promise to fund an update of the feasibility study.
It doesn't take a genius to work out that a line (of whichever variety) that ran from Carerton/Witney to Oxford would be very well used .

Just take a look at Alloa for example. This re-opened route to a single station in a town of 18,000 people is used by around 400,000 passengers a year.

Witney is larger and it would have stops at Carterton and Eynsham too and the obvious option of a large park & ride of the A40. So you are starting with a potential usage of around 800,000 passenger journeys a year into Oxford or beyond.

Perhaps if the people of Oxfordshire really want public transport infrastructure improvements - they will have to start voting SNP...
You are having a bubble bath aren't you? Many of the improvements up there were commenced before the current SNP adminstration came in. The SNP have actually put north of a billion into a new Forth Road Bridge which will do nothing for PT. Then they are forcing through the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route and dualling the A9, both of which will generate much more high-speed car traffic and undermine the excellent inter-urban bus network. Not everywhere in Scotland will ever be on the rail network owing to the topography so Citylink/Megabus fulfil a vital rail feeder role. THe SNP are a motorists' party first and foremost and I wouldn't trust them to continue developing either the rail or bus networks once current improvments are complete.
I suspect dualling the A9 to permit LGVs to operate above 40mph will be helpful in the provison of a swifter and more reliable coach timetable. It's a road I know very well.

The HML does need improvements though - at the moment it's easier to get to London before 9am than Edinburgh. On a Sunday the earliest service doesn't get to Edinburgh until after 1pm

The anti-Aberdeen bypass campaign was orchestrated by a bloke who lives in Newcastle.

Wee 'Eck has expressed interest in extending Borders Rail to Newcastle...
[quote][p][bold]King Joke[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Andrew:Oxford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]DEnright[/bold] wrote: Thanks to the organisers for a fun walk through the undergrowth! It is clear that the old rail line offers more options for reducing congestion on the A40. We need to get action on this as soon as possible, and I hope the County honour their promise to fund an update of the feasibility study.[/p][/quote]It doesn't take a genius to work out that a line (of whichever variety) that ran from Carerton/Witney to Oxford would be very well used . Just take a look at Alloa for example. This re-opened route to a single station in a town of 18,000 people is used by around 400,000 passengers a year. Witney is larger and it would have stops at Carterton and Eynsham too and the obvious option of a large park & ride of the A40. So you are starting with a potential usage of around 800,000 passenger journeys a year into Oxford or beyond. Perhaps if the people of Oxfordshire really want public transport infrastructure improvements - they will have to start voting SNP...[/p][/quote]You are having a bubble bath aren't you? Many of the improvements up there were commenced before the current SNP adminstration came in. The SNP have actually put north of a billion into a new Forth Road Bridge which will do nothing for PT. Then they are forcing through the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route and dualling the A9, both of which will generate much more high-speed car traffic and undermine the excellent inter-urban bus network. Not everywhere in Scotland will ever be on the rail network owing to the topography so Citylink/Megabus fulfil a vital rail feeder role. THe SNP are a motorists' party first and foremost and I wouldn't trust them to continue developing either the rail or bus networks once current improvments are complete.[/p][/quote]I suspect dualling the A9 to permit LGVs to operate above 40mph will be helpful in the provison of a swifter and more reliable coach timetable. It's a road I know very well. The HML does need improvements though - at the moment it's easier to get to London before 9am than Edinburgh. On a Sunday the earliest service doesn't get to Edinburgh until after 1pm The anti-Aberdeen bypass campaign was orchestrated by a bloke who lives in Newcastle. Wee 'Eck has expressed interest in extending Borders Rail to Newcastle... Andrew:Oxford
  • Score: 0

6:56am Thu 19 Jun 14

King Joke says...

There is no need to spend £3bn dualling the A9, as Fishy Salmond is doing, to allow HGVs to travel at 50 mph - just change the speed limit.

You misunderstand how the 'coach' network in Scotland operates. It's actually more like an interurban bus network, and works well precisely because the road network is less motorway-intensive than in England, and trunk roads penetrate areas of population much more closely.

The fact the SNP is not dualling or speeding up the Highland Main Line tells you all about where their priorities lie.
There is no need to spend £3bn dualling the A9, as Fishy Salmond is doing, to allow HGVs to travel at 50 mph - just change the speed limit. You misunderstand how the 'coach' network in Scotland operates. It's actually more like an interurban bus network, and works well precisely because the road network is less motorway-intensive than in England, and trunk roads penetrate areas of population much more closely. The fact the SNP is not dualling or speeding up the Highland Main Line tells you all about where their priorities lie. King Joke
  • Score: 0

9:55am Thu 19 Jun 14

Hugh Jaeger says...

icba1957 wrote:
Committee member Maurizio Fantato, who lives in Bampton, said: “We don’t believe that dualling the A40 will be a solution because there will always be bottlenecks on it. It would also cost twice as much."

Twice as much as what???

Fact is, the line has been built on at several locations, so simply re-opening it is not an option. Any other scheme would cost a fortune, and the county council certainly doesn't have the money to fund it!

That they only walked a mile of the line speaks volumes in itself.
Maurizio means dualling would cost twice as much as a rapid transit. The old trackbed covers eight miles from Yarnton to Witney and most of it is unobstructed. At Eynsham the trading estate & B4449 occupy only just over 1/2 a mile; a new transit line would simply parallel them a few yards to the north or south.

The A40 Witney Bypass embankment is too low for heavy rail to pass underneath, but trams or tram-trains could dive underneath as they can take much steeper gradients. Most trains struggle on any gradient steeper than about 1 in 70. Trams climb 1 in 10 easily, and steeper if they really have to.

The fact that supporters walked only one of the eight miles is not evidence against reopening the route. The old trackbed is not a public right of way and this mile was walked because the landowner supports a rapid transit. And because the line has been closed for 34 years it is overgrown: big deal!

A40 congestion is an acute and chronic problem. The first step to solving it is being positive, not adopting an "it can't be done" attitude.
http://witneyoxfordt
ransport.wordpress.c
om/
[quote][p][bold]icba1957[/bold] wrote: Committee member Maurizio Fantato, who lives in Bampton, said: “We don’t believe that dualling the A40 will be a solution because there will always be bottlenecks on it. It would also cost twice as much." Twice as much as what??? Fact is, the line has been built on at several locations, so simply re-opening it is not an option. Any other scheme would cost a fortune, and the county council certainly doesn't have the money to fund it! That they only walked a mile of the line speaks volumes in itself.[/p][/quote]Maurizio means dualling would cost twice as much as a rapid transit. The old trackbed covers eight miles from Yarnton to Witney and most of it is unobstructed. At Eynsham the trading estate & B4449 occupy only just over 1/2 a mile; a new transit line would simply parallel them a few yards to the north or south. The A40 Witney Bypass embankment is too low for heavy rail to pass underneath, but trams or tram-trains could dive underneath as they can take much steeper gradients. Most trains struggle on any gradient steeper than about 1 in 70. Trams climb 1 in 10 easily, and steeper if they really have to. The fact that supporters walked only one of the eight miles is not evidence against reopening the route. The old trackbed is not a public right of way and this mile was walked because the landowner supports a rapid transit. And because the line has been closed for 34 years it is overgrown: big deal! A40 congestion is an acute and chronic problem. The first step to solving it is being positive, not adopting an "it can't be done" attitude. http://witneyoxfordt ransport.wordpress.c om/ Hugh Jaeger
  • Score: 0

10:01am Thu 19 Jun 14

King Joke says...

If it were cheaper than building a new formation you could run 'on street' along the Eynsham bypass, I've never seen another vehicle on it so there is easily capacity to run trams without delaying them.
If it were cheaper than building a new formation you could run 'on street' along the Eynsham bypass, I've never seen another vehicle on it so there is easily capacity to run trams without delaying them. King Joke
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree