Voles scupper plans for towpath revamp

City councillor Susanna Pressel with her grandson Ewan Currie, four, on the canal towpath which cannot be widened without affecting the habitat of water voles. Picture: OX 56160 Jessica Mann

A water vole

First published in News Oxford Mail: Photograph of the Author by , Senior reporter. Call me on (01865) 425373

THE discovery of water voles next to a towpath has dashed hopes for £200,000 of resurfacing work.

Earlier this year cycling campaigners were delighted when funding was announced to upgrade a neglected 1,100m stretch of the Oxford Canal towpath past Jericho.

But Government-funded charity Sustrans now says the city-centre route will not receive any money because it is 20cm too narrow.

The organisation insists on a minimum width of two metres for “shared use” cycle paths for safety reasons.

And campaigners say there is no chance of the path being widened, because the verge next to the canal is a protected habitat for water voles.

The other side of the towpath is obstructed by a brick wall, so making it wider on that side is impossible.

Susanna Pressel, the Labour city councillor for Jericho and Osney, said she had written to the chief executive of Sustrans asking for the decision to be reconsidered.

“I’m intensely disappointed,” she said. “It looks like Sustrans is not going to budge. Even though many resurfaced towpaths are only 1.5m wide at most and work perfectly fine.

Along some sections of the path, such as next to Aristotle Lane Recreation Ground, it is extremely unpleasant to cycle and walk on.

“So either we have a really dire situation or we have something slightly less than ideal.”

Lib Dem city councillor Jim Campbell said: “It seems to me very unfortunate if, for the sake of eight inches, we are going to lose sufficient funding for a very important project.

“We are contacting as many people in high places as we can to see what can be done.”

Spokesman for Sustrans Matt Hemsley said the charity was willing to investigate solutions, but at the moment it saw no way of resolving the problem.

He said: “The issue is that this path is not wide enough for our guidelines.

“We ask for a minimum of two metres and recommend three, because we want it to be safe for everyone. In this case it would be difficult to add on the extra 20cm because of the wildlife issues with water voles identified in the area.

“This issue probably isn’t going to be resolvable.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:15am Tue 11 Dec 12

mytaxes says...

Good news for those who walk on the towpath.
Good news for those who walk on the towpath. mytaxes
  • Score: 0

2:14pm Tue 11 Dec 12

melyn am byth says...

What do you mean good news, do you use this stretch? it's in a pretty poor state & as unpleasant to walk on as it is to cycle. Just re-surface it, flippin' bureaucrats. ( officials who works by fixed routine without exercising intelligent judgment )
Get it repaired, it's a hazard.
What do you mean good news, do you use this stretch? it's in a pretty poor state & as unpleasant to walk on as it is to cycle. Just re-surface it, flippin' bureaucrats. ( officials who works by fixed routine without exercising intelligent judgment ) Get it repaired, it's a hazard. melyn am byth
  • Score: 0

5:53pm Tue 11 Dec 12

Pavinder Msvarensy says...

melyn am byth, your description of the Sustrans is pretty accurate. But get rid of the the Water Rats, and you get rid of the problem.
melyn am byth, your description of the Sustrans is pretty accurate. But get rid of the the Water Rats, and you get rid of the problem. Pavinder Msvarensy
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree