HMO rules will split up low-paid 'family' (From Oxford Mail)
Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting OXFORD NEWS to 80360 or email us
HMO rules will split up low-paid 'family'
7:00am Wednesday 20th March 2013 in News
By Oliver Evans, covering Banbury. Call me on 01865 425271
Jim Hewitt with, from left, Amorindo Hermenegildo, Jorge dos Santos and Alarica dos Santos
A CHURCH leader has criticised Oxford City Council for shared housing rules which are set to divide a “family” of low-paid workers.
The Diocese of Oxford’s David Mason spoke after one of its tenants was told he could no longer provide a home for up to five adults.
Jim Hewitt, 68, said he has taken people into his three-bedroom house with diocese permission to ease pressure on city homes for 15 years.
But he can now only let two people stay at his Monks Close, Blackbird Leys home, under the city’s 2011 Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) regime.
The rules state that homes with three or more non-related people must get a HMO licence from the council.
Mr Mason – diocese director of Glebe and buildings – said: “If the city council is choosing to interpret the HMO regulations in such a restrictive way it will prevent people like Mr Hewitt, who have a heart to support those who are less able to support themselves, from being able to provide a safe family environment on affordable terms.”
Mr Hewitt – last year awarded an MBE for his community work – has mostly taken in people from Timor, south east Asia.
There are currently two people in one bedroom, two each have their own room and a fifth person who sleeps in the living room. They share the £580 a month rent equally.
He said: “I have to tell the people I regard as my family that their willingness to live here as a household and family is not acceptable.”
Mr Hewitt said: “Regulations intended to protect the vulnerable are being used to break up strong relational households and drive people into the rent-for-profit market.”
He said it contrasted with the Government’s “bedroom tax”, where social housing tenants face a cut in housing benefit if they have “spare” bedrooms.
He said: “On the one hand the Government is saying ‘you must make full use of your house, there will be penalties if you don’t’.
“Then they are saying to me ‘you should under-occupy your house’.”
Timorese cleaner Jorge Dos Santos, 35, said: “We are all brothers here and it will be a great shame to split up.”
The HMO regime was introduced in a bid to clamp down on low-quality shared homes.
The council estimates there are 5,000 HMOs, of which 551 have been licensed and 2,709 are awaiting a decision. Some 33 landlords have been taken to court or given a formal caution.
Council spokeswoman Louisa Dean said: “The council would be more than happy to licence the property but neither Mr Hewitt nor the Diocese of Oxford appear willing to apply.”
Mr Hewitt helped run the Blackbird Leys Credit Union for 20 years and used to be a community worker with the Holy Family Church in Cuddesdon Way.
Comments(8)
mytaxes
says...
7:54am Wed 20 Mar 13
HMO Enforcement Team Manager Job No. 03819
Grade 9, Salary Per Annum: £38,042 with possible progression to £40,741 – pay award pending
Contract: Permanent 37 hours per week
HMO Enforcement Officer (x6 Posts) (Job No: 03485)
Grade 6: £25,854 to £29,066 salary per annum
Contract: Permanent 37 hours per week Closing Date: 5th April 2013
Myron Blatz
says...
9:00am Wed 20 Mar 13
online_reader
says...
11:59am Wed 20 Mar 13
Is there a reason why he has not applied? What are the costs involved? Is he simply objecting because he believes he's a decent chap and shouldn't be subjected to rules aimed at curtailing rogues? I think this story needs a bit more detail.
Lord Palmerstone
says...
1:24pm Wed 20 Mar 13
Andrew:Oxford
says...
1:35pm Wed 20 Mar 13
online_reader wrote:Shouldn't it be the property owner (the Diocese) that applies for the HMO?
I do think that Mr Hewitt ought to apply for a licence as something does have to be done about the numerous dodgy landlords and the same rules must apply to everyone; sadly administering them does cost money.
Is there a reason why he has not applied? What are the costs involved? Is he simply objecting because he believes he's a decent chap and shouldn't be subjected to rules aimed at curtailing rogues? I think this story needs a bit more detail.
It may be an inconvenience, but the church shouldn't be above the law.
Johno3
says...
7:40pm Wed 20 Mar 13
I have reported him repeatedly to the HMO department at the council and have received nothing. What do these HMO enforcement officers do all day?
HMO is just making it harder for young working professionals to find somewhere to live and therefore giving more license to those landlords with a HMO license to charge obscene rents. I don't want to live in a house with horrible fire doors, various ugly fire alarms and fire blankets attached to the walls, but I am forced to do so as a 26 year old professional living with friends.
jockox3
says...
4:48pm Thu 21 Mar 13
It took them 16 years to develop these rules and they were wrong from the launch. Why do we accept that these people have some right to make rules by which we must live. They're not competent, as Acton said, “The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is unfit to govern.”
Lord Palmerstone says...
7:37am Wed 20 Mar 13
But the voters in the City aren't going to replace the horrible morass of Labour and Social Democrat (mini Labour, Liberal, call it what you will) with members of mature parties and this nonsense is going to continue. Frankly, you deserve it if you've not the guts to get rid of it.