Science park would provide 1,200 jobs as Kidlington plan likely to be submitted in next two weeks

Oxford Mail: Co-investor Angus Bates with plans for the science park on land at Langford Lane. Picture: Andrew Walmsley Buy this photo Co-investor Angus Bates with plans for the science park on land at Langford Lane. Picture: Andrew Walmsley

PLANS are to be submitted for a science park in Kidlington that developers say will create 1,200 jobs.

A planning application is to be submitted in the next two weeks for Oxford Technology Park in Langford Lane, opposite Oxford Airport.

Landowner Angus Bates wants to create a development similar to science parks in Harwell and Milton Park.

Work would begin next year and developing the site – a former playing field next to an ambulance station – would take over a decade if permission is given.

The 38,000sqm site would include 380 parking spaces, office, laboratory and warehouse space and a possible hotel to reduce travel from the site.

Mr Bates said: “Oxford has had industrial estates at pretty strong market rates but we are hoping to produce something that is a departure from that.”

The Kidlington plan would target establishing hi-tech and biotech companies looking to expand to up to a dozen units, Mr Bates said. His Hill Street Holdings firm is the majority shareholder in the project, a partnership with London’s Bloombridge Development Partners. The holding company has already been involved in a number of projects in Suffolk and Essex, as well as the 3.5 acre Oxford Office Village in Kidlington.

Langford Lane is in the Green Belt but Cherwell District Council has pledged to review this as part of its local plan, which sets future district development.

Richard Cutler, a partner at Bloombridge, said he expected the development to attract pharmaceutical and performance engineering firms.

He said: “Kidlington doesn’t have any employment land and hasn’t for many years.

“This is recognised by the council and we have therefore negotiated with them to release this land from the Green Belt to provide employment.”

Oxfordshire Chamber of Commerce small and medium enterprise business manager Gavin Spencer said: “The location opposite Oxford Airport makes the location ideal for potential occupants, as well as the proximity to motorways.”

But Helen Marshall, the director of the Oxfordshire branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England, said the application was premature.

She said: “We will look at the plans, but in principle CPRE would be strongly opposed to a development such as this within the Green Belt as it would affect the openness of the land and create knock-on impacts such as traffic and noise.”

Our top stories:

COMMONWEALTH GAMES: It's Rivers of gold for Dan

Oxford Mail:

9:00am Wednesday 30th July 2014

Shooter Dan Rivers said it was an amazing feeling to win a Commonwealth Games gold medal at Glasgow 2014.

What is causing a bit of a stink - Nasty whiff hangs over city and county

Oxford Mail:

9:00am Wednesday 30th July 2014

ITS VILE smell has nauseated residents and baffled officials.

Molly’s the face of our city’s fight to find cure for cancer

Oxford Mail:

8:30am Wednesday 30th July 2014

CANCER survivor Molly Crawford is today launching a new campaign to fund more scientific research in the city.

Driver and biker face bans for 100+mph speeds

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Wednesday 30th July 2014

A CAR driver was clocked doing 109mph and a motorcyclist caught doing 108mph on a busy road south of Oxford.

Film aims to make Banbury the town of the living dead

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Wednesday 30th July 2014

A VIRUS raising the dead and triggering a worldwide apocalypse is to be unleashed in Banbury.

Drivers facing queues on the A34 due to roundabout works

Oxford Mail: A34 traffic alert

7:38am Wednesday 30th July 2014

DRIVERS this morning will face queues again on the A34, with traffic starting to stack back south of Kennington.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:44pm Sat 14 Jun 14

faatmaan says...

another exercise in moving brownfield sited companies to picturesque greenfield sites, with their workforces, so any employment gains would be very limited, and I am not a conservationist. This trend needs to be stemmed.
another exercise in moving brownfield sited companies to picturesque greenfield sites, with their workforces, so any employment gains would be very limited, and I am not a conservationist. This trend needs to be stemmed. faatmaan
  • Score: -1

2:04pm Sat 14 Jun 14

Andrew:Oxford says...

faatmaan wrote:
another exercise in moving brownfield sited companies to picturesque greenfield sites, with their workforces, so any employment gains would be very limited, and I am not a conservationist. This trend needs to be stemmed.
The notorious Oxford(shire) faction of the CPRE and the Greens have been demanding that new homes in Oxford are built on former brownfield sites*...

Where are these city brownfield sites to come from if commercial activities aren't moved to greenfield sites?



*Although they also complain about properties being built on degraded former brownfield sites too...
[quote][p][bold]faatmaan[/bold] wrote: another exercise in moving brownfield sited companies to picturesque greenfield sites, with their workforces, so any employment gains would be very limited, and I am not a conservationist. This trend needs to be stemmed.[/p][/quote]The notorious Oxford(shire) faction of the CPRE and the Greens have been demanding that new homes in Oxford are built on former brownfield sites*... Where are these city brownfield sites to come from if commercial activities aren't moved to greenfield sites? *Although they also complain about properties being built on degraded former brownfield sites too... Andrew:Oxford
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree