Green Belt worry leads to a U-turn over Kidlington homes plan

CPRE Oxfordshire director Helen Marshall

CPRE Oxfordshire director Helen Marshall

First published in News Oxford Mail: Photograph of the Author by , Health reporter, also covering Kidlington. Call me on 01865 425271

CALLS for more housing have been dropped by Kidlington Parish Council over concerns it could lead to additional homes in the Green Belt.

Parish councillors had supported plans for housing in the Green Belt in the Langford Lane area along with businesses proposed by planning bosses.

But they have dropped this proposal over fears it could lead to a review of the Green Belt around the village.

This would be a “potential threat to the village’s identity and character” the parish council said, despite its concerns about lack of housing to accommodate new employees at the proposed business premises.

It comes amid uncertainty over the level of housing development in Kidlington and Cherwell district, of which the village is part.

All housing plans and other development to 2031 is in Cherwell District Council’s local plan, which the Government must approve.

But a Government inspector this month said Cherwell must boost district-wide housing from 16,750 to 22,800.

That came after a review of housing ordered by district councils – the Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) – said the county needed 100,000 more homes than planned by 2031.

And Oxford City Council has called for more building in the Green Belt south of Kidlington and north east and south west of Yarnton.

A parish council statement said: “Kidlington Parish Council initially argued that the development should be for mixed use to include housing in order to mitigate the pressure on local housing that the new employment would generate.

“However, Kidlington Parish Council has decided not to object to the plan on this basis, because it accepts Cherwell’s view that to allow housing on this site could help to trigger a full-scale review of the Green Belt.”

The statement – from chairman David Betts and vice-chairman David Robey – said they were concerned about further “significant developments” in other parts of the Green Belt.

Helen Marshall, director of the Oxfordshire branch of Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) said she was confident the uncertainty about the local plan would not lead to wider Green Belt development in Kidlington.

She said of the parish council: “They are as keen as we are to protect the Green Belt, they are anxious to avoid a complete Green Belt review.

“Cherwell District Council are not proposing any housing in the Green Belt, which is a position we support and we hope they maintain that.”

Plans are to be submitted for a science park on the Langford Lane site that would create about 1,200 jobs, the Oxford Mail reported last week.

Cherwell lead member for planning Michael Gibbard said: “Currently I do not believe a review of the Green Belt is required for Cherwell’s housing needs.”

 

 

 

Our top stories:

New: Get Oxford Mail news alerts sent direct to your phone via Whatsapp

Oxford Mail: Whats App logo

11:50am Tuesday 3rd June 2014

OXFORD Mail readers can now sign up to get major breaking news alerts sent direct to their mobile phones with a new service using Whatsapp.

Set for a battle of Blenheim over 1,500 homes plan

Oxford Mail:

9:00am Tuesday 9th September 2014

RESIDENTS in Woodstock have vowed to “fight until the bitter end” against plans to build up to 1,500 homes east of the town.

Delays of up to 40 minutes on bus services across the county

Oxford Mail: Traffic Alert general

9:00am Tuesday 9th September 2014

STAGECOACH Oxfordshire has warned that passengers face delays of up to 40 minutes this morning.

Harassment cop sacked for gross misconduct

Oxford Mail: Thames Valley Police logo

8:30am Tuesday 9th September 2014

A DETECTIVE has been sacked after harassing a member of police staff, the force said yesterday.

Fears as boat owners’ group claims new area of riverbank

Oxford Mail:

8:00am Tuesday 9th September 2014

RESIDENTS say they are worried about another attempt by boat owners to grab land alongside waterways in the city.

Mum cleared of breaking baby daughter’s leg

Oxford Mail: The Horton General Hospital, Banbury

6:30am Tuesday 9th September 2014

A TEENAGER accused of breaking her baby daughter’s leg broke down in tears as she was cleared yesterday.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:39pm Thu 19 Jun 14

middleton kidlington says...

Kidlington Parish Council are useless, Kidlington is getting boring to live in no new houses for young people no decent facilities.

The Parish Council waste money on stupid things like fence around the toilet in the high street

Just look at Bicester all the investment over there and nothing for Kidlington
Kidlington Parish Council are useless, Kidlington is getting boring to live in no new houses for young people no decent facilities. The Parish Council waste money on stupid things like fence around the toilet in the high street Just look at Bicester all the investment over there and nothing for Kidlington middleton kidlington
  • Score: -1

2:23pm Thu 19 Jun 14

Myron Blatz says...

Yes, but you see Bicester is a proper Town, whereas Kedelinton (as it was known in the 13th century) prefers to remains a big village, with a cosy, locally elected Parish Council, masonic lodge and mention in the Domesady Book around 1086, when it was probably known as Chedelintone - though no mention was made of Kidlington London Airport, or builders called Ede.
Yes, but you see Bicester is a proper Town, whereas Kedelinton (as it was known in the 13th century) prefers to remains a big village, with a cosy, locally elected Parish Council, masonic lodge and mention in the Domesady Book around 1086, when it was probably known as Chedelintone - though no mention was made of Kidlington London Airport, or builders called Ede. Myron Blatz
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree