INSIDER: West Way plan bemuses own industry insiders

.

.

First published in News

THE Insider understands that the decision by construction firm Mace to invest in the controversial West Way redevelopment has bemused industry specialists.

When The Insider glanced at The Construction Index website he noticed that the £100m development has made ripples in the construction industry.

The website says that Mace has one of the better reputations among construction industry contractors.

It goes on to report that one industry insider said: “This is stunningly unpopular and set for a prolonged legal battle. I’m surprised that Mace want to get involved.”

 

Oxford Mail:

COUNTY councillor Rodney Rose, pictured, could be excused for feeling faintly relieved this week.

The deputy leader of Oxfordshire County Council – who until last year was cabinet member for transport – had to sit through a two-hour cabinet meeting examining in great detail the decision his successor David Nimmo Smith made on a series of 16 speed bumps in Bicester.

His decision to approve the scheme had been called in following uproar in the town because of a lack of consultation.

Addressing the meeting, Mr Rose admitted he was relieved to no longer hold the transport portfolio – presumably also because his is no longer the name motorists can curse when stuck in traffic.

Oxford Mail:

MATT Barber, the leader of Vale of White Horse District Council, has obviously been keeping on top of his authority’s finances.

When asked by one of The Insider’s colleagues whether the council had been given the final installment of payments for the Old Gaol in Abingdon, Mr Barber,above, confidently asserted that it had. But when pressed on whether it amounted to the expected £2m, he seemed to waiver and asked us to go to the district council’s press office.


Oxford Mail:

IT’S often journalists who are described as cynics, but politicians can fall victim to the same thing.

When city councillor Craig Simmons, above, was voted in as Oxford’s deputy Lord Mayor earlier this month, his Green colleague Dick Wolff made a passing reference to his time in a band.

In fact Mr Simmons’ band beat a nascent Iron Maiden in a competition in the 1970s.

But Labour city councillor Anne Marie Canning appears to be a bit of a Doubting Thomas and has asked Mr Simmons to cough up the evidence – something the Green city councillor is promptly doing to make sure any lingering doubts Run to the Hills.

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:26am Thu 19 Jun 14

Megs says...

On the West Way development, Watergate's deep throat inexplicably springs to mind - "Follow the money".
On the West Way development, Watergate's deep throat inexplicably springs to mind - "Follow the money". Megs
  • Score: 2

12:12pm Thu 19 Jun 14

King Joke says...

If sixteen speed humps can cause 'uproar' in a town, there can't be much going on there!
If sixteen speed humps can cause 'uproar' in a town, there can't be much going on there! King Joke
  • Score: 3

12:43pm Thu 19 Jun 14

Andrew:Oxford says...

Megs wrote:
On the West Way development, Watergate's deep throat inexplicably springs to mind - "Follow the money".
If you follow it back far enough, you'll find most of the "Activists" will have pension funds invested in a stakeholder of the redevelopment.
[quote][p][bold]Megs[/bold] wrote: On the West Way development, Watergate's deep throat inexplicably springs to mind - "Follow the money".[/p][/quote]If you follow it back far enough, you'll find most of the "Activists" will have pension funds invested in a stakeholder of the redevelopment. Andrew:Oxford
  • Score: 1

9:41pm Thu 19 Jun 14

Megs says...

Andrew:Oxford wrote:
Megs wrote: On the West Way development, Watergate's deep throat inexplicably springs to mind - "Follow the money".
If you follow it back far enough, you'll find most of the "Activists" will have pension funds invested in a stakeholder of the redevelopment.
And your point is........?
[quote][p][bold]Andrew:Oxford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Megs[/bold] wrote: On the West Way development, Watergate's deep throat inexplicably springs to mind - "Follow the money".[/p][/quote]If you follow it back far enough, you'll find most of the "Activists" will have pension funds invested in a stakeholder of the redevelopment.[/p][/quote]And your point is........? Megs
  • Score: 1

9:52pm Thu 19 Jun 14

Andrew:Oxford says...

Exactly as you said.

"Follow the money"
Exactly as you said. "Follow the money" Andrew:Oxford
  • Score: -1

11:24pm Thu 19 Jun 14

Megs says...

Andrew:Oxford wrote:
Exactly as you said. "Follow the money"
From what you say Andrew, you are much further down the track of following the money on this proposed development, than I am, you having tracked down individuals' pension arrangements and pension fund investments. As this is a matter of some public interest could you elucidate which these pension funds are; what percentage of the costs of this development would be drawn from what you term "activists" pension arrangements; what your sources for this information are; and how you overcame data protection protocols to obtain it?
Further, as you have already obtained this somewhat sensitive information it would seem reasonable to expect that you must have information of other, non-pension fund investors in the stakeholders in this development ( what individuals, if any, for example?). So that everyone interested can get the full picture, I would urge you to share this, not least in the interests of transparency. Thanks for your stirling work so far - and keep it up.
[quote][p][bold]Andrew:Oxford[/bold] wrote: Exactly as you said. "Follow the money"[/p][/quote]From what you say Andrew, you are much further down the track of following the money on this proposed development, than I am, you having tracked down individuals' pension arrangements and pension fund investments. As this is a matter of some public interest could you elucidate which these pension funds are; what percentage of the costs of this development would be drawn from what you term "activists" pension arrangements; what your sources for this information are; and how you overcame data protection protocols to obtain it? Further, as you have already obtained this somewhat sensitive information it would seem reasonable to expect that you must have information of other, non-pension fund investors in the stakeholders in this development ( what individuals, if any, for example?). So that everyone interested can get the full picture, I would urge you to share this, not least in the interests of transparency. Thanks for your stirling work so far - and keep it up. Megs
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree