Archive - Saturday, 21 January 2012


Never miss anything again. Sign up for our RSS news feeds and Newsletters.

Is reinstating rail link a track to the future?

REOPENING the Rail link from Oxford to Witney and Carterton may be investigated under new county council plans.

The line became popular in the age of steam The line became popular in the age of steam

The long-term proposal, which would cut traffic on the A40, is contained within a new council rail strategy outlining its vision for the railways over the next 22 years.

Neither of the two largest towns in West Oxfordshire have a railway station, after the branch line from Yarnton to Fairford was axed in the 1960s.

The strategy lists investigating the long-term reinstatement of a rail link as a “key opportunity” to improve connections to RAF Brize Norton.

The county councillor behind the strategy, Rodney Rose, said: “It is one of those things which is on our wish list, and it should be explored to see if there’s any possibility of it happening.

“I would not expect any work on it in the very near future. Oxford Station has got to take priority, and that will no doubt take all the funding for the next 10 years.”

The rail strategy also proposes looking at dedicated feeder bus services to Hanborough Station from both Witney and Carterton.

Passenger groups and West Oxfordshire District Council welcomed the suggestion of a county council investigation into reopening the stations.

Cotswold Line Promotion Group chairman John Ellis said: “From time to time people have thought about the possibility of reinstatment, particularly with congestion on the A40 and the extent to which it could reduce that, but I have no idea what previous infrastructure is still available.

“If anybody were to do a study, we would very much support it both from a connectivity point of view, but also to take traffic off the A40 if you saw it as a Witney to Oxford shuttle.”

West Oxfordshire District Council leader Barry Norton said: “We would certainly welcome moves to investigate returning the link to Witney and Carterton, but I suspect this is going to be a long-term aspiration rather than a short- or medium-term thing.

“This was looked at in the late 1990s and a feasibility study was carried out when we were pushing for it. The result was that costs were prohibitive. They were talking in excess of £100m and there were problems highlighted at Eynsham, South Leigh and Witney, where the line had been built on.”

“It is not without problems but there may be an economic business case for something in the distant future.

“It has got to be a positive move on the county’s part.”

Witney held a public holiday when the railway arrived in 1861. But the Beeching cuts saw the last regular passenger train steam out of Witney on June 18, 1962, and goods services leaving in November 1970.

In the 1970s and again in the late ’90s, suggestions of reopening the stations were dismissed.

Network Rail spokesman Sam Kelly told the Oxford Mail: “We are aware of it but it is not part of plans at the moment. We will be discussing it with the council.”

THE former branch line to Witney, Carterton and Fairford in Gloucestershire was built in two stages.

The first, from Yarnton Junction, on the Cotswold Line, to Witney opened in 1861. The second, the East Gloucestershire Railway, was originally intended to link Witney with Cheltenham, but it was cut short at Fairford, opening in 1873.

For most of its life, the route carried local passenger traffic and freight to and from the woollen mills of Witney, with coal to power the blanket mills coming in and the finished products being sent out.

The years before the Second World War saw an upsurge in traffic, with military bases being built along the route, including RAF Brize Norton, leading to the opening of Carterton Station in 1944.

With the growth of road traffic after the war, the line’s fortunes began to fade.

It was closed to all traffic west of Witney in June 1962, with only goods trains remaining between Oxford and Witney. The last goods trains ran in 1970 and the track was later torn up.

The former stations at Eynsham and Witney have been redeveloped as business parks, while Carterton was converted into a riding stable.


Comments (20)

says...

21/01/12

Andrew:Oxford says...

It can only be a good thing that it is under consideration for the future.

In the meantime, Oxford Rail Station is in desperate need of a massive upgrade. Essentially, to meet the basic core needs for a good passenger service (and through freight services) currently operating through the station. At least 4 12-car through platforms are required as well as a freight relief line.

Then there is the road and "pavement" below.

21/01/12

Danny A says...

I'd be interested to know if a new Oxford Station could not be built from scratch, better, more cheaply and with less disruption here:
http://www.oxfordmai
l.co.uk/news/9479178
.City_presses_for_50
0_home_estate/

21/01/12

Gunslinger says...

Cambridge have done something similar with the former rail line to St Ives. However this has been developed as a bus link, which (a) might be cheaper and (b) allows vehicles to carry on into the city/town centres.

21/01/12

Hellox says...

No one has a crystal ball but Beeching has a lot to answer for.
Oxford and the county would be such a better place if it still had it rail links to the towns and villages.

I fear it won't happen because of the expense. Or that the tickets will be extravagantly priced to pay for it all.

21/01/12

Andrew:Oxford says...

Gunslinger wrote:
Cambridge have done something similar with the former rail line to St Ives. However this has been developed as a bus link, which (a) might be cheaper and (b) allows vehicles to carry on into the city/town centres.
Two years late and £181M in construction costs.

21/01/12

K. Darke says...

If reinstatement is considered then hopefully it would be costed out as a light rail/tram system as a successfully used on the Continent. Last time the costs were prohibative as it was costed for use as if it was to be a heavy freight line therefore making it look far more expensive than it needed to be in comparison with a guided bus way.

21/01/12

Patrick in Devon says...

Probably cost less as a single track conventional railway, with a passing loop near Witney. This would enable portions of London-Oxford services to run through every half hour.

The problem then is, how to connect Oxford station with the employment centres - science area, "eastern arc", Cowley etc. Thats where a modern light rail system would be fitting.

21/01/12

the wizard says...

While many would welcome this, it has been debated here a few times and there are those who have previously searched long and hard for reasons to oppose it, sadly.
I think a logical way to integrate it into Oxford is for the route to pass alongside the A40 to pick up the railtrack into Oxford station from the Wolvercote end. This way is could also serve Cassington and Eyensham easily. It is plain to see a lot of engineering work would have to be done which ever route is chosen. Local labour should be insisted on and this would create a lot of jobs and would help in getting people back into work if only for a limited period, and it would ease the burden on the taxpayer as goes benefits etc. A single track system with passing points at stops would be a cheaper alternative, but as somebody pointed out only a few weeks ago, the existing bus service runs very well, but somehow, light rail, with the units passing the long queues of stationary traffic may entice folk back onto the rails, and ease congestion.

21/01/12

Andrew:Oxford says...

Patrick in Devon wrote:
Probably cost less as a single track conventional railway, with a passing loop near Witney. This would enable portions of London-Oxford services to run through every half hour.

The problem then is, how to connect Oxford station with the employment centres - science area, "eastern arc", Cowley etc. Thats where a modern light rail system would be fitting.
"Heavy Rail" continues to serve the BMW factory at Cowley for freight.

Passing Redbridge, Sainsbury, Science Park/Kassam, Tesco/Business Park en-route.

There are many people on the Business Park & Science Park who would love a service that used the extant railway.

There are also many on the Science Park who'd love the X39/X40 to make a few minute diversion to serve a park of 1000s when it'll stop at the end of a farm-track to serve 1.

22/01/12

LORD PETE MCVEY OX2 6EG says...

Hellox wrote:
No one has a crystal ball but Beeching has a lot to answer for.
Oxford and the county would be such a better place if it still had it rail links to the towns and villages.

I fear it won't happen because of the expense. Or that the tickets will be extravagantly priced to pay for it all.
Tickets to anywhere are extravagantly priced on the railways, and most of them take our (taxpayers) money on top. It is time that the railway was either re-nationalised, or fully privatised. It is obscene that private companies take taxpayers money whilst lining their pockets with £million+ bonuses every year, the same goes for the bus companies as well.

22/01/12

nickwilcock says...

Oxford has an inflated opinion of both its attractiveness and importance. Neither is Witney some suburb of Oxford.

The rail plan, nice though it would be, is simply unrealistic. Don't forget how few trains ran when the line was open - 4 or 5 per day, I gather.

But an improved, frequent bus service with a guided section from Wolvercote, would be of benefit.

However, the first improvement needs to be to dual the A40 from the M40 to the Witney by-pass.

And ultimately beyond?

22/01/12

worldoftrans says...

shame the M40 never took its originally planned route to the M5 and the M41 continued North of Tring

22/01/12

jimm says...

nickwilcock wrote:
Oxford has an inflated opinion of both its attractiveness and importance. Neither is Witney some suburb of Oxford.

The rail plan, nice though it would be, is simply unrealistic. Don't forget how few trains ran when the line was open - 4 or 5 per day, I gather.

But an improved, frequent bus service with a guided section from Wolvercote, would be of benefit.

However, the first improvement needs to be to dual the A40 from the M40 to the Witney by-pass.

And ultimately beyond?
What has the timetable in the 1950s got to do with it? Witney and carterton (and RAF Brize Norton) were ever so slightly smaller then and weren't expected to act as dormitory towns to Oxford. The world has changed...

Have you bothered to check how many buses stagecoach runs on the s1 and S2 in the peaks? Many more and they would be nose-to-tail along the A40.

And the A40 is dual almost all the way from Wolvercote to the M40 now. All that dualling Witney to Wolvercote would do is get more traffic, more quickly, into the jams around Oxford, or are you going to smash lots of new roads through Oxford as well?

22/01/12

Paul Wesson says...

In 1962 Witney had a population of about 8000 and Carterton 3000. Today Witney is over 25,000 whilst. Carterton is approaching 20,000. Commuting is more normal and many residents already drive to Oxford, a journey that was not s0 easy in 1962 with the roads and technlology of the time. The rail route would serve some 60,000 people including proximate village communities. That would make allow it to make money on its operating costs. (f the stations were owned and operated by the local council then a percentage of sales would be returned to the local exchequer (this is allowed). Capital costs would not be returned very quickly, but in this day and age we are talking separate budgets and government infrastructure projects.

22/01/12

Patrick in Devon says...

Lots more housing development planned for Witney and Carterton. Why not get the developers to make a contribution?

22/01/12

The Big Issue says...

The Fairford extension was a pointless exercise from the start. In Stanley Jenkins book about the line, it shows even Eynsham handling more passengers and freight thanany on the East Glos extension. Had it remained a terminus at Witney operating costs would've been cheaper and might've saved it from closure.

23/01/12

the wizard says...

Given the estates going up, already gone up etc in Witney and Carterton a light rail with intelligent third rail would be brilliant. Well positioned stops with facilities for bike locking would be great, and a good step forward towards reducing pollution and congestion.

24/01/12

bodchris says...

Why waste money on an expensive and outdated mode of transport. Better spend the money on making the A40 dual carriage way without traffic lights and 'hamburgers'/roundab
outs all the way from Cheltenham and the M40 (better make it three lane to make it future proof)

24/01/12

the wizard says...

bodchris,

Quote,
(better make it three lane to make it future proof)

You must be having a laugh,

3 lane roads are a disaster, and a recipe for total carnage, which is why they have all but vanished.

A properly run light rail system with enough connections and links in Oxford to the main rail and inner city bus routes could be the way forward, removing congestion and pollution, and could form part of the Oxford railway station regeneration if County planners get a wriggle on.