Barton cancer sufferer loses disabilty benefits appeal

Cancer sufferer Paul Marlow from Barton whose disability living allowance is to be cut after he lost an appeal against an earlier decision

Cancer sufferer Paul Marlow from Barton whose disability living allowance is to be cut after he lost an appeal against an earlier decision

First published in News
Last updated
Oxford Mail: Photograph of the Author by , Crime Reporter, also covering Barton and Wood Farm. Call me on (01865) 425427

A CANCER patient has lost an appeal against a cut to his disability benefit the same month he learned he could have his prostate removed.

Barton resident Paul Marlow — who has suffered from bladder cancer for 10 years — has lost his monthly £218 Disability Living Allowance.

The 56-year-old, a former caterer who served the Queen, was told last summer that he would no longer receive the benefit after a medical assessment.

He appealed the decision, but an independent tribunal hearing in Botley on January 23, found he did not qualify for the money for mobility and care needs.

Mr Marlow said: “It is absolutely disgusting. This cancer is not going to go away.”

He said he felt intimidated at the tribunal in front of the three judges, adding: “It felt as if I was sat there begging.”

The Stowford Road resident, who says he relies on the benefit, has had about 40 operations for tumours in his bladder since his diagnosis in 2003.

His next operation at the Churchill Hospital will be to take away part, or all of his, prostate after it became inflamed because of the problems caused by the cancer.

He said: “All this stress I think has caused the prostate problem.”

Related links

Mr Marlow also suffers from arthritis, the lung disease chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.

He says he uses a mobility scooter and walking stick to get around.

But his income from benefits has now fallen from £990 to £772 a month – in fortnightly £386 income support payments.

Van Coulter, Labour Oxford City Council member for Barton and Sandhills, in September, told the Oxford Mail that the decision was “disgraceful” as Mr Marlow was “genuinely suffering”.

He added: “The cost of this austerity programme is to strip out the compassion from our welfare system.

“Here is an individual, wracked with pain – but a person who won't lie down and still cares and does what he can for his community.”

Oxford East MP Andrew Smith, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions between 2002 and 2004, also said he would be happy to try to help Mr Marlow.

But Department for Work and Pensions spokesman, Stuart Woledge said: “We have looked into the details of this case and are satisfied the correct procedure has been followed.

“We consider a range of evidence when making a decision – including from the claimant’s GP.

“If people want to submit extra evidence then we will look at the case again. People also have a right to appeal if they are not happy with a decision.”

Mr Marlow worked as a caterer for 28 years in London before he moved to Oxford.

He worked at royal venues including Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and Clarence House.

He served the royal family, including the Queen, Prince Charles and Princess Diana, and the Queen Mother.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

4:16pm Sat 1 Feb 14

faatmaan says...

everybody knows somebody claiming DLA or more who barely meets the criteria, alas genuine people seem to always being denied it on minor technicalities. If the providers are this petty with real claimants why have we still got so many people on DLA fiddling the system. Whilst we are at it, why is the Motability scheme still growing when less and less people should now be eligible. It is time the genuine recipients of DLA got a deal that reflects their demonstratable needs especially in terms of home helps, proper provision of housing and associated needs, being disabled is not a crime, pretending to be so should be prosecutable.
everybody knows somebody claiming DLA or more who barely meets the criteria, alas genuine people seem to always being denied it on minor technicalities. If the providers are this petty with real claimants why have we still got so many people on DLA fiddling the system. Whilst we are at it, why is the Motability scheme still growing when less and less people should now be eligible. It is time the genuine recipients of DLA got a deal that reflects their demonstratable needs especially in terms of home helps, proper provision of housing and associated needs, being disabled is not a crime, pretending to be so should be prosecutable. faatmaan
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree