Oxford launches plan to preserve historic buildings and views (From Oxford Mail)
Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting OXFORD NEWS to 80360 or email us
Oxford launches plan to preserve historic buildings and views
9:00am Tuesday 13th November 2012 in News
By Damian Fantato, covering Summertown, Jericho and North Oxford. Call me on 01865 425429
THE people of Oxford are being asked for their views on what makes the city so special in an attempt to preserve its buildings and views.
For the first time, Oxford City Council is drawing up a heritage plan, listing its historic buildings so they can be saved and preserved. The project also focuses on saving iconic views of the city. Campaigners hope it will mean building work such as Oxford University’s student accommodation block – which sparked outrage for its impact on views from Port Meadow – can be stopped in future.
Campaigner Sushila Dhall said: “Port Meadow is important, not only to the people of Oxford, but it is unique and important to the nation.
“The view from the meadow wasn’t taken seriously by anybody.
“Putting together a heritage plan would be a good idea if the councillors kept to it when deciding on planning applications.”
City councillor Colin Cook, board member for city development, said: “We looked at the views at the time of the planning application for the student blocks and we took the view that it was not sufficiently damaging that we would go for refusal.”
The list of heritage assets will help give weight to current planning policies and will end up as part of the city’s local development framework. It will then become a material consideration in all planning matters and will need to be considered as part of every application. Oxford has more than 1,600 listed buildings, 17 conservation areas and 11 scheduled monuments, of which Port Meadow, in Wolvercote, is one.
The heritage plan includes a register of assets which don’t meet criteria for national designation, but still need to be protected in the eyes of local people.
A consultation has started into the historic character of central Oxford.
Council officers have drawn up reports for 44 areas across the city.
Even the historic value of the Westgate shopping centre has been looked into – although city council officers came to the conclusion the area had “poor aesthetic qualities”.
Peter Thompson, chairman of the Oxford Civic Society, said: “I don’t think we can be complacent about the conservation of our heritage.
“Without this there is a bit of an assumption that Oxford has a historic heritage at its core, but it may be difficult to put the case against specific developments.”
Property developer Martin Young has been trying to develop 29 Old High Street, in the Old Headington conservation area, but has found himself battling against conservation rules.
He said: “Heritage assets need to be protected, but I wouldn’t want to give the council any more power.” The city council is also carrying out conservation area appraisals and creating a character assessment ‘toolkit’ to allow planners to understand the impact of developments.
English Heritage, which is putting £35,000 into the scheme, said it was the first of its kind in the country.
Eventually the findings will be brought together in a new website.
M Cook added: “This is something where we have gone beyond what we are statutorily required to do. We are at the forefront of this.
“We have in Oxford the highest concentration of listed buildings outside of London. This will help decision-makers in the future with planning applications which come before them.
“This will help codify and get down on paper the stuff that may only exist in people’s heads.”
Jacquie Martinez, of the Oxford Preservation Trust, said: “This allows us to bring together policies and tools which already exist and ones which don’t. Oxford is a historic city, but it is also one that needs to continue to develop. It cannot be frozen in time.”
Comments(9)
Darkforbid
says...
9:59am Tue 13 Nov 12
Christine Hovis
says...
12:22pm Tue 13 Nov 12
In the history of Queen's College there's a description of the magnificent vandalism which saw them pull down the old college in the early 1700s and completely replace it.
We mustn't hang onto every old building and every view of every old building unless we want to transform Oxford into a theme park.
train passenger
says...
12:42pm Tue 13 Nov 12
Pavinder Msvarensy
says...
3:54pm Tue 13 Nov 12
With the Grey concrete Council building at the top of the ugly list.
sparky123456
says...
4:26pm Tue 13 Nov 12
mandate
says...
12:19pm Wed 14 Nov 12
In fact, Oxford is better enjoyed by walking in the actual centre. Carfax Tower suffices nicely for those wishing to see the unkempt sprouting spires, and beyond.
Oxford has become tatty and is in desperate need of a revamp. Just look at pictures of the London skyline. A perfect combination of old and new buildings. Oxford would only benefit if the outskirts were modernised and some fresh buildings were added to it's drab skyline.
Naturally, it is important to preserve the university and college areas, but it is also important to ensure that Oxford meets the needs of it's growing population. This means new housing, business opportunities and an infrastructure than is far better than that we have today.
EMBOX1
says...
12:21pm Wed 14 Nov 12
We should keep all buildings which are "old" and those which are more modern, nasty 60s/70s buildings (including the Westgate) can be pulled down.
I don't think you can compare Edwardian/Victorian or older architecture with concrete brutalist architecture of the 60s. However nice it seemed then, its awful now, and they without exception have aged terribly.
I'd pull down:
- Westgate & Car Park
- Macclesfield House
- County Hall
- Council offices on Cowley Rd
- Eyesore St. Johns accommodation
- Blackwells Building on Hythe Bridge St
Andrew:Oxford
says...
1:33pm Wed 14 Nov 12
EMBOX1 wrote:Macclesfield House is coming down next year.
If you look at old photos of New Road there was a lovely old building there, pulled down to build the various (now ex) council building in the late 60s. We should keep all buildings which are "old" and those which are more modern, nasty 60s/70s buildings (including the Westgate) can be pulled down. I don't think you can compare Edwardian/Victorian or older architecture with concrete brutalist architecture of the 60s. However nice it seemed then, its awful now, and they without exception have aged terribly. I'd pull down: - Westgate & Car Park - Macclesfield House - County Hall - Council offices on Cowley Rd - Eyesore St. Johns accommodation - Blackwells Building on Hythe Bridge St
Should be a headline story in the Oxford Mail/Oxford Times about it in the next few days.
oxchris says...
9:22am Tue 13 Nov 12