Care home plans ‘are repugnant’

Cumnor Parish Council chairman Brian Stops talks to residents about the plans Cumnor Parish Council chairman Brian Stops talks to residents about the plans

A CONTROVERSIAL plan for a care home in back gardens near Oxford should be approved, planners have said.

Vale of White Horse District Council planning officer Stuart Walker has recommended councillors approve the Cumnor Hill plan when it is debated on Thursday.

In total, 42 people have objected to the 72-bed development, to go behind three homes opposite Delamare Way, with concerns including overlooking, roads and wildlife.

Rycote Developments proposed to cut into the hillside for the development, to include four separate homes for staff.

Mr Walker said the design – which would need further permission – “could be designed to avoid harmful overlooking”.

The impact on neighbours is “acceptable”, extra traffic would not be “significant”, and wildlife corridors would be maintained, he said.

It would help meet a shortfall in homes for OAPs. Although the site is backed by the district council for eight homes, their loss would “not be significant”.

But importing company director Simon Haigh, whose home is near the site, said the three-storey plan is “totally out of scale” for the area.

Mr Haigh, 56, said: “At the moment, we live in a house that is 100 per cent private, it isn’t surrounded or overlooked by anything at all.

Related links

“What they propose to do is impose a three-storey building that will completely change the nature of our property.”

Neighbour Paul Dixon, the boss of a care home building firm, praised the design, but said its impact would be too great for the area.

The 44-year-old, managing director of Lawrence Baker, Eynsham, said: “I appreciate something will happen there. What I am slightly unhappy about is the scale.”

Cumnor Parish Council said it had “serious doubts” about the suitability of the site, to the rear of 82-88 Cumnor Hill.

Its response to the Vale said: “It would be impossible, if not downright dangerous and frightening, for someone in a wheelchair to be pushed up to Cumnor Hill.”

It said vehicles leaving the site – which would include 15 parking spaces – would be at “serious risk” of an accident because of poor visibility.

It added: “Plots have been developed in such a way that the houses do not intrude on each other, resulting in considerable privacy. What is being proposed is massive and intrusive by any standards.”

Parish council chairman Brian Stops said: “About 50 people turned out to have a look at the site and I spoke to them about the five-page document we are putting forward to the Vale’s planning committee on Thursday. There are big issues around access and it really is a repugnant concept to put it there. “We already have three care homes in Cumnor. It would be too much to accommodate this one. The access is terribly difficult and we think that this is a step too far. We are a non-political council and think that we do represent our constituents’ wishes and, simply put, a lot of people do not want this in Cumnor.” Oxfordshire Badger Group said the disturbance could force the animals into the road, warning: “The council will be held responsible when the badgers are finally driven from Cumnor Hill by the relentless march of developments.”

In November, the council refused plans to knock down 85 Cumnor Hill for 21 homes.

Vale’s planning committee will meet at Abbey House, Abingdon, at 6.30pm.

The public can attend.

Comments (5)

12:35pm Tue 29 Jan 13

Grunden Skip says...

Neighbour Paul Dixon, the boss of a care home building firm, praised the design, but said its impact would be too great for the area.

The 44-year-old, managing director of Lawrence Baker, Eynsham, said: “I appreciate something will happen there. What I am slightly unhappy about is the scale.”

Mr Dixon, well done you have just won NIMBY of the century. You are building 100+ room Three Storey care homes all over the place in other peoples back yards, yet you don't want this one by a rival company in yours. Congratulations. People just click on the projects section of his website. Link below.
http://www.lawrenceb
aker.co.uk/
Neighbour Paul Dixon, the boss of a care home building firm, praised the design, but said its impact would be too great for the area. The 44-year-old, managing director of Lawrence Baker, Eynsham, said: “I appreciate something will happen there. What I am slightly unhappy about is the scale.” Mr Dixon, well done you have just won NIMBY of the century. You are building 100+ room Three Storey care homes all over the place in other peoples back yards, yet you don't want this one by a rival company in yours. Congratulations. People just click on the projects section of his website. Link below. http://www.lawrenceb aker.co.uk/ Grunden Skip

12:46pm Tue 29 Jan 13

oafie says...

Stop building these homes once stuck in one trying to get out into a garden or for some fresh air becomes nigh on impossible for most of the residents......
Stop building these homes once stuck in one trying to get out into a garden or for some fresh air becomes nigh on impossible for most of the residents...... oafie

6:21pm Tue 29 Jan 13

Myron Blatz says...

Seems planners and developer might be missing a few tricks here. If built container-fashion (and maybe using recycled boxes) a developer could possibly tripple available bedspace, and if built on stilts could also increase visitor car spaces, with room for lucrative Bigbucks coffee shop and a range of insiduous gift shops. The opportunities for profit creation are endless - as, presumably, would be the basic weekly fees charged by any Care Home at this prime location, where the word 'care' is often spelt with a capital £ !
Seems planners and developer might be missing a few tricks here. If built container-fashion (and maybe using recycled boxes) a developer could possibly tripple available bedspace, and if built on stilts could also increase visitor car spaces, with room for lucrative Bigbucks coffee shop and a range of insiduous gift shops. The opportunities for profit creation are endless - as, presumably, would be the basic weekly fees charged by any Care Home at this prime location, where the word 'care' is often spelt with a capital £ ! Myron Blatz

7:58pm Tue 29 Jan 13

Foxy Lady1 says...

He we go again ,more building on an area which if covered up with lead to flooding in further areas of Botley. What on earth is going on in peoples heads? Goodbye Green and Pleasant England. Its too late when its all gone.
This home could have been put in the now defunct previous Vale House at Botley on West Way which was a great care home for people with dementia, they could have utilsed that, but no, they decide to build on the gardens again. We have everything being built on in this area at an alarming rate. If you live here and moan, you get called a NIMBY but I see this all over our countryside and try and get the developers to see what they are destroying not creating. But money is at the centre of these projects. Stuart Walker would approve it, its worth millions to the Vale, He must be rubbing his hands with glee.
He we go again ,more building on an area which if covered up with lead to flooding in further areas of Botley. What on earth is going on in peoples heads? Goodbye Green and Pleasant England. Its too late when its all gone. This home could have been put in the now defunct previous Vale House at Botley on West Way which was a great care home for people with dementia, they could have utilsed that, but no, they decide to build on the gardens again. We have everything being built on in this area at an alarming rate. If you live here and moan, you get called a NIMBY but I see this all over our countryside and try and get the developers to see what they are destroying not creating. But money is at the centre of these projects. Stuart Walker would approve it, its worth millions to the Vale, He must be rubbing his hands with glee. Foxy Lady1

7:50am Wed 30 Jan 13

xjohnx says...

The site has already been approved for building.

They just have to decide if it should be houses for eight wealthy families in this high value location or many wealthy OAP's.

I guess the OAP's are marginaly better, in my book.
The site has already been approved for building. They just have to decide if it should be houses for eight wealthy families in this high value location or many wealthy OAP's. I guess the OAP's are marginaly better, in my book. xjohnx

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree