Never miss anything again. Sign up for our RSS news feeds and Newsletters.

Vaizey calls for new curbs on Internet porn

CHILDREN surfing the Internet need better protection to stop them stumbling across pornography, an Oxfordshire MP says.

Ed Vaizey Ed Vaizey

Culture Secretary and Wantage MP Ed Vaizey is calling for internet service providers (ISPs) to tighten controls on website pornography to help keep children safer.

Last night his calls were echoed by a youth worker in Oxford.

Ministers want broadband providers to consider automatically blocking all sex sites, with individuals being required to choose to receive them, rather than opting out and using parental controls on their computers.

The action follows moves by most British Internet providers to prevent people inadvertently viewing child pornography websites.

It is understood that ministers now want to see adult pornography controlled with similar technology, with sites blocked unless people specifically request access to them.

Mr Vaizey is expected to meet Internet providers over the next few weeks to discuss making changes.

The move is designed to protect children from being exposed to pornography on the Internet.

Mr Vaizey said: “This is a very serious matter.

“I think it is very important that it is the ISPs that come up with solutions to protect children.

“I’m hoping they will get their act together so that we don’t have to legislate, but we are keeping an eye on the situation and we will have a new communications bill in the next couple of years.”

A parliamentary debate heard that 60 per cent of nine- to 19-year-olds had discovered pornography online.

Adrian Hicks, manager of the IT Hub at Rose Hill Children’s Centre in The Oval, Oxford, backed the move. He said: “I have a 15-year-old son and I do worry about what images he will stumble across when he is using the Internet.

“What Mr Vaizey is proposing sounds quite sensible and I’m sure parents will appreciate the efforts he is making”


Comments (7)

31/12/10

Alfie Nokes says...

See also "Streisand effect" and the decade-and-a-half-ol
d addage that "the Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it." regardless of what your intention is.

31/12/10

Kennys hat says...

What happened to parental responsibility? Why can't people police their own children? Why not ban knives and bleaches and anything else that may be harmful to children while parents are too busy to supervise them?

31/12/10

OxfordResident says...

The difference is that 'nomal' **** is legal - child **** is illegal. It is a slippery, China-like, slope to go down if you are starting to block legal sites.

Also, I really don't think that Mr Vaizey, or slightly worryingly the manager of the IT Hub, have much concept about the scale, or make-up of the internet.

01/01/11

Cleaning Lady says...

That's right! Clean up the internet! How wonderful that a politician is concerned with our moral wellbeing! After all they set such a wonderul example themslves ;)

01/01/11

Darkforbid says...

Why have they found a way to tag Wikileaks as ****?

01/01/11

Darkforbid says...

Funny you can use the edited P word in the story head line... But not when you comment on it.

05/01/11

Sophia says...

If this guy thinks it worrying that a 15 year old boy might want to look at attractive nude girls doing naughty things, then he is living on Planet Narnia.

Shock horror, people like seeing sexy bodies!

But then Tories have always been worried by sex. They like it furtive.

Any anyway why cant he control access himself by using parental locks and safe serach filters? Oh because his son wont let him. And how's that going to work under Vaizeys daft scheme - the boy can simply ask for uncontrolled access, yes?

Bakc to the 1950s - no thanks

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree