'Grade change hit our Ofsted report' says headteacher

DISAPPOINTED: Headteacher Chris Harris Buy this photo » DISAPPOINTED: Headteacher Chris Harris

A HEADTEACHER has said controversial changes to English GCSE grade boundaries contributed to a critical inspectors’ report.

Chris Harris, of Larkmead School, Abingdon, spoke after Ofsted said it “requires improvement” following a February inspection.

While Ofsted praised pupil behaviour, it said grades were not good enough and leadership had to improve.

Ahead of a parents’ meeting called by the school tonight, Mr Harris said English grade boundary changes meant up to 40 pupils got a D instead of C.

He expected 54 per cent to get at least five GCSEs grades A* to C, including English and Maths. But the figure from summer exams was 48 per cent. The school is aiming for 60 per cent this year. It will be re-inspected within 12 to 18 months.

Last year the Government came under fire for changing boundaries for the C grade English GCSE tests between January and July.

This meant there were discrepancies between grades achieved in the two different exam periods.

Mr Harris said: “I think there will be a significant uplift in next summer’s results, and they will improve the next two summers as well.”

Schools are graded outstanding, good, requires improvement or inadequate.

Related links

In 2011, Larkmead was given a satisfactory rating under the former system – where schools were then ranked as either outstanding, good, satisfactory or inadequate.

Mr Harris said: “I think the inspectors will come back in on the back of a good set of results and they will see progress.

“There are really high expectations for students and they are not buckling under that pressure, we are improving and actually it is a really exciting time.”

Mr Harris said he was “disappointed” by the judgment but acknowledged the school expected the rating, though he said it is “very close to good”.

He said: “What they saw was good behaviour, teaching getting better all the time, and progress in some areas was good.”

Inspector Robert Ridout’s report says: “Students are not yet achieving well and standards are not high enough in all subjects. There is too much variation in achievement between subjects and it is especially weak in core science and English.”

Pupils typically start school with attainment below that found nationally but do not progress enough to close the gap by Year 11, it said.

But behaviour was praised along with progress in maths and sciences. The school was told it needed to improve teaching so it is consistently good or better, and improve effectiveness of leaders and managers.

Tonight’s meeting will take place at 7pm.

Comments(6)

Andrew:Oxford says...
12:48pm Tue 19 Mar 13

So changes result in a more accurate report?

abfab123 says...
1:27pm Tue 19 Mar 13

54% is hardly an achievement! Should be aiming for 100% surely?

Abingdon Neil says...
1:35pm Tue 19 Mar 13

About 55% gate A*-C grades in maths and english nationally so Larkmead's target looks realistic.

abfab123 says...
4:01pm Tue 19 Mar 13

Nationally we should be aiming for 100%!

Quentin Walker says...
4:59pm Tue 19 Mar 13

It seems to me that OFSTED exists merely to pour scorn upon our schools instead of helping. There have been numerous reports in the Press of inspectors downgrading previously satisfactory schools - they can't all have
got worse, something needs to be done about OFSTED.

I am not involved in education.

Feelingsmatter says...
5:50pm Thu 21 Mar 13

Oh stop making excuses Mr. Harris. It's ridiculous.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree