Flood forum channels hope for £123m plans

Rodney Rose at the flood forum

Rodney Rose at the flood forum

First published in News Oxford Mail: Photograph of the Author by , Education Reporter, also covering West Oxford. Call me on (01865) 425437

MORE than 100 representatives met at the weekend to discuss how to protect Oxford from flooding.

Councillors met at the Flood Forum at The King’s Centre, Osney Mead, on Saturday.

Among items under discussions was plans for a Western Conveyance channel around the city to divert flood waters. It would run from Seacourt Stream, north of Botley Road, to Sandford Lock at Sandford-on-Thames, south of the city.

Prime Minister David Cameron gave his support last week but funding is not yet in place.

West Thames operations manager at the Environment Agency Barry Russell said: “The total cost is £123m but it would provide a £1bn benefit over the next 100 years. It would reduce the flood risk to properties in Oxford.”

Councillors were told January’s flooding swamped 168 homes and 32 residents had to evacuated compared to 3,000 homes and 600 evacuees in 2007.

Chief fire officer Dave Etheridge said pumping which kept Botley Road open last month was not a long-term solution.

He said: “It was a unique set of circumstances which allowed us to pump around the clock and keep the road open and open Abingdon Road sooner.

“It was a good solution in the short term but not something which would be available to us in the future.”

Its work in Botley Road and Abingdon Road last month cost about £20,000, he said.

The closure of both roads in January cost the city’s economy about £40m, Oxford City Council said.

Oxfordshire County Council will hold a larger meeting, dubbed a “flooding summit”, on March 21.

Deputy leader Rodney Rose said: “This has allowed us to gather feedback from across the communities which we can analyse ahead of the flood summit. It would be impossible for everyone here to address the summit, so this has been very useful.”

Related links

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:20am Mon 3 Mar 14

Gunslinger says...

There needs to be a solution for the whole Oxford region, not just focussing on this one channel which could make things worse.

Moving the water past Oxford more quickly may just put Abingdon at risk. Solving Abingdon's problem may impact on Culham and Sutton Courtenay, and so on.

There also need to be ways to store water and moderate flows upstream in the places where it is coming from, and like it or not this may involve controlled flooding of farmland and recreational areas. Not just in the Thames itself, but the major tributaries like the Cherwell, Ock and Thame - is anybody giving thought to precisely which areas could/should be "sacrificed"?
There needs to be a solution for the whole Oxford region, not just focussing on this one channel which could make things worse. Moving the water past Oxford more quickly may just put Abingdon at risk. Solving Abingdon's problem may impact on Culham and Sutton Courtenay, and so on. There also need to be ways to store water and moderate flows upstream in the places where it is coming from, and like it or not this may involve controlled flooding of farmland and recreational areas. Not just in the Thames itself, but the major tributaries like the Cherwell, Ock and Thame - is anybody giving thought to precisely which areas could/should be "sacrificed"? Gunslinger
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree