‘20 limits distract motorists and should be abandoned’

‘20 limits distract motorists and should be abandoned’

‘20 limits distract motorists and should be abandoned’

First published in News Oxford Mail: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter covering North Oxford, Jericho and Summertown. Call me on 01865 425498

OXFORD’s 20mph speed zones should be abolished because they distract drivers, it has been claimed.

Institute of Advanced Motorists consultant Mark McArthur-Christie said drivers spent too much time watching speedometers and should instead be trained to drive more slowly.

It comes as the institute released figures showing half of drivers were against blanket 20mph speed limits on urban roads.

Mr McArthur-Christie, from Witney, who is also a former lobbyist for the Association of British Drivers, said: “There is no doubt that the more hazards there are the slower you need to go and there are more in urban areas.

“But on roads like Botley Road and St Giles they are not helpful because they are places where it is perfectly safe to go at 30mph.”

Anna Semlyen, campaign director of 20’s Plenty for Us and a former Oxford University student, said the survey carried out by Institute of Advanced Motorists was “a nonsense”.

She said: “McArthur-Christie’s claims are rubbish. You have got to look at your speedometer whatever the limit may be. There is no proof that people are more dangerous at 20mph. In fact, you are more safe because your stopping distance is shorter.

“The institute asked drivers the wrong question and all this is just scaremongering.

“Nobody is asking for a blanket limit of 20mph to be imposed.

“Getting rid of the 20mph zones in Oxford would be a very misguided idea – there really is no disadvantage to them. In residential areas 30mph is just too fast.

“It is wrong to have children living on streets that are 30mph, because their parents will want them to stay inside their homes.”

Mr McArthur-Christie said: “It is also an issue for me when I’m cycling because it means drivers are alongside you for far too long, looking at their speedometers and not me. That is worrying, especially when turning left. You get compliance but at a risk to safety.

“We should instead be sending people on speed awareness courses and training them to drive slower naturally. The issue needs to be re-examined completely. The 20mph zones need to be reversed and we should not implement any more.”

Sections of major city centre roads and residential streets across Oxford were made 20mph zones in a £250,000 move by Oxfordshire County Council on September 1, 2009. St Clement’s, Botley Road, St Giles, High Street and The Plain all saw accidents fall from between 22 and 66 per cent in the four years that followed.

Our top stories:

Video special report: Banbury sex gang victim speaks + police and arrest interviews of defendants

Oxford Mail:

10:00am Saturday 18th April 2015

ONE of the victims in the Banbury sex abuse case has said she'd like to help others going through the same as she did.

Sewage flows down the street as drains back up

Oxford Mail:

2:00pm Saturday 18th April 2015

SEWAGE overflowing at a block of flats in Barton has sparked anger from residents.

Reward to find cancer victim's missing dog

Oxford Mail:

12:58pm Saturday 18th April 2015

A CANCER sufferer has offered a “substantial financial reward” for anyone who can find her missing dog.

And they're off! More than 100 classic cars leave the Mini plant in Cowley for Longbridge Rally

Oxford Mail:

11:09am Saturday 18th April 2015

A CONVOY of more than 100 Minis, Morris Minors and other classic cars left the BMW plant in Cowley this morning to parade through Oxford.

Video: Sport for dogs is a bit of a Rhum-do

Oxford Mail:

10:00am Saturday 18th April 2015

YOU may not have heard of Flyball – the team sport for dogs.

It's just not bon: Raymond Blanc joins campaign against chilled hospital food

Oxford Mail: Raymond Blanc is quite the fan of Mary Berry

9:00am Saturday 18th April 2015

RAYMOND Blanc has backed a campaign to halt the closure of community hospital kitchens in Oxfordshire.

Slavery accused bailed after £40k security offered

Oxford Mail:

8:20am Saturday 18th April 2015

A WOMAN charged with conspiring to keep a man as a slave was granted bail yesterday after her brother-in-law offered a £40,000 security payment.

Video: Jayden’s memorial garden is place for everyone, says mum

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Saturday 18th April 2015

THE mother of murdered Jayden Parkinson said she hoped her daughter’s memorial garden would be a place for everyone in the community.

No evidence on boat, Robert Dobinson murder trial jury is told

Oxford Mail:

7:10am Saturday 18th April 2015

A WOMAN charged with stabbing her boyfriend to death in a supposed love row was not even on the riverbank where he died, her barrister said.

Randolph Hotel: Traffic delayed as bus services are diverted

Oxford Mail:

6:10am Saturday 18th April 2015

THE fire at the Randolph hotel brought the city centre to a standstill on Friday afternoon.

Randolph Hotel: Hundreds of witnesses watch as iconic venue burns

Oxford Mail:

6:00am Saturday 18th April 2015

WITNESSES of the fire that gripped the Randolph Hotel for hours yesterday described the moment they watched one of Oxford’s historic landmarks go up in flames.

Randolph Hotel: We won't let the fire destroy our wedding today

Oxford Mail:

6:00am Saturday 18th April 2015

WEDDING parties, transatlantic tourists and couples celebrating their anniversaries were among the guests evacuated from the five star hotel yesterday afternoon.

Randolph Hotel: Firefighters try to work out what sparked blaze

Oxford Mail:

6:00am Saturday 18th April 2015

FIRE crews are trying to establish exactly what caused the huge blaze at Oxford’s Randolph Hotel yesterday.

Randolph Hotel: Iconic venue has played host to the great, the good and the infamous

Oxford Mail:

5:50am Saturday 18th April 2015

THE Grade II-listed Randolph Hotel was built in 1864 by William Wilkinson, an architect who also designed many other buildings in North Oxford.

Comments (8)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:34pm Mon 26 May 14

Dilligaf2010 says...

I agree, 20mph limits are ridiculous, I drive to the road conditions.
If I'm in a residential area, the last thing that's going to worry me is my speed, I'm too busy watching out for hazards.
A 20mph limit isn't going to stop a child from running between two parked cars, but a driver watching his speedometer, is more likely to knock that child over, than one who's not.
I agree, 20mph limits are ridiculous, I drive to the road conditions. If I'm in a residential area, the last thing that's going to worry me is my speed, I'm too busy watching out for hazards. A 20mph limit isn't going to stop a child from running between two parked cars, but a driver watching his speedometer, is more likely to knock that child over, than one who's not. Dilligaf2010
  • Score: 5

2:46pm Mon 26 May 14

Floflo says...

Dilligaf2010 wrote:
I agree, 20mph limits are ridiculous, I drive to the road conditions.
If I'm in a residential area, the last thing that's going to worry me is my speed, I'm too busy watching out for hazards.
A 20mph limit isn't going to stop a child from running between two parked cars, but a driver watching his speedometer, is more likely to knock that child over, than one who's not.
As I driver I really struggle with the argument that 20 mph is problematic as you need to keep an eye on what speed you are going. If you can't safely stick to 20 mph then is why is 30 mph any better for you?

You are right about children running out. This happens and you can't control it. Of course you can always blame the kids for getting run over. What you can control is your chance of killing the child. At 20 mph if you hit a child it has a 10% chance dying. At 30 mph you have a 90% chance of killing it.
[quote][p][bold]Dilligaf2010[/bold] wrote: I agree, 20mph limits are ridiculous, I drive to the road conditions. If I'm in a residential area, the last thing that's going to worry me is my speed, I'm too busy watching out for hazards. A 20mph limit isn't going to stop a child from running between two parked cars, but a driver watching his speedometer, is more likely to knock that child over, than one who's not.[/p][/quote]As I driver I really struggle with the argument that 20 mph is problematic as you need to keep an eye on what speed you are going. If you can't safely stick to 20 mph then is why is 30 mph any better for you? You are right about children running out. This happens and you can't control it. Of course you can always blame the kids for getting run over. What you can control is your chance of killing the child. At 20 mph if you hit a child it has a 10% chance dying. At 30 mph you have a 90% chance of killing it. Floflo
  • Score: -5

10:03pm Mon 26 May 14

goridebus says...

Hi,
About a month ago my 2 year old son ran out between two parked cars into the road. Fine, I didn't stop him, my fault. But he got hit by a van, and ended up in hospital with a fractured skull. The van was doing 15mph. What would have happened if he had been doing 30 (the limit), or 40?
Seeing my son put in the back of an ambulance is not something that I, nor the van driver, want to see again. The simple fact is that in urban residential streets, slower is better.
He is OK, but before I go to sleep at night I wonder about what might have happened.
So it is all very well saying, well I am a safe driver, blah blah, but the van driver couldn't avoid hitting my son. It is down to the fact he was driving slowly that he is still here. And regardless of whose fault it was, would you want to think of it every day for the rest of your life?
Hi, About a month ago my 2 year old son ran out between two parked cars into the road. Fine, I didn't stop him, my fault. But he got hit by a van, and ended up in hospital with a fractured skull. The van was doing 15mph. What would have happened if he had been doing 30 (the limit), or 40? Seeing my son put in the back of an ambulance is not something that I, nor the van driver, want to see again. The simple fact is that in urban residential streets, slower is better. He is OK, but before I go to sleep at night I wonder about what might have happened. So it is all very well saying, well I am a safe driver, blah blah, but the van driver couldn't avoid hitting my son. It is down to the fact he was driving slowly that he is still here. And regardless of whose fault it was, would you want to think of it every day for the rest of your life? goridebus
  • Score: 1

1:53am Wed 28 May 14

Neonlights says...

"What would have happened if he had been doing 30 (the limit), or 40?"

He would have already gone past before your son had run out.

http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=Jf791DRbb
EE
"What would have happened if he had been doing 30 (the limit), or 40?" He would have already gone past before your son had run out. http://www.youtube.c om/watch?v=Jf791DRbb EE Neonlights
  • Score: 0

9:36pm Wed 28 May 14

goridebus says...

Then he would have been hit by the one behind.
Then he would have been hit by the one behind. goridebus
  • Score: -1

9:37pm Wed 28 May 14

goridebus says...

Then he would have been hit by the one behind. Or the one behind that. Sorry, you are not as clever as you think you are.
Then he would have been hit by the one behind. Or the one behind that. Sorry, you are not as clever as you think you are. goridebus
  • Score: -1

1:00am Thu 29 May 14

Neonlights says...

Quite a busy residential street then.

Why weren't you paying more attention to your son knowing that it's so busy?

Speed itself doesn't kill. There are many other factors too, but speed is the easiest one to blame.
Quite a busy residential street then. Why weren't you paying more attention to your son knowing that it's so busy? Speed itself doesn't kill. There are many other factors too, but speed is the easiest one to blame. Neonlights
  • Score: 1

10:49am Fri 30 May 14

Paul0 says...

Genuine question here: What caused the sudden, dramatic decline in accidents on the roads in the 20 mph zone? It might not be the speed limit -- but whatever it is, we should apply it to other roads.
Genuine question here: What caused the sudden, dramatic decline in accidents on the roads in the 20 mph zone? It might not be the speed limit -- but whatever it is, we should apply it to other roads. Paul0
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree