Lord Mayor hearing held in private again (From Oxford Mail)
Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting OXFORD NEWS to 80360 or email us
Lord Mayor hearing held in private again
11:33am Wednesday 27th February 2013 in News
By Andrew Ffrench, covering Didcot and Wallingford. Call me on 01865 425425
CITY councillors have again voted to ban the public from a disciplinary meeting about Oxford’s Lord Mayor Alan Armitage.
The council’s standards committee is meeting at the Town Hall this morning to rule on whether or not Mr Armitage has broken the councillors’ code of conduct.
The Liberal Democrat councillor for North ward has been accused of making inappropriate comments to a teenage girl at an event in Iffley Road last June.
The Oxford Mail and the public were excluded from a previous standards committee hearing on the case last month on the basis that the schoolgirl and other witnesses could be identified, and that it was not in the public interest.
Following advice from Jeremy Thomas, the council’s head of law and governance, committee members agreed that today’s hearing should be held in private.
The committee took the decision to exclude press and public after Mr Thomas advised councillors that he wanted to protect the privacy of individuals giving evidence to today’s hearing.
He added that the public interest would be protected by the publication of a report at the end of the hearing which would be “appropriately redacted”.
The Oxford Mail was given the opportunity to argue that it should be allowed to attend the hearing as the matter was so serious the committee's deliberations should be made in public rather than in secret.
Six councillors voted that the hearing should be held in private and there was one abstention.
The hearing is continuing.
Comments(3)
Myron Blatz
says...
9:39pm Wed 27 Feb 13
Sandy Wimpole-Smythe
says...
9:58pm Wed 27 Feb 13
Myron Blatz wrote:You may think 'it's not in the same league' as other alleged sex offenders but if he was prepared to make comments like that to a young old girl in public what would he do in private ?
After all the hype in the Oxford Mail, not exactly in the same league as the current debacle over a LibDem Peer's alleged wrong doings, nor some of the more recent 'outings' of high-ranking Roman Catholic clergy in the UK, US and elsewhere - where it wasn't apparently an inappropriate word to a minor at one function, but grossly inappropriate actions by these priests and bishops toward others, over many, many years.
The man should be stripped of any public office without hesitation and a close eye kept on him.
Sandy Wimpole-Smythe says...
6:07pm Wed 27 Feb 13
What exactly does this mean (taken from the later story which we cannot comment on) ?